Nullification Crisis Dbq

Improved Essays
Show More
Once the War of 1812 was declared over, many taxes on imported goods, or tariffs, were passed on the Americans. These tariffs were enacted to protect the American manufacturing businesses from the inexpensive manufactured British goods (Khan, “The Nullification Crisis”). Specifically, the Tariff of 1828, or most commonly known as the Tariff of Abominations, was passed in the years that followed the War of 1812 to protect the American businesses. This tariff defended products in the North from the imports competition overseas (History, Art, and Archives, “The Tariff of Abominations: The Effects”). However, the tariff did little to support the businesses in the South.
As a result of the tariff, it would increase the taxes on raw materials in …show more content…
South Carolina protested this tariff strongly than any other state through the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions made by Madison and Jefferson that supported the state’s rights (Aboukhadijeh, “Nullification Crisis”). These resolutions stated that the state had the right to declare unconstitutional laws as null and void. Moreover, Calhoun wrote The South Carolina Exposition and Protest that included the Theory of Nullification, which was “the declaration of a federal law as null and void within state borders” (Khan Academy, “The Nullification Crisis”). Calhoun believed that states could nullify laws that were unconstitutional, such as the Tariff of 1828. He argued that the U.S. Constitution only passed tariffs to boost the revenue and not protect them from overseas competition (Khan Academy, “The Nullification Crisis”). The tariff did not aid their protection from foreign rivalries, and it only helped those in the North. Thus, Calhoun wanted the Tariff of 1828 to be …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson wrote the Kentucky Resolution while James Madison wrote the Virginia Resolution, and they both claimed the rights of the states (Bill of Rights Institute, “Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions”). This means that the government could not stop the states from their own individual rights. Specifically, in the Kentucky Resolution, Jefferson claimed that the states could nullify federal laws that they saw as unconstitutional (Bill of Rights Institute, “Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions”). To oppose the Tariff of 1828, Calhoun expressed this same idea, and he argued to nullify the tariff. This idea was expressed in both the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, and it served as a way for Calhoun to strengthen his argument about nullifying the tariff.
In conclusion, the War of 1812 generated many tariffs, but the one that had the most effect towards America was the Tariff of 1828. In the South, this was seen as the Tariff of Abominations due to its negative effects in their states. Many southerners, specifically Vice-President Calhoun, protested and wanted to nullify the tariff because he deemed it as unconstitutional. His ideas were expressed before in the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions that Madison and Jefferson wrote in the previous

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Tariff Dbq
    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Tariff Dbq

    Tariffs often prompted numerous debates over the issue of whether businesses or business workers would be safeguarded when economic policies developed. Several Republican congressmen championed for a higher tariff because they trusted that securing businesses would guarantee a salubrious economy in which laborers could find jobs. Contrastingly, Democratic congressmen advocated for a significantly lower tariff because they put forth that if citizens were unable to afford American products, the economy would subsequently collapse. Resultantly, tariffs gave way to the issue concerning government regulation of big businesses. “To keep the revenues flowing in, the Billion-Dollar Congress also passed the McKinley Tariff Act of 1890, boosting rates…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Gullification Crisis
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Gullification Crisis

    Jackson immediately offered his thought that “nullification was tantamount to treason and quickly dispatched ships to Charleston harbor and began strengthening federal fortifications there .” With such brute force, he turned around and then shot back at South Carolina harder than they questioned the government’s enforcement of the Tariff. To top it off, Congress supported his decision to dispatch soldiers to enforce the tariff measures by passing the Force Bill. The government was all hands on board to resolve this nullification crisis by silencing South Carolina. Secretly, under the table, Calhoun and Clay “had been working against the tariff drafting treatises railing against it and its effects on the South .”…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Embargo Dbq
    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Embargo Dbq

    The Embargo Act was a wrong decision of Thomas Jefferson, who was the third president of the Unites States in 1807. It caused serious collapse of the US economy at that time. This embargo made the people out of work, due to unemployment that led to increase social crime. Moreover, agricultural products could not be exported abroad, so it destroyed the family property and private enterprise. This embargo was not only beneficial for the United States, but also pulled the United States economy increasingly downward.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Dbq Essay
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nullification Dbq Essay

    However, many of these other states agreed that nullification was unconstitutional and threatening to the union and did not join South Carolina in their opposition to the tariffs as well as the government. According to the American Bar Association Review, “Calhoun loved the Union during the whole of his long lifetime. His doctrine of nullification was meant for its preservation and to serve as a check upon his associates in South Carolina who wished to go the whole length of secession.” Calhoun was not a man who wanted to secede South Carolina from the nation and create a new state. He wanted to keep the union intact while improving its democracy by protesting against unconstitutional government actions.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tariff Dbq
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tariff Dbq

    The vice-president, John C. Calhoun, reacted to this tariff by openly saying that states have the right to null a federal law, and challenged taxing imports without a clear objective. The answer to Calhoun came in 1833 when a compromise Tariff was produced that lessoned the Tariff of 1832 over a time span of ten years. South Carolina was the only state to nullify previous tariffs agreed to the new tariff resentfully. Though South Carolina’s small act of rebellion caused an uproar, most (including Henry Clay) thought it unrealistic for a South Carolina to null any law profitably or have thoughts about seceding from the Union.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Tariff Dbq
    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Tariff Dbq

    Hayne threatened secession and was ready to start a civil war if the tariff was not lifted; thus restoring the liberties of South Carolina. Andrew Jackson’s job as the president of the Union was to uphold the laws stated in the Constitution and he believed he was doing so accordingly by placing a tariff on South Carolina’s…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    The main reason that Calhoun believed the United States needed a system of roads and canals, besides his Democratic-Republican bias, was that he believed that the large size of the United States was going the cause disunion (Doc. B). As evidenced by the map in Document E, the United States was growing west very quickly. This growth contributed to sectional conflict over slavery. People thought that slavery would gradually die off because exhaustion of soil in slave states would make it impossible. However, this did not happen because of advancements, such as the cotton gin, and progression west.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nullification Crisis Dbq Analysis
    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nullification Crisis Dbq Analysis

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Tariff Of Abominations Research Paper
    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tariff Of Abominations Research Paper

    Much of the tariff revenue collected from Southern consumers was used to build railroads and canals in the North (Marotta & Russell, 2013). Between 1830 and 1850, 30,000 miles of track was laid. At its best, these tracks benefited the North. (Marotta and Russell). Those in Western states and manufacturers in the Mid-Atlantic States argued that strengthening the industrial capacity of the nation was in the interest of the entire country (Tariff of 1828).…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes
    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    South Carolina was the only state to threaten secession over tariffs. President Jackson’s threat to use force in upholding the supremacy of national laws eliminated any further threats of secession (Stamp pg 156). Economic differences did not escalate into war due disputes over tariffs. Tensions rose due to Southern fears that slavery might be abolished. A New Orleans paper claimed the Southern Minority would have to accept some forms of economic oppression at the hands of the federal government like tariffs and the national bank.…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    What Caused The Nullification Crisis
    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    What Caused The Nullification Crisis

    The nullification crisis was mainly in South Carolina, during Andrew Jackson’s presidency. It was a result of the souths fear that the federal government would ban slavery. So to avoid putting slavery in the national spotlight, South Carolina decided to attack “The Protective Tariff”, which was a tariff that increased the price southern agriculturists had to pay for manufactured goods. In short, what the South Carolina Legislature declared was that they had the right to “Nullify” any federal duties or laws that they felt were unconstitutional.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay
    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Secession Essay

    He never claimed that he would completely annihilate slavery. Conversely, the South only perceived rumors about how he would annul slavery, and Lincoln not campaigning for the South during the election did not suffice as well. So, when he was elected in 1860, South Carolina emanated its “Declaration of the Causes of Secession” and became the first state to secede for Calhoun’s Nullification Theory. The theory involves each state ratifying the Constitution and each state voluntarily relinquish in vamoosing consent to leave. Over and above, the Constitution does not unequivocally orated whether or not a state can or cannot secede, and the North and the South did not concur with the theory, fearing that seceding from the Union would result in revolution.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Republican Party And The Populist Party
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Republican Party And The Populist Party

    This Tariff was enacted to right the wrongs done by the Tariff Act of 1828. The Tariff Act of 1828 supported the economy of the North and not of the South. What the Act or 1832 attempted to do was make it so that the South was not feeling underrepresented. This was all in an attempt to keep the Union together a little bit longer until the government could satisfy both the North and the South at the same time without going to…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On The War Of 1812
    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay On The War Of 1812

    The War of 1812 was considered a “second war for independence” from Britain – the first one being the Revolutionary War. Britain had, once again, strained foreign relations with the United States by ordering the impressment of American sailors and seizing cargo ships; even though George Washington had declared neutrality. However, due to a lack in communication, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were unaware that Britain had began to respect their maritime neutrality and it subsequently resulted in the two men ordering the declaration for the War of 1812. As a result of the declaration, the country was torn in half – one half; the Westerners and Southerners, were pro-war while the other half; the New Englanders, were firmly against the war.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Four Causes Of The Civil War
    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Four Causes Of The Civil War

    However, when the Tariff of 1828 was passed, it raised tariffs on goods in south by as much as 50%, thus gaining the nickname Tariff of abominations. Since it raised taxes on imported goods, it benefited the North by discouraging the South from buying goods that weren’t manufactured in the North. The south felt that this was unfair, with…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings