South China Sea Debate Essay

Improved Essays
The events that have taken place over past couple of centuries, and more so the past decade, have monumentally impacted the relationship between China and the United States’ for both better and for worst. Today, China and the U.S. have evolved into two of the most elite super powers, and classify as some of the world’s most prominent leaders in economics, military, technology and overall innovation. Currently, the United States is just weeks away from electing their next president, cyber-attacks are being investigated and analyzed, and the South China Sea Debate is still being disputed. The outcomes of these events will undoubtedly affect the relationship between China and the U.S. over the next 10 years.

Understanding China and U.S.
…show more content…
From China’s perspective, there is no doubt that they firmly believe that the territory is belongs to them, and it always has. However, counter to their view, the United States has supported China’s opponent in the land ownership debate by supporting the Philippians instead. Not only is the U.S. choosing to not support China, they are criticizing the basis of their arguments by stating that China does not have the historical, nor applicable context to justify their argument. The U.S. has taken into account that the “nine-dash line” may be illegitimate and not government official. Also, the United Nations Convention of Law of the Sea(UNCLOS) Ultimately, due to the fact that the United States is not in favor of China coming out on top in the debate, this puts a burden on their relationship as business partners, allies, etc. Commentary toward the issue has suggested the possibility of war in the upcoming decade. However, I do not believe that either country is going to actively pursue war unless it becomes a last resort option. I believe the U.S. and China will try to refrain from going to war because supporting the cause is too expensive, evidently dangerous and both leaders have legitimately expressed their aspirations to preserve and grow a healthy international

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    China is afraid to follow through these tougher sanctions regulations because they do not want their uncooperative ally into a worrisome enemy (Perlez, “China Struggles”). China is worried about that cause because hammering North Korea with heavy sanctions would turn it into a hostile country that could take action against Beijing. But China has already agreed with the United States to make tighter sanctions of North Korea (Sengupta, “U.S. and China “). “However, China’s support for additional sanctions may not translate into the political will necessary in Beijing to enforce restrictions” (Sengupta, “U.S.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the best efforts of the Japanese Ambassadors and American Secretary during negotiations, it seems the path to war had been set. The Japanese believed East Asia would crumble without their support, that they were the stabilizing force. Even while in talks with the Americans, Japan was preparing their Army and Navy for open hostilities. Undeterred by four years of hardship, they took for granted the support of their people in this endeavor. They posited that their demands were weak and should not be met with opposition and supposed the United States had an ulterior motive in regard to China, a key piece in the negotiations.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Especially, Yan Xuetong, a professor at Tsinghua University, was strongly against the peaceful rise. There are several reasons to his argument; Taiwan would attempt to declare independence. Also, there would be many problems with other countries like Japan; Yan argued that the problem was originally resulted from the appeasement and concessions. Hence, China should invest and improve its military in order to defend and threaten the other nations in order to maintain stability and to show China should not be neglected. While China tried to not fall into a trap that China’s rise is a threat, USA kept conjuring up the rise as a threat.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    McKinley was an indecisive leader who was afraid of public opinion and political pressure. President McKinley was in favor of a measured approach and principally thought on a domestic level. Theodore Roosevelt on the other hand, who served under the presidency of McKinley, saw the Spanish war as a great opportunity to show the strength of the United-States to the world. The vision of the McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt administrations on foreign policy was realist, mainly justified by the contingent necessity, the idea that, no matter what, someone will control the islands, so it better be the United-States. However, they did not think of the long term implications of the colonization of these islands, and the United-States did not want the populations to be American for racial reasons.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fred Fleitz Analysis

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fleitz also comments on Middle East allies shifting because of Obama 's “non-policy”. There are several reasons why the allies could be shifting and it is not necessarily because of America 's lack of presence on the ground. He fears for the balance of power because recently Russia is “filling a power vacuum” and they are one of the great powers in the world that could be a huge threat to America if action is taken. He is completely skipping over the the importance of America 's strong relationship with the Syrian rebels and their caution that has been taken to avoid handing missiles directly to ISIS. Because Fleitz has applied the realist lens to his analysis, he has presented the idea that Obama is giving up on the nation…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As said in the article, neo-isolationists believe that keeping these allies would lead to the US being involved in unnecessary battles in other continents. They think that this will distract the US from just defending themselves, which should be their main goal. People who support selective engagement believe that keeping these allies is “the best way to prevent the eruption of a conflict in the first place.” These alliances affect the US and China because if the US were to keep these alliances China could invade these states. However, if the US were to keep their alliances with China, these attacks would be unlikely to occur. These are the main debates on whether the US should keep these allies.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, these leaders “also clearly recognize the danger of a China-U.S. confrontation” (Lieberthal and Jisi, 11). It is seemingly impossible to refute the fact that the benefits from the U.S.-China relationship far outweigh the costs that would result from a military conflict, therefore, it is difficult to fathom either side initiating a conflict within the near future as neither would directly gain from it. In my opinion, this paranoia over the Chinese-U.S. relationship is continually fostered by both simple ignorance as well as ideological differences between the two countries – both of which can be effectively resolved by more cohesive and comprehensive political…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the existence of private information commonly render the country to exaggerate their capacity and simultaneously underestimate the opposite country’s power. Consequently, they turn to be blindly positive for the upcoming warfare. These misconception usually render a country pursue a uncompromising policy(Robert Jervis 1976). Apart from the case mentioned in this book, I, as a Chinese student, can’t help thinking the Vietnam war in which the determination to war was misjudged by the United States. The army of the United States was marching forward to the North Korea disregard of China’s warnings, supposing that China will never take action against them.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Federalists strategy was to strengthen the economic ties with Britain. They wanted to settle the pre-war claims and debts with them before anything got out of hand. The Democratic-Republicans did not agree with this treaty because they believed nothing was accomplished and they did not want to become allies with Britain after they just broke free from them. The point of view of this treaty was that the Federalists wanted to…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim Crow Laws In America

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages

    seeing as to how it was working for them until this point in time. Lodge’s close friend Theodore Roosevelt simply stated that noting that he distrusted “a man who cares for other nations as much as his own”. Again it was Woodrow Wilson who wanted the treaty to remain however there was numerous attempts in order to reconstruct the treaty but he did not want to reopen the negotiations with germany and the allies. He also opposed any idea in which would weaken Article Ten of the League of Nations.Senators only tried so hard to change the Treaty simply to limit the U.S involvement in the league due to their “reservationist” views. It was possible for him to accept and side with the senators however he saw it fit to move…

    • 1024 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays