Splitting Of Rome: The Fall Of The Roman Empire

Superior Essays
Splitting of the Roman Empire
The fall of Roman empire started from about AD 190. It was attacked by tribes such as the Goths and the Vandal and Civil wars in the empire further weakened rule. Rome also experienced a succession of poor emperors who were not capable of doing their jobs. The emperor Diocletian knew that something had to be done or the empire would disintegrate. He decided to divide the Roman Empire in half creating Western Empire and Eastern Empires, each with own leader. However, Diocletian now faced other problems. More military defenses had to be built across the empire costing large sums of money. To pay for these, taxes were increased and extra coins were minted leading to inflation. In AD 307, Constantine became
…show more content…
They allowed for swift movement of goods, information and armies across their territories and tighten grasp around their empire. As Legions conquered through Europe they built highways connecting newly capture cities. With roads linking through out the empire, military could out maneuver enemies. It also meant that all parts of the Empire could be brought in goods and reinforced by army efficiently. The Roman builders and engineers crafted the roads durability and easy navigation in mind. Roads were constructed with many cemented layers and also with adjacent ditches to ensure water drainage. As they made their way down the road travelers can guide themselves by stone pillars that acted as a detailed collection of mile markers. They provided distance toward nearest town and best rest stops as roads are aligned with statewide hotels, way stations, and horse changing stations. Allowing the legions to move quickly and over a longer distances. Therefore they can respond to outside and internal uprising swiftly. Roads were also well protected to protect traveling merchants and armies by manned police posts and towers that kept eyes out in remote in isolated areas , and functioned as toll collectors. Not all roads were, taxing goods and issuing fees, but they brought in steady revenue for the …show more content…
Each Society had a written law code to abide and possess similar powers. Systems were both adopted to prevent branches of government getting stronger than the other, such as the checks and balances and the veto, in which the idea was taken by the US government from the Roman Empire. Any law that seems unreasonable or greedy or unfair to the populous would be a set aside by the Romans, similarly to the US declaring a law unconstitutional. Both also and individual freedoms like the trial by jury and the right of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Back then if you have more land it means that you have more power, more power means you can control more. The Romans built an effective transportation system that was used solely for their military. However, it was later proven that the roads were used for expansion on land. In document 2 it states, “The military nature of the roads continued to be essential as Romans expanded into territory outside of Italy.” The expansion increased the number of slave labor and the gap between the rich and the poor grew.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roads in Roman territory were used for trade as well. On Roman roads, agricultural goods were usually traded. These roads helped merchants make good money and in general united the Roman Empire. Romans used water trade too and they used the Mediterranean sea for that. Both empires flourished economically because of their road systems and trade.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Empire Dbq Essay

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman’s realized they needed better roads because they had to be able to travel quickly throughout the empire in order to control its newly conquered people’s. Consequently, good roads meant that orders, troops, and supplies could be sent quickly throughout the empire. In times of peace, it meant increased trade and taxes for the Roman government.” The Romans adapted to the terrain they took over, realizing they needed sturdier roads to more effectively transport people and goods. In order to do this, they used a device called a Groma to ensure that they were straight.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rising above all places with strength and large amounts of conquered land, is Rome . The once sturdy place of Rome , fell due to various reasons. What were some primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire? Political Instability as well as civic and economic decay caused the fall of the Roman Empire. Although both of those helped aid the fall for Rome the main cause for the fall was the military mistakes.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The romans had slightly elevated the center of the roads…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the large size of the empire, communication was difficult. Roads and linking towns provided as a network for commerce, administrative bases and connecting the…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pax Romana refers to the time of 27 BCE to 180 CE in the Roman Empire. It literally translates to “Roman peace”. During this time there was unprecedented peace and economic prosperity throughout the Empire which spanned from England in the north to Morocco in the south and Iraq in the east. During the Pax Romana, the Roman Empire reached its peak in terms of land territory, and its population was approximately seventy million people. Rome’s citizens were relatively secure, and the government maintained law, order, and stability (ushistory.org).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are stark differences between the time period and society of both America and Rome, there are also analogous similarities between both societies. But nethertheless, America and Rome do not have the same fate considering the fact that America has learned the lessons of the past, the country 's democratic ideals…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two aspects of the Roman politics and culture change noticeably; the rise of Christianity, and the division of the empire which ended with an Eastern and a Western Roman Empire. Christianity altered the Roman lifestyle, while the decentralization of the Empire left Western Europe without a strong political system until the formation of the Holy Roman Empire. Although these changes marked the beginning of the Byzantine Empire, an important continuity shaped the Byzantine political attitude; the conservation of the Greco-Roman laws and ideas. When the Roman Empire split during the 3rd century, it was having both internal and external conflicts, unable to control its vast lands. The majority of the internal conflicts were caused by the shifting in religious practices and beliefs amongst the citizens, of which Christianity was a part of.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under 75 years, the Western Roman Empire had 20 emperors. Government corruption made the problem bigger because the Praetorian Guard, which are supposed to be the Emperors body guards, helped assassinating the emperors and once even auctioned off the role to the person with the highest bid. This was a problem because the trust of the people for their leadership worsened and worsened because of this. Some social and economical problems also contributed to the decline of the Western Roman Empire. For example, when Emperor Diocletian divided the Roman Empire into two parts (the Western and Eastern parts), the Western Empire took a huge blow because they got less of the wealthy provinces than the Eastern empire.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    This caused the debt of the country to increase. Another problem was feudalism. Rome was in a system that the land was given out to the people below you. Those people would give out a smaller portion to the people below them, and so on. The people of Rome were divided into classes, and whatever class you were in, you stayed in.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because the roads were paved, the citizens thought that Rome would last forever, so the empire had to build and have strong roads that wouldn’t have to be repaired often, if at all. Although, because the roads were so elaborate and well built, Rome was able to hold on to their Empire for a long time before it collapsed. With paved roads, traders didn’t have to worry about potholes or washouts, because concrete doesn’t…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fall of the ‘Western Roman Empire’ was caused by a number of internal and external factors spread over more than a century. Their are many theories providing an explanation for the the fall of the empire and pinpointing the beginning of its decay, however one of the most accepted theories begins in the reign of Emperor Constantine (306-337 A.D) and his part in the split of the Roman Empire into two ‘West’ and ‘East’ regions and ends with the abdication of Romulus Augustus in 475 A.D. Responsibility is also given to the many waves of barbarians migrating into and pillaging the outer regions of the Western Empire, as well as widespread corruption, economic and social issues within the empire. The theory of government corruption having a…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Were the Primary Reasons For the “Fall” of Rome ? Have you ever wondered why Rome fell? Crash! Rome fell mostly because the people that were lazy and careless. Then there was also an outbreak of disasters.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Economy Essay

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The leaders of Rome were not just concerned about direct economics, they were also concerned with the laws of economics. Roman law prohibited senators from getting into trade and business. This allowed for the members of the Senate to completely focus on necessary laws, and ensured that the Senators’ decisions did not interfere with their investments. Although this law existed, the rich still controlled the…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays