Southern Campaign

Improved Essays
After the battle of Saratoga the British army would suffer a defeat that would incur both an embarrassing defeat and crippling blow when it came to the French entrance into the war. During the Southern Campaigns, the British could contribute their failure of the campaign based on an assumption that the Southern Colonies would provide a strong enough Loyalist volunteer pool to reinforce British regulars to render support against a French invading force, and avoid deploying reinforcements from the European theater. During the beginning phases of operations for the British during the Southern Campaign they would experience success on the battlefield, however on the latter phase of the operation they would be defeated by Continental forces. Both …show more content…
Many Parliamentary members considered giving up the war in the American colonies and turn their attention its neighbors, France and Spain. The adopted strategy by the British would be to focus operations south of the Potomac River. “King George III enthusiastically embraced the concept of a Southern Campaign and outlined the purpose as early as October 1775:
To call forth those who may have a sense of duty to their mother country; to restore British Government… and leave a battalion of provincials formed from the back settlers under the command of the governor to collect such men as may be willing to serve in the British troops in America… Provincial Corps may be left for the protection of the civil
…show more content…
Lord Germain would be the most important asset to the British, he was very versatile in coordinating both military support from the Army and Navy, and a solid communication line with North American theater commanders. The British shifted attention from where the war started because for all intents and purposes this campaign was a stalemate. General Clinton was also not able to engage in heavy combat with Washington, and the British turned to the Southern Campaign strategy in hopes to gain a positive military and political result. Conveniently, by moving forces farther south, reinforcements would be closer to the Caribbean theater to reinforce Cornwallis, and coordinated naval and army operations without strung resources without expanding the size of deployments form the empire. Another strategy for the Southern Campaign was to be able to rotate theater deployments due to seasonal changes. The naval coordination was intended to prevent or decrease the volume of American trade that usually was unloaded in ports such as Charleston, South Carolina. Lastly, British commanders thought that the Southern colonies may have a vast amount of Loyalists who would immediately provide military support once British forces entered those colonies. This strategy in theory would cut down the increase of manpower needed from other operational theaters, and would definitely be more favorable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After successfully capturing key cities in the southern region such as Savannah, Georgia in 1778, and Charleston South Carolina in 1780, the Redcoats had the scent of sweet victory nipping at their noses. The Americans would counter with strategic victories at Kings Mountain, Cowpens, Guilford Courthouse, and the guerrilla fighters that harassed the British supply lines terrified the loyalists of supporting the crown. American’s had control of most of the country and to support the crown meant forfeiting everything that family had and that was something most did not want to sacrifice. Having gambled on the South and lost, the British had to find military success elsewhere.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to the fall of Charleston, General Lincoln was unable to conduct a southern campaign to defend the ever important state of South Carolina.6 General Lincoln made several omissions to his own inability to command a large army and his inability to properly manage a major campaign and blamed it on his lack of command experience.7 He expressed his concerns to both Congress and General Washington, but they in turn blamed General Lincoln for not seeing the bigger picture to the purpose of the campaign and taking in the consideration and interest of the state of South Carolina.8 in addition to General Lincoln’s inability to wage a proper campaign, both the Congress and the state of South Carolina failed to raise and supply General Lincoln with an adequate number to troops to defend the state and its important ports that the British sought to capture.9 With the mix of General Lincoln’s shortcomings and the lack of proper troop support from both Congress and the state of South Carolina created a perfect storm for a long siege of…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He took the focus off of the French West Indies (this sapped British resources). He put the focus on Quebec and Montreal (since they controlled the supply routes into New France). He replaced old, cautious officers with young, daring officers.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot forces had failed attempts to gain a foothold in the Southern colonies at Moore’s Creek Bridge in Charleston in 1776 and a successful capture of Savannah, Georgia at the end of 1778 this gave the British hope that Charleston…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example that Donald gives is the unwillingness of the soldiers to carry anything heavy and they would throw away equipment. The South did not have the luxury to leave behind any weapons and that played into the hands of having limited resources. Other…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Battle of Gettysburg was a very bloody battle that changed America. But was the Battle of Gettysburg the turning point of the Civil War? The Civil War started in the spring of 1861 and ended in 1865. It began mainly because of the differences between the North and the South. The South wanted slavery to expand, while the North wanted to abolish slavery.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    General Sherman moved into the South. He then led his Army of Tennessee and led them on a march to Atlanta, then through Georgia, and then up the East Coast. General Sherman brought the South down by ordering large-scale destruction. The importance of General Sherman's March to the Sea was to first destroy the South’s agreement and ability to continue the war, capture a sea port, and finally to act like allies with General Grant. The reason to act like him and Grant were allies is so he could trap one of the strong Confederate Armies.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There could be both beneficial and disadvantageous effects in having the southern colonies participate in the upcoming war. The same applies to the New England and Middle colonies. The Southern colonies could be a valuable or a poor addition to the war, based on (climate,) socially, economically, and politically structured reasoning. The Southern Colonies have luscious land and rolling hills.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Historians Richard E. Beringer, Herman Hattaway, Archer Jones, and William N. Still Jr. attempt to explain why the South lost the war and look at the excuses and justifications of literature written after the war. Past authors have tried to explain why the North won and the South. A result of this attempt has been the idea of the Lost Cause. They hope through their analysis to show a relationship between the military success, morale, and will and weakness of Confederate nationalism when undermined by battlefield defeat. They also intend to show the effect of the interaction of these factors that created an effect greater than the contributing factors.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the war first started the Americans were at a severe disadvantage, their military and navy were under armed and undermanned due to the earlier policies of the executive branch. Even the militia's were poorly trained. The Americans strategy was lacking, they divided their forces into three groups, each one setting out from different areas, Detroit, Niagara, and Lake Champlain. Each was beaten back by the enemies. The better strategy would of been to attack the English and Canadians at their heart, Montreal.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They looked at Caesar, Hannibal, Alexander, Turenne and Frederick the Great as examples of forces that were able to win despite the odds being stacked against them. (Military Leadership of North and South) However, they did not make the necessary sacrifices that it would have taken to win the war and did not have the brilliant leaders that had allowed Caesar and the others to win. The North did not have incredible military leaders either, but they were still more competent and experienced. One of the generals, Sherman, was positive that they had an advantage over the South with regard to who had the better leaders.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    William Wee Rebellion

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Instead of completely destroying the rebels, General Howe had encouraged the Continental Congress to surrender, which cost Howe to lose the opportunity for a win against the rebels. Thus, buying some time for the rebels to increase their forces during the winter. On the American side, throughout the war the Americans had recruited inexperienced soldiers and who had panicked numerous times or deserted the military way of life (Henretta). The colonies were extremely outnumbered by the British forces, as Britain had their own Navy, German soldiers, tribal Indians and the American Loyalists to support their side of this fight. American armies were no match and inexperienced men.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle Of Saratoga Essay

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Americans winning in the battle was a signal to the Europeans that the colonists of Patriots were capable of defeating the British on their own. More than any other duel, the Battle of Saratoga would prove the outcome of the rest of the war. All in all, the Battle of Saratoga was a great turning point of the war and had a great impact towards the future…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Of 1812 Research Paper

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Along with advantages, there was also plenty of disadvantages, one being that there were barely twelve ships ready for naval battle. There were many small sea battles between the British Navy and American sailors, but one of the most memorable was the ship Chesapeake, which contributed to the United States feelings about war (“An American Perspective of the War of 1812”). Government officials discussed the situations of war (Coles 2). After discussion, President Madison asked, “ For a declaration of war on Britain on four major grounds; impressment of American Seamen, violation of American neutral rights, territorial waters blockade of the New Worlds ports, and British refusal to revoke the order” (Ripley and Tucker 12). England showed much more enthusiasm towards France because of Napoleon and his army (Coles 189).…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South has been such a critical long-term importance in the rise of conservatism for two reasons, which are getting them to prevail and basically racism alone. The South was a long-term importance in getting them to prevail because the White southerners were in control of the South when it came to pretty much everything, like who could and couldn’t sit where they wanted and who could and couldn’t drink from what water fountain. Therefore the South believed that the way things were was the best way and didn’t want to change anything , but Buckly thought the conservatives needed power, so in Why the South Must Prevail they believed that “Wresting the South from the Democrats would be a step toward such power.” Even though Buckly was on the Souths side when it came to race I believe they thought this because according to Platform of the States’ Rights Democratic Party “We affirm that the effective enforcement of such a program would be utterly destructive of the social, economic and political life of the Southern people, and of other localities in which there may be differences in race, creed or national origin in appreciable numbers” and if they took the four southern states back from the Democrats that they would look more powerful and in control.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays