Case Study: Standing Rock Positioners Vs. Army Corps Of Engineers

Superior Essays
Standing Rock protesters VS Army Corps of Engineers.
A group of 200 Native Americans stood among the Standing Rock Indian Reservation on April 1st, 2016 to protest against the 3.7 billion Dakota Access oil pipeline. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a pipeline that transfers 470,000 barrels of unpurified oil from Bakken North Dakota to a terminus near Patoka, Illinois (Epstien, 2016). On July 26th, 2016, The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers approved the final word for the land easement and water crossing to allow the pipeline to move forward. According to USA Today, the DAPL will undergo the few of many sacred sites for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. The holy places that consist around water for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe are; the Mississippi
…show more content…
“Protectors, not protesters” were trying to keep bulldozers from starting construction onto burial grounds of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. The Standing Rock Sioux tribal chairman, David Archambault stated that the security of the construction site allowed bulldozers to come at a particular time and by the time the bulldozers were stopped it was too late. The bulldozers ruined the tribal land, desecrated their ancestral gravesites and also destroying prayer sites (Goodman & Moynihan, 2016). On November 21st, 2016, protestors at the Standing Rock campsite were sprayed with water cannons and tear gassed and shot with rubber bullets at below freezing weather (PBS, 2016). Indigenous Environmental Network spokeswomen, Jade Begay confirmed with a journalist that over more than 160 protesters were injured and another seven people were taken to the local hospital. Many with a peak of hypothermia (PBS, 2016).
The pros of building the Dakota Access Pipeline from North Dakota to Illinois will increase over 8,000 to 12,000 jobs (ProsCons, 2016). The pipeline will also help with the economy possibly earning $50 million annually in property taxes and $74 million in sales taxes. The increase in the economy could lead to more improved schools, roads, and emergency
…show more content…
Amy Dalrymple, Army Corps of Engineers, stated that the plan to place the pipeline in Lake Oahe would not be a problem because the water level is shallow; making it more susceptible to breaking or releasing oil into the water supply due to a leak. According to Time, there have been over 3,000 oil and pipe leaks in the United States since 2010. Since the water is shallow and thin, the oil will contaminate the Standing Rock Sioux tribe 's water supply (Latour,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota pipeline is a long pipe that will run crude oil from that will run from North Dakota all the way to south Illinois it will go through 4 states and it will be crossing Native American land that was given to them and now they want to take…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By taking legal action and looking for support from the many #NoDAPL activists that have fought for months at the spirit camps in North Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux hopes to make a difference against this controversial pipeline. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency behind the plan for the Dakota Access Pipeline, “probably thought their path forward was clear”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Recently, they have proposed an additional pipeline called the Keystone XL which has not been installed yet. The installation of the Keystone XL pipeline should be disapproved by the United States Government for it will bring both environmental and economic disadvantages, leaving our nation vulnerable Our country’s dependence on gasoline has significantly increased as a result of the increase in…

    • 2082 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keystone Pipeline

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Bill McKibben’s article, “Why Dakota Is the New Keystone,” expresses how Native Americans want to live peacefully without their history and culture in danger of this pipeline. The United States Army verses Native Americans is a big point in this article. McKibben clearly states how this battle has gone on for a while now and has caused a tremendous amount of damage. “The shocking images of the National Guard destroying tepees and sweat lodges and arresting elders”.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For more than seven months Native Americans protested against changes in their sacred land to keep tradition and to preserve the primitive land. The Native Americans were, for the first time, joined by other Americans to protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline. In “An Indian Protest for Everyone”, David Treuer explains and builds an argument that Native Americans at Standing Rock have developed a new method of protesting. Treuer uses different language choices and persuasive elements to strengthen his argument.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    South Dakotan Native Americans who own property on the Lakota reservation engaged in non-violent protest “to protect their sacred water and other natural resources” as one tribal elder remarked that “there is no way for Native people to say no – there never has been (Hotakainen).” Claims of eminent domain, which have historically been used to justify encroachment on tribal property and function centrally in the legal reasoning behind the Keystone XL proposal, almost always work in the interest of Whites and at the expense of Indian property rights, even though they claim to be race-blind. Property rights of Native Americans are under unique attack: It is inconceivable, for example, that the federal government would use eminent domain to justify the construction of an intrusive pipeline in Fairfax, Virginia. The very nature of eminent domain prevents non-political minorities from effectively representing their interests because they are forced to take the position of defending property rights against a formidable (if false) construction of the public’s best interest. As a result, proposals such as the Keystone XL pipeline turn public opinion against Native American groups and reduce the legitimacy of their claims to exclusive property on…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the signing of executive order, protesting about the pipeline has been an ongoing event. The main protester against the Dakota Pipeline is a tribe known as the Standing Rock Sioux (Yan, Park, Ravits and Sidner, 2017). Their key concern is the pipeline being tunneled under Lake Oahe, which is a section…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline does not necessarily have a ‘finite amount of resources’ to be dealt with, rather it focuses on the possibility of harming or ruining a large resource that would have a large impact on many people, particularly the Standing Rock Sioux. According to Time Magazine, “The pipeline would travel underneath the Missouri River, the primary drinking water source for the Standing Rock Sioux, a tribe of around 10,000 with…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The history of Native Americans is entirely made up of violence since then, as the hostile government policies of today and demolition of cultural identities further strip what were problems since the 1830s and beyond. The Standing Rock Sioux fear the pipeline will pollute their drinking water, and claim that it will disturb ancient burial grounds and has violated the terms of a prior 1851…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dakota Access Pipeline has received a lot of attention in the media for the past several months and once again constitute a polemic topic in our nation. It is hard for the U.S. government to understand the value and to even know which places are sacred for Native Americans. However, I believe by now U.S government should better understand their religion and beliefs. I mean they acknowledge that it’s a consistent problem they face, As legal scholar Stephen Pevar tells us, in the article named“Native American Relgiion and Dakota Access Pipeline Crisis: “There is no federal statute that expressly protects Indian sacred sites…. in fact, the federal government knowingly desecrates sites.”…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Winona LaDuke, a Native American activist, stated, “In the end, there is no absence of irony: the integrity of what is sacred to Native Americans will be determined by the [U.S] government that has been responsible for doing everything in its power to destroy Native American cultures” (cite). This paper argues that the Dakota Access Pipeline is represented in the media as government intrusion and exploitation of Native Americans through environmental racism. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is 1,172 miles long and made to carry oil from North Dakota to southern Illinois; however, this project is controversial, sparking protests, due to it crossing the drinking water source of the Standing Rock Sioux, a Native American tribe. The first news…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States’ has been using oil to fuel the needs of people and businesses for an extensive period of time. The country’s reliance on oil is a huge factor in maintaining the stability of the country. Though many advocate as to why the Keystone XL Pipeline will leave a positive impact on the country through economic prosperity and secured borders, many are consumed by the thoughts of potential damages and…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tribe and its supporters have enacted the essence of peaceful resistance and that is why their cause has received national media attention. Hundreds of supports are arrested per week, and the protesters have accused police of unnecessarily harsh treatment, including the use of pepper spray on protesters and rubber bullets. When faced with government and local aggression, the Sioux and their supporters have continued their peaceful resistance, and in true Dr. King fashion, have not yet wavered in the face of physical or emotional injuries. As the Sioux fight the good fight…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the Standing Sioux Rock Tribe is protesting the Dakota Access oil pipeline which is supposed to span 1,100 miles across North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa. In this case the protestors are also worried about contamination of their sacred water…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays