Stahl defines the revolution by its demands. He outlines these as popular sovereignty, freedom, equality, separation of church and state, and a charter, or constitution. These align with the principles of liberalism and rationalism, which Stahl denounces blasphemous. Stahl view the revolution as a political sin, specifically that humankind are turning their backs on the lord. He believes the revolution, derived from the ideal of rationalism, has cause man to “push God off His throne and place himself on his chair” (Stahl, 7). Stahl rejects the notion of liberalism, and instead finds his views deeply nestled in traditionalism. Stahl believes in the organically grown systems of the Ancien Regime, stating that “rationalism and revolution are not constant” (Stahl, 7). He argues that the organic progression of the rigid class system in place during the Ancien Regime are apart of God’s plan, and therefore, by
Stahl defines the revolution by its demands. He outlines these as popular sovereignty, freedom, equality, separation of church and state, and a charter, or constitution. These align with the principles of liberalism and rationalism, which Stahl denounces blasphemous. Stahl view the revolution as a political sin, specifically that humankind are turning their backs on the lord. He believes the revolution, derived from the ideal of rationalism, has cause man to “push God off His throne and place himself on his chair” (Stahl, 7). Stahl rejects the notion of liberalism, and instead finds his views deeply nestled in traditionalism. Stahl believes in the organically grown systems of the Ancien Regime, stating that “rationalism and revolution are not constant” (Stahl, 7). He argues that the organic progression of the rigid class system in place during the Ancien Regime are apart of God’s plan, and therefore, by