Discuss Trotsky's Criticism Of The Soviet Bureaucracy

Superior Essays
One of Tsarist Russia’s hallmarks, apart from its autocratic power, was its reliance on a bureaucracy to implement imperial policies. By nature, autocracies like Russia lacked the political interest groups a weaker, decentralized state might rely on to carry out political policies. As a result, Tsarist Russia relied on the bureaucracy to fill this void and carry out its orders. As a result, members of the bureaucracy didn’t just implement orders; they formed the country’s political elite, and were rewarded with economic privileges. The political and economic power invested in these elites was clearly described by Custine when he wrote:

“Russia is governed by a class of subaltern employees, transferred direct from the public schools to
…show more content…
Therefore, Trotsky’s criticism might have been a product of axe grinding on his part. However, Trotsky was not the only famous critic of the Soviet Union to raise concerns that the Bolshevik party had replaced the bureaucratic elites of pre-revolutionary Russia. Milovan Djilas raised similar criticisms when he wrote, “In practice, the ownership privilege of the new class manifests itself as an exclusive right, as a party monopoly, for the political bureaucracy to distribute national income” (Djilas, pg 44). Djilas went on to write that the “Party control over society, identification of the government and governmental machinery with the party, and the right to express ideas dependent on the amount of power and the position one holds in the hierarchy; these are the essential and inevitable characteristics of every Communist bureaucracy” (Djilas, pg 78). Djilas leveled accusations against the Communist parties in all the Eastern-bloc and Soviet Union that were similar to Trotsky’s, namely that Communist parties had economic privileges and elite status because they had total control over society. In short, it’s clear that Trotsky’s criticisms had at least some legitimacy, because other famous apostates repeated them. But apart from relying on a bureaucratic elite to carry out its will, the Soviet Union also relied on a police state where terror was spread generously throughout society. The use of violence to terrorize society was not a Soviet innovation because it was also used in Tsarist

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He instituted acts of terror to prevent any rebellions against his rule, including purges and the gulags. Stalin created the NKVD, which was a secret police force. This force was established to catch and punish anyone who spoke against Stalin or his rule. People who spoke against him, were Christians, or posed a threat to anyone in Stalin’s government were eliminated during Stalin’s many purges. The whole point of Marxism was to end suffering and oppression and Stalinism was the exact…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soviet Union Dbq Analysis

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Soviet Union was a communist monster and to many, an enemy. After World War I came the Russian Revolution and then the Soviet Union was born. Throughout the following 70 years, it advanced to be known as a world “superpower” which left many marks on the world history of the 20th century. Russia remains, but the 15 Soviet Republics are all independent today. The highs and lows of Soviet Union brings an eventful past in which students are able to gain knowledge.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote, “It is my great desire to reform my subjects, and yet I am ashamed to confess that I am unable to reform myself,” from Peter the Great, shows the sophistication he possessed, and also reflects the attention that he gave to Russia in order to reform it into a better society. Obviously, since he was called Peter “the Great,” he must have influenced history. This is shown through the fact that he was mainly successful in completely overhauling Russia and its economy, government, and society and left a lasting impression that the world would forever feel. Before discussing the breakthroughs that Peter brought, it is also important to note how he rose to power. He was born in Moscow in 1672, with the name of Pyotr Alekseyevic.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The October Revolution: Coup or Social Uprising? Historians along the century have questioned the veracity of the narrative the Bolsheviks fed to the people of Russia and the rest of the world. These historians claim that the communist party has distorted the facts of said revolution to control masses during the Soviet reign. The overthrow of the Provisional Government in October 1917 was both a Bolshevik-engineered coup d’état and a popular revolution. Chroniclers have debated this statement owing to the fact that said people come from different socio-political backgrounds and the varying historiographies of individual authors.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1682 Peter I of Russia would ascend to the throne of Russia and over the course of his tenure in office execute a series of reforms, that would drastically change the administrative State that had previously existed throughout the empire. In 1855 a distant heir, Alexander II would ascend to the throne and in the footsteps of his predecessor, and in a similar manner, execute similar reforms. Both propelled using European models, both the reforms of Peter and those of Alexander sought to revitalize Russia, in order to make the Empire more successful against European powers. One would succeed and usher in a period of administrative prosperity, that would properly unite Russia under a central authority, the other would result in Russia’s internal…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Russia’s societal construction was one of vast inequity as a result of the attitudes of the Tsar and monarchic rule. The striking disparity in 1847 between the population of peasants, (82%) and the working class (4%) suggests that Russia remained an agrarian society and could not compete with her more economically developed European neighbours. This was caused by a social structure which did not endorse merit. For example, the army’s commissions were bought and sold, rather than…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Baird, Jr. Professor of History at Harvard University and is the author of a variety of books, and this particular essay titled “Did the Russian Revolution Have to Happen?” is the concluding chapter of the forthcoming book, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Pipes describes the revolution as a revolt that derived from the public’s disgust with the crown’s familiarity with Rasputin as well as the Tsar’s mismanagement of the war effort, stating that it was not an event or a process, but a series of disruptive and violent acts. He states that the assault on the monarchy was not undertaken from fatigue from the war, but from the desire for the monarchy to make better efforts. Pipes believes that initially, neither social discontent nor the agitation of radical intelligentsia played any significant role in the abdication of the Tsar . The events of Feburary 1917 demonstrated that the Russian Empire was ultimately an artificial and fragile structure, held together by the policy, army and bureaucracy.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Manifesto of the Communist Party” is Karl Marx and Frederick Engels attempt to elucidate the goals of Communism, and also to the explain the fundamental theory of this movement. It claims that class struggles are the prompt impact behind all historical progress. Class relationships are explained by an era's production. Nevertheless, in the end these connection stop being compatible with the developing forces of production. Thereupon, a revolution occurs and a new class surfaces as the ruling one.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As far as what the developments following the reign of, supposedly, the last one of the “Great” Russian monarchs were and what impeded her successors to thread in the steps of their renowned predecessors, it is clear, in my view, that the subsequent Russian monarchs found it difficult to adapt to the realities of Constitutionalism and the fact that the absolute power did not prove to be relevant anymore, particularly in Europe. Therefore, what was left for Alexander III and Nicholas II was to degenerate and retreat to the Muscovite doctrines justifying the existence of the absolute and omnipotent monarch, while almost patiently awaiting the dissatisfaction of their more progressive and visionary contemporaries to take precedence and erupt, so that the whole autocratic bubble bursts on a par with the Russian monarchy itself. Has actually the autocratic bubble exploded, or despite the Russian empire is no longer officially existent anymore, the autocratic governing model is still present, I believe, is a quite relevant question, which opens up room for further debate. However, in my view, one thing is certain, namely that on the one hand the demarcation between West and East is increasingly exacerbated, and on the other hand that Russia has yet to find the leader who will be willing to critically re-evaluate the different images and the historical…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Snowball A Hero

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout history, in literature, and even in today’s modern world, a myriad of revolutions have occurred to overthrow harsh powers. Certain people take the role to initiate these revolutions to change the style of living for those not living a privileged lifestyle. Any situation requires one who is not satisfied with the status quo, and feels the need to take the extra step further to improve the life for those around them. Leon Trotsky helped to initiate the Russian Revolution, and should be regarded as a hero; similarly, both Snowball from Animal Farm and the Ethiopian Derg lead the revolution of the lower classes and implemented communist ideas into their societies. Leon Trotsky continued the promotion of communism, trying to get rid of classes and make a place where all people…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    “The Russian Revolution of 1917 as a By-Product of Modernization.” Russian Social Science Review 56:1 (2015): 79-95. This argues for the idea that WWI was not the only reason for revolution. It demonstrates that progress made by the working class and peasants gave them an increased sense of autonomy leading to their push away from autocracy.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The end may justify the means as long as there is something that justifies the end.” Leon Trotsky, Their Morals and Ours. An ethical theory is a set of principles that dictates what is right and wrong. Although they stem from morals, they are quite different. Morals are personal and and ethical theory is usually a society based set of morals.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russia was forced to face a mass of alterations during the reign of Alexander II - economic growth, industrialization, the Crimean and Russo-Turkish wars, peasant uprisings, and, most importantly, Alexander II's Great Reforms, which culminated with the emancipation of the serfs. All of these changes contributed to an upheaval of the social structure that Russia had been operating by for centuries. There has always been an imbalance of power between the masses (peasants, serfs) and the gentry, and this was still true, however there were slightly more opportunities for serfs and slightly less rigid lines separating the two and making the social ladder non-exclusive. With this came varying tones of unrest, wishful activism, and overall intellectual…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics