Standing Neutral In Machiavelli's The Prince

Improved Essays
In The Prince by Machiavelli, he brings up points in the way you should lead there are some to comply to and others not to, one strong point is that you should never stay neutral in a time a war, one not strong point is that you shouldn't have a lot of flatters.
If you are a leader and you stay neutral in a time of war then you will not gain favor, money, land, nor powerful allies. When one of the sides you pick wins you can gain a powerful ally who can help you take over land and can give you resources you gained from that land. If you have powerful allies than you can gain power throughout the world because you and that state can grow together. If the person you pick loses then you gain an ally who is strong at your back, and they will always be there because you backed them at a time when they were vulnerable. .”A prince is also respected when he is either a true friend or a downright enemy,” (Machiavelli PG. 108). “he declares himself in favour of one party against the other; which course will always be more advantageous than standing neutral; because if two of your powerful neighbours come to blows, they are of such a character that, if one of them conquers, you have either to fear him or not. In either case it will always be more advantageous for you to declare yourself and to make war strenuously;”(Machiavelli PG. 108) So they will always be by your side
…show more content…
If you see a small war going on with two weak states that are fighting to no avail. Then you can back one side and if your side wins than you pretty much control that land because without you than they would be weak once again. Lastly

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Vincent Barnett's article that interprets Machiavelli's "The Prince" was intriguing. Many readers were shocked about Machiavelli's guide to be a leader, but he was only telling the truth. To be a successful leader, Machiavelli proposes that "the end justifies the means. " Machiavelli's critical manual was meant to appeal to leaders to reach their goal for the greater good.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli’s intentions are clear from the very beginning, the dedication of the book to Lorenzo de’ Medici, the ruler of Florence. The Prince is not particularly hypothetical or abstract, its prose is transparent and its logic incomplex. These attributes underline Machiavelli’s desire to provide coherent, efficient understandable advice. In his book, “The Prince,” Machiavelli stated that a good ruler should not only mirror previous great rulers and seek advice when needed “the prince must read histories and in them study the deeds of great men; he must examine the reasons for their victories and for their defeats in order to avoid the latter” (The prince, XIV), but he should also devote himself to the military operations and preserve power distinctly, and not to mention defeat or eradicate possible threats such as political conflicts and potential enemies.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written in the excerpt from The Morals of the Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, being a political philosopher of the Renaissance, analyzes the ideal qualities and the real qualities of princes. According to his excerpt, paragraph seven lies under the subtitle “On Cruelty and Clemency: Whether It Is Better To Be Loved or Feared”. Base on the subtitle, it can be inferred that the following sections will discuss whether a prince should be loved or feared by his people. In paragraph seven of the excerpt, the author states the following: “to be feared is much safer than to be loved.” As stated in the quote, Machiavelli believes that a prince should rule his people with fear because love has harmful consequences.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It appears that Machiavelli’s purpose in writing The Prince was to eventually gift it to Lorenzo the Magnificent as a means of securing good favor from him. As to why he chose to write a novel as opposed to the more commonplace tribute of either gold or some other finery, the most feasible conclusion is that Machiavelli wished to indirectly guide Lorenzo in how he thinks his job should be done. Machiavelli wanted Lorenzo to implement the strategies detailed in The Prince so that Lorenzo may eventually garner even more power and prestige; in the hopes that one day Lorenzo would repay Machiavelli’s kindness by relieving him of his suffering and misfortune. In terms of more noble goals, Machiavelli hoped that the Medicis would use his knowledge…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To reiterate on the “honest politician,” he must first learn “how not to be good.” On one hand, the honest politician may say that “in order for change to really occur, one must work hard and be educated in order to generate income.” On the other hand, your the “not so honest” competitor may say that “they will change this one problem in our economy which will generate random mass amounts of money to everyone.” As strange as that may seem, the honest politician will get no votes, therefore the dishonest politician will be elected. Machiavelli’s use of ethos in this quote and throughout the entirety of the passage, in order to appeal to the audience’s sense of right and…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Machiavelli's Summary

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    PART A. IDENTIFICATIONS 3. “This division of labor, from which so many advantages are derived, is not originally the effect of any human wisdom…it is the necessary consequence of a certain propensity in human nature…to truck, barter and exchange one thing for another.” Adam Smith (pg.21) - In this quote, Adam Smith introduces the idea that although the specialization of skills in division of labor leads to efficiency when it comes to production, this is bad for the people because they lose other skills. People are so focused on their specialty that their other skills are not improved upon and start to deteriorate so they become good for one thing, their specialty.…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature can be described as the general feelings and behavioral traits shared by all of mankind. It is what sets us apart from other species. For example, humans are self-centered, social, manipulative, compassionate, empathetic, and have a complex language consisting of sarcasm, jokes and gossip. These are just a few items in a lengthy list of what makes a human. The idea of human nature has been in existence for a long time and has been studied and theorized by many important people such as Karl Marx, Plato, and Aristotle.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays