Stand Your Ground Law In The Early 1900's

Improved Essays
Ohio’s castle law gives citizens legal right to self-defense. If you feel threatened, if an intruder comes in your house or vandalizes your property you have the legal right to use the castle law in the proper situation. You have the right to use self-defense, when you feel like your life is on the line. Such as an intruder coming in your house with a weapon or someone trying to steal your car while you are sitting in a traffic jam. This is why everyone that has a clean record should have their concealed carry permit, so anyone can protect their self if any of these situations happen to them. Ohio passes the “ stand your ground” law in the early 1900’s. This law is just a section off of the castle law doctrine, which means you can “ stand your …show more content…
This is not the case the castle law should be used because their life was not put on the line. The castle law should only being used when a person’s life is put on the line or being threatened in a life or death situation. If the person that uses very forceful actions when they are not needed, they should be prosecuted because the castle law is not written up that way. The castle law should only be used when a person is defending their personal property or their family. Someone shouldn’t be able to claim they used the castle law when a stranger starts to yell at them because of bad driving or cutting in line at a food court. The person that thinks they have the right to use the castle law in these situations should be prosecuted. They should have enough respect for other humans, to try to be civil and work things out with the person that is trying to make a scene. It creates a presumption of self-defense when force is used against an intruder in one’s home or vehicle. Under the old law, the burden was on the defendant to prove that they acted in self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence. The intruder is actually is an intruder, this means the person whom forced is being used against does not have a lawful right or privilege to be in that home or vehicle. If someone comes in your house or your vehicle you …show more content…
You can use deadly force to protect yourself as long as the intruder has a weapon or is threatening you, to where you feel like that person is going to harm you or your family. A person should not be punished for protected their home or personal belongings, especially if you feel threatened. There is no point in getting shot for living in your own home when an intruder comes in threatening you with your life, you should be able to protect yourself with whatever it takes to keep you and your family safe. Why should you get in trouble for pulling the trigger first? It is written up in the castle doctrine that you basically have to let the person that is trying to harm you make the first move, when sometimes that person might have a gun or a deadly weapon and the first move is not always something that you can come back from. If the intruder has a gun or a knife they might make the first move by shooting or stabbing you which means you might be dead or badly wounded. So what is the point in taking the chance of getting yourself hurt just to take the first action? It should be wrote that if someone comes in your house without invitation or trying to harm someone in household that you being the home owner should be able to make the first move, because you are the owner of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some can also access your home through the gate. You should always take precautions so that you avoid losses. Those are some of the things that you should know about locks and home security. Do not relent. Protect your loved ones and your property and you will not…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, in response to the complaint, the name “self defense” would be void if someone used it for violence. Self defense is defined by its own words as the protection of the individual by the individual alone. Attacking others based on being able to is not the right philosophy in learning self defense. Those who use the name self defense to learn how to inflict pain on others should not have been taught in the first place. One is able to spot the these people by how they act throughout the practice.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the off chance that a guilty party sees a sign before a home that expresses that the house is secured with a wellbeing caution framework, they will be more averse to burglarize that home, since the odds of getting got is expanded. There ought to likewise be blinds or draperies in your entryways and in the windows, so that individuals outside can 't see your home, in light of the fact that if…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this case, once Ray declared that he was going to kill Janay. This can be considered as an exigent circumstance which is when officers immediately take action in order to make an arrest. In Brigham City, Utah v Charles Stuart, the court believed that under exigent circumstances, police should be allowed to enter a suspect’s home without a warrant. This established imminent danger as one of these circumstances. In Wilson v Arkansas, the knock and announce rule was used because the plantiff’s home was searched without letting him know it was the police.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defense of justification is when there is imminent danger and police are not there to protect you. For example somebody broke into your home at night with a weapon and you do what you have to do to protect yourself. Defense of excuse is when someone knows what they did was wrong, but they are not responsible. If the defendant had a mental disease, was just a little kid when the incident took place or acted under duress. You can use self-defense to prevent death or serious bodily harm, if you are in fear of your life.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The castle doctrine is a doctrine that allows you to permit people who have been assaulted in their home by an trespasser to stand their ground and use such force as reasonable and necessary to defend themselves. The castle doctrine does not require a lawful occupant in the home to retreat when they are confronted by a tresspassing person or a person that isn’t residing in that home or property.As for stand your ground a homeonwer has a reasonsable fear of imminent peril or death whenever another person is unlawfully and forcefully enters a dwelling, Either way if you look at it the main difference is one protects you to defend yourself if threated and other deals with you defending your home. if your state has a Stand Your Ground Law then you do not have a duty to retreat if assaulted in any place you have the right to be, including public areas. If your state only has a Castle Law, then this only applies when you’re in your home (or in some states, your vehicle). An example for castle doctrine is it sometimes does not apply to conflicts between two people who live in the same house.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Had she opened that door, the burglar could have burst through, and she would have been the victim of a burglary. The rubber trick is good for everyone to be aware of, and you want to share it because you could save someone from becoming the victim of a home burglary. If something doesn't feel right, remember to exercise caution. You do not want to be overly trusting of people. In many cases, the best route is to call the police if you find suspicious activity near your home.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effects of gun control I feel could be very dangerous. Taking away the right to bear arms could endanger defenseless families when an armed criminal breaks into their house. Taking firearms off of the legal market doesn’t mean that they still won’t be bought and sold illegally. An example of something that is illegal but widely bought and sold would be drugs. They are highly illegal but the demand for them is through the roof.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the probationer doesn’t want to cooperate then the police officer can arrest them for violating the probation order. The difference between a probation officer and police officer is the officer must follow the fourth amendment to search a probationer’s home. Probation officers can search the home without a warrant if it states they can in the probation order. The fourth Amendment is acceptable in this situation due to they are following protocol of this law. If it wasn’t followed they would be breaking the law and violating the rights that the individual…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stand Your Ground

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It does not matter whether you had the possibility to retreat or not, so long as it is reasonable to consider the situation a hazard to your life or a threat of great bodily harm. I think it is entirely reasonable to be able to fight back in a life or death situation. People should be encouraged to fight back if their life should come into danger. To be honest, in George Zimmerman’s position, if a hooded figure came at me, I would use any force or means necessary to defend myself. Stereotype or not, generally when a person wears a hood and is sneaking around at night, it is because they do not want their face to be seen as they commit a crime.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays