Stanford Experiment Unethical

Great Essays
The Stanford Experiment ethical or un-ethical, why and what was the purpose, what was learned and what did the Stanford Experiment contribute in the scientific community of studying human behavior? To understand and answer these questions one must start with the beginning, the very genesis of what is one of the most ground breaking experiments in my own perspective opinion. The Stanford Prison Experiment which was conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues. This was a pioneer experiment which push the limits to the exploration to human behavior. One of his colleagues Philip Zimbardo was a former classmate of a Stanley Milgram, a psychologist from Yale University who was famously known for his obedience experiment …show more content…
Philip Zimbardo methods and intentions in preparing this experiment started out ethical but became un-ethical once he let the experiment run its course without his control or influence. This is why his experiment is widely revered to as an example of unethical research. But the purpose of Philip Zimbardo Stanford Experiment is just as important as it was back than as it is now.
I believe research as to what the effects of human behavior with power and those under imprisonment are important in understanding the human behavioral psyche. As human society evolves day in and day out. The building blocks all our greatest human accomplishments and our greatest human disasters start from the foundation of what makes one act or in act, what makes one individual choose a series of actions as supposed to another. I believe Phillip Zimbardo understood this truth of and why it was so important to have an experiment that challenge to uncover this truth. What was learned in Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Experiment was that human individuals placed in a positon of power are more likely to abuse their power than any other outcome. So would argue that to be false, that a conclusion could and should not
…show more content…
As society grows and rules a politics become more and more powerful. It is important as a society for us to remember what makes humanity precious and how fragile our way of life is. Till this day and again 40 years after the Stanford experiment third world countries show proof of the primal devastation of what can occur to those who wield power and suppress others. If further research like the Stanford and experiment is not performed or looked into due to the code of ethical standard that governs it. Then the world as we know it will have no defense against a forgotten truth. The truth that though order and force is necessary in order to keep peace, boundaries, motives and standards need to be set in order for humanity to remain balanced. Now whether or not this truth will remains to be seen or realized, It is based upon those like phycologist Philip Zimbardo who study in the field and conduct experimental research that boarders and treads the line of what is ethically correct or wrong that will continuously uncover the truth about human behavior and society’s acceptance of this truth and its application to our state laws and legislation that govern our country and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo's Argument Essay

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The final component that led to the disaster of the Stanford experiment was the situation. In the end of Zimbardo’s experiment “the situation won; humanity lost.” (revisiting the Stanford prison experiment) No matter what your upbringings were it seems that all the volunteers responded to the power they were given. As the prisoners rebelled the guards found punishments they felt were suitable.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo Evaluation

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    His study was deemed highly unethical as suffering by the participants was experienced to such a high degree. This could have caused psychological harm to the individuals participating. As a result of such behaviour, governments have now decided to have a detailed look into the ethics of research to ensure no harm is given to participants of any study. Zimbardo claims that today we are now unable to gain new knowledge that could enhance society due to the ethical restrictions. (Maslach, 1996)…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1971 the study by Philip Zimbardo was constructed in the hope to analyze how regular people will react when given some power in a set environment and to show how a group of men will react when given a very broad task. A total of 24 college students were offered $15 each day if they were chosen to play any role, by determining what people they should choose they had a group of about 70 men take a small quiz to show how stable they were psychologically and physically. For the men that were chosen they got split into groups some were told…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, an experiment took place in Stanford, California. It was named the Stanford Prison Experiment, lasting what was meant to be two weeks, but due to the brutality of the trial, lasted a mere 6 days. Its purpose was to conduct a study on humanity and show just how evil a human can get when given a position of power. To summarize the experiment, a random 18 men were chosen, all innocent, good people who’d never committed a crime. They were divided into two groups erratically: 9 being “prisoners” and 9 being “guards.”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of the experiments that took place validates that we as individuals need to acknowledge that just because someone, an authority figure, or the law, tells us we need to do something, have a mind of your own to analyze and think with, we should not conform simply because we feel it is what is expected of…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. What were the theoretical propositions of this experiment? In what aspect(s) of human behavior were they interested? What question(s) were they seeking to answer?…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram Experiment Introduction Many people question whether the Milgram experiment was ethical or not, and whether the experiment should had been allowed at all. But like most significant psychological discoveries, sometimes ethics could’ve been overseen in order to obtain great data. Because of Milgram experiment, psychologists today have a better understanding of group dynamics. Milgram’s experiment enabled better understanding of human obedience to an authority figure. Ethics that might have been violated throughout the process of Milgram’s study can be justified in the experiment itself.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment Does giving one person more power than another really change the way that they will react in a certain situation? Do certain circumstances cause a different reaction in different people? That was the question for the Stanford Prison Experiment performed by Phil Zimbardo in 1971. In an attempt to show what life was like to be in prison, the inmates and guards of Stanford County Jail, were placed in an almost inhumane setting. The tyranny of the men in charge, along with the abuse of the inmates, goes to show how people that are placed in an environment and told to play roles that they are not necessarily familiar with, can go wrong.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo on this experiment were indecisive on how they think the experiment should but ran. They obviously thought Dr. Zimbardo’s methods were becoming excessive yet they were hesitant to say so out of fear of challenging Zimbardo’s authority. The sociocultural perspective of this situation was that they refused to overstep their boundaries due to the societal understandings that we have towards authoritative figures. It is seen as a sign of disrespect in our society, especially during that time period, to challenge those who have power: parents, teachers, bosses, officers, etc. Virtually anyone who is seen to hold some level of authority over us.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Concerns Experimental design is a field whereby ethical concerns are almost always a top priority. Although most individuals see ethical norms as common sense, they often vary from culture to culture and there can be discrepancies in the interpretation even by members within a certain cultural group. Furthermore, it is vital to determine any potential ethical concerns contained within an experiment and address those concerns in order to reduce their potential impact on the results. The first potential ethical concern that may be encountered during our experiment is an experimenter either intentionally or accidentally falsifying, fabricating or misrepresenting the data that is collected from the test subjects.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only did the Milgram experiment an unethical experiment pave the way for future study on this, but it proved that people will do almost anything if an authority figure tells them to. Lastly the Stanford prison experiment even though the experiment was called off way before its two weeks where up it still provides a lot of good research. It conducted that “people will truly become any role they are given during the experiment the people task with the guard role became aggressive and abused their power” (Green). This shows why people given role like community leader or…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays