Compare And Contrast The Battle Of Thermopylae

Superior Essays
Since early history, the concept of conquering vast amounts of land to either establish or expand an empire has been very prominent. One of the biggest part of any empire and their success relies greatly on its military system, as it is crucial in protecting their land and keeping invaders and rebellions away. While most of the empires had similar military strategies and battle techniques, some of them progressed over time and advanced to newer, better technologies that would aid them during war. The pass of Thermopylae, a famous battle fought between the Greek polis Sparta versus the Persians shows how these new technologies and battle strategies, at that time, were advantageous or disadvantageous to different empires. The Spartans had a strong …show more content…
When the Greeks heard that the Persians are attacking them again, they decide to try and stop the overwhelming number of Persian soldiers in Thermopylae (See Fig. 2). The Spartans decide on this location as it was a narrow field in between mountains which would limit the number of Persian soldiers who could be there. Having geographical knowledge about the land, the Spartans were able to hold off the Persians for seven days. Leonidas, one of the Sparta king was able to keep “most of his force together at the pass, grouped in their national units in the in the normal manner…” holding off the Persians from advancing further. By holding off the Persians at Thermopylae, the Spartans were able to drastically cut down the number of Persian soldiers they would be facing during battle. The Spartans attacked the Persians as a unit by using the phalanx formation, and this left fewer soldiers exposed resulting is lower casualties. Starting training at a young age was very beneficial the the Spartan soldiers because this made them fiercer and better fighters. Their loyalty to Greece and fighting for its independence made them very motivated and wanting to fight to death. Unfortunately, the Persians still vastly outnumbered the Spartans and the numbers alone was enough for them to be victorious and move on to conquer the rest of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Athens and Sparta were both Greek city-states that played major roles from the beginning of time. But, Athens could not compare with Sparta in terms of military power. Sparta was a militaristic society, meaning that the Spartan community largely focused on the troops in order to have a strong fighting force. The military was in charge of a Spartan citizen’s life from the moment they were born. When a Spartan child was born, they…

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Frank Miller’s 300 is both a graphic novel and a film adaptation by Zach Snyder. Both serve as a story telling of the famed battle of the pass at Thermopylae previously told by Herodotus. It tells of the Spartan King Leonidas bravely leading 300 Spartan warriors against the very large Persian army. Frank Miller details the story of the strong but grossly outnumbered Spartans, the story’s obvious underdog. The Persian army according to history was in the recent business of acquiring land by force or submission. Forcing kings and civilizations to bend at the knee to their God/King Xerxes or to lay their land to waste and be slaughtered. The Persian Army at the time had the agenda of acquiring all of Greece as a part of their territory. The Spartans…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Sparta

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Athens might have thought that they were superior to Sparta in all areas, but they only surpassed Sparta in intellect. In the context of survival, Sparta’s army trumped Athens’ superior intellect in many ways. They demonstrated that their army was one of the most powerful forces of the time by using the geographical features of the land to their advantage, training and sustaining healthy soldiers, and, in the end, defeating one of the most respected and supported city-states of ancient Greece. The fact that Sparta was able to use the possibility of attacking Athens by land during the Peloponnesian War to their advantage indicates that they had strong military strategies that were of higher rank than their neighbor. By having a government in which no singular individual was in rule within the city-state of Athens, the leaders of this civilization were not able to put the majority of their work and effort into military strategy, leading to the end of Athenian reign over the Greek world. Athens put their focus more towards education and the sciences, which they did not fully accept due to the religious practices of the region, and therefore wasted time and resources on a cause which they didn’t have complete faith in. One thing that the Spartans believed in wholeheartedly was the application of hard work and dedication. From an early age, soldiers and commanders trained and taught…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sparta Dbq Analysis

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 5th century, a Greek city state named Sparta came and rivaled Athens. Sparta rivaled Athens because they have strength, discipline and obedience with their army, which sometimes is not a very good thing. (Background Essay). Many Greek settlements had to fight to survive, which Sparta did. I believe that the weakness outweighed the strengths. How did Sparta do this, how did they manage fighting for rivalry? One reason how they did this was with a strong, obedient army. Sparta had a formation called a phalanx, this consisted of strong, tight soldiers, interlocked with each other holding shields, with each man carrying a short sword. That was not the most important thing on how they rivaled, they rivaled because they have a army, that is obedient and strong.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Greek strategy overcame the sheer size of the Persian Army; utilizing the terrain around them and their men, the Greeks experienced great success in places like Marathon, the Straits of Salamis, and Mycale. However, the Persian’s over reliance on the size of their forces and some crucial battlefield mistakes, like the order to assault at Plataea, greatly aided the Greeks in their…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According the battle told by Herodotus, the Spartans used a plan to take on a set amount of Persian troops, limiting the usage of the whole Persian army; Leonidas was able use mountain pass to execute this plan. The same tactics can be seen in the movie. The Spartans formed up in a mountain pass known as the “Hot Gates” where they would take on several waves of Persian troops. The Persians had less armour, making them more susceptible than the Spartans; this can be seen in the movie. The shape and type of weapons used by each side was also fairly accurate. The Persian infantry used bows and arrows as their main weapon. They usually used them on the open plains, which did not make them as effective in the mountain pass. The Spartan attack strategy of a phalanx was also accurate to the story told by Herodotus. The small inaccuracies seen in the movie were “comic book” changes such as strange creatures that were only implemented to grab the viewer’s attention, which only appeared in very small times. These were overshadowed by the larger, accurate concepts of the…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Battle Of Thermopylae

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I believe that there were 350,000 Persian foot soldiers fighting. I have based this conclusion off of Document D, which included reliable evidence relating to the water resources and the realisticness of how many soldiers could be supported. To go more in depth, although Document C also makes a point regarding the water supply; Document D informs us of the man-made reservoirs that would’ve allowed more than 250,000 men to travel along the route. With over one million soldiers, “It would be physically impossible to march that many men along the roads available...” Furthermore, the author of Document D, Rupert Matthews, has written over 200 books on history, which proves that he is more knowledgeable in that…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Sparta Strengths

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My final, major point why the strengths outweigh the weaknesses is the lack of education. According to Doc C., the Spartans learned to read and write for practical reasons, but all other forms of education they banned from the country, books and treatises being included in this as much as foreign languages.In Doc. E, it explains that there was lack of academic intelligence and mostly there was only physical education. Women were needed to do physical education when they were pregnant to produce healthy…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Athens received much honour and glory for the Persian defeat dramatically increasing Athens reputation, especially with Sparta’s absence from the field. It was also an important moral victory for Greece as 10 000 Athenians and 1000 Boeotians defeated a Persian force almost three time larger of 25 000 infantry and 5000 cavalry. This showed the rest of Greece that victory against the much larger Achaemenid empire was far from impossible. The victory at Marathon can be largely attributed to Miltiades and the significant impact the battle had altered the course of the war leading to Greek victory.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that there were about 260,000-300,000 Persian men in the Battle of Thermopylae. Document A states that there were around 2,000,000 men. However, this evidence doesn’t provide the logical answer. A small pass would not be able to supply enough water, food, and space for 2,000,000 men. Matthews’ evidence in Document D provides an obvious factor that the other documents failed to bring up. The environment couldn’t possibly have supported over 400,000 men let alone 2 million. In Document A Herodotus broke down all the parts of the Persian military involved in the entire war, while we’re just looking for the small battle which was a fraction of the military. Secondly, Herodotus provides no sturdy evidence to support his claim.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Spartan army was much stronger comparing to Athens army. By 500 BC, Sparta was recognized by other Greeks as the most powerful city-state. The Spartan phalanx is an unstoppable military force, almost like a human tank a wall of Spartan soldiers. Considering the fact that almost all of the other Greeks thought that Sparta was the most powerful city-state, shows that the Spartan army must've been incredibly stronger to gain so much power and it being known by other Greeks. The Spartan phalanx was a military tactic which was a formation of many spartan men using spears as weapons. Sparta was a military based civilization, while Athens was more focused on the effect of public speaking meaning that Sparta had more focus on military and army purposes. Sparta was a better model of civilization than Athens because the army was much stronger , women had more rights during that time period and the government is more stable.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They had fought for days and lost thousands of men but had not made any progress in their invasion. The Persian king brought out a prisoner (or it was a traitor who came on his own free will, the story is disputed) who was tortured and asked for information regarding the battle. The prisoner (or traitor) told the Persians about a small trail above Thermopylae that only the local farmers knew about. It would allow the Persians to sneak up on the Greeks from behind and corner them in the pass of Thermopylae. Sometime during the night, the Kings Guard (the Persian kings elite soldiers) followed the secret pass and ambushed the Greeks. Leonidas, the Spartan king, decided that he and his Spartans would fight until the end to allow the other Greeks to escape. When the Greeks had escaped, the Spartans knew this would be their last battle. Their weapons were in ruin, they were tired, hungry, and wounded, but they still fought on. The fighting got so savage at one time that the Spartans used their hands, teeth, sticks, and rocks to fight back the Persians. Eventually, the Spartan were backed into a corner and shot with volley upon volley of arrows until they all died. Even though the Spartans died, their deaths inspired the other Greeks to fight for…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae, was a battle between the Greeks and the Persians. Thermopylae was a mountain pass which led to many Greek cities. It was a part of the second invasion of the Persian Empire. The Persians invaded Greek cities to control more land. The Persian Empire was led by Xerxes, he ordered the attack. The Greeks cities fought against the Persians, the most know was Sparta. Sparta only had 300 solders called Spartans. The Spartans fought as a single unit, they were led by King Leonidas. Leonidas I lead the 300 Spartans and about 100,000 other Greek soldiers to fight in the Battle of Thermopylae. They were ready to fight the Greeks with full force. Xerxes was surprised that they were ready. On 480 BC, is when the battle began, the first wave of Persians charged at the Spartans, the Spartans began to…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the next 400 years, the Greeks developed democracy, theater, poetry and (way of thinking/related to learning about how people think), as well as rediscovered written language. Some time before 650 BC, they developed the group of (possibly armed) people, and their warriors and war fighting itself began to change also. War fighting in Greece had always been commanded (or spoke so someone copied down what was said) by the land; the rough ground was no good for (two-wheeled, horse-drawn vehicles). In earlier times when their (other people of about the same age) developed (two-wheeled, horse-drawn vehicle) war fighting, Greek warriors concentrated on heavy infantry. Besides Thessaly, the Greeks also not paid attention to the development of cavalry in their military. However, their concentration on heavy infantry would pay off in the power of their hoplite warriors and group of (possibly armed) people (creation and construction/ group of…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Convinced by members of his court and his brother-in-law, Xerxes started to plan revenge on the Greeks for his father’s defeat at Marathon. Since he wanted a full-scale invasion, preparations for the upcoming campaign took three years. As Xerxes prepared to march, his subjects finished bridging Hellespont. Before he could use the bridge, a great storm wrecked the bridge sending Xerxes into a rage. He ordered that the designers of the bridges be executed and that the Hellespont be given 300 lashes as punishment . Finally, a decade after the battle at Marathon, Xerxes begins to move towards Greece. As Xerxes started his journey, many Greek city-states offered up “earth and water” as tokens of submission. However, much like they did previously, Sparta and Athens refused to submit to Persian rule. In 480 B.C.E. at the battle of Thermopylae, the great Persian army faced off with Spartan forces. In the famous Spartan story, King Leonidas led 6,000 men –with 300 of Sparta’s elite hoplites – to hold the pass at Thermopylae, so that the Persian army could not advance to Athens . Despite their great numbers, the Persian army was no match for the Spartan forces on their own. At that point, however, a traitor named Ephialtes offered to show the Persian King an alternative route that would allow them to attack the Spartans from behind. The…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics