According to David Herbert Donald in his article, “Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the Territories,” “containment” according to the North meant that in order to ensure slavery did not overtake free states, it must be held only to the locality where it currently operated. The North believe wholly in the “expand or die” philosophy regarding slavery, in conclusion, if slavery were allowed to creep into the new territories of America, it would also reach it's influence to the free states(Donald). For example the Northern free-soilers presumed, “If the extension of slavery could be prevented, they concluded the whole system must collapse”(Donald). Therefore if slavery could be held to the established areas in the South,…
One of the reasons why the South has decided to secede is because they think that just because slavery is protected by the constitution that it shouldn't be touched!Even though slavery is truly wrong. They say that the North is disobeying the constitution…
The events leading to the outbreak of the Civil War quickly snowballed and became much more severe than the previous ones. Leading up to the attack on Fort Sumter, the North and the South already had contrasting views on several issues not only on slavery, but also what the center of the economy should be based on and the limits of power the government ought to have. The Election of 1860 proved to be a breaking point for the South after Abraham Lincoln was elected. First and foremost, Lincoln was not even on any Southern ballots. In addition, the newly elected president was a Republican and having him lead the country would nearly destroy the Southern economy and ideals.…
Before the civil war, the states was separate with their own rule of living. The north was full of free state and the south was full of slave states. In this country, slaves was necessary for making money. Yet, they treat them as they was not human even in the free states. The north made a thing called the union with will bring everyone together but, the south didn't want to be apart of it.…
The South had detached itself from the way the rest of the country had decided to start living their lives, and proceeded to try and exit the union. Southern commissioners went around to other pro-slavery states to convince them to also succeed the union. “Despite their enormous value, the commissioners’ speeches and letters have been almost completely overlooked by historians and, as a consequence, by the public at large” (Drews 293). The commissioners did not feel the need to censor their speeches or letters out of fear of being politically correct because they were speaking to other Southerners. These letters have been so overlooked that the blatant racism in them, has not solely justified the cause of the civil war for some historians.…
The South Carolina Nullification Crisis of 1832 The Nullification Crisis was a major political crisis in 1832 during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. The concept of nullification was first discussed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, when they created the Doctrine of Nullification in order to oppose the Alien and Sedition acts. Despite the fact that Andrew Jackson was elected for his bravery and leadership in New Orleans during the War of 1812 and because he was in favor of the common man, he still was subject to a scandalous crisis that would cause controversy against the United States Government and would have a major impact on the country. This crisis was between the Federal Government and South Carolina and was known as the “Nullification…
The states of the North had become anti-slavery and the states of the South became slavery supporters. This is a relation to sectionalism in the 1800s because as time went by, the North and the South began to encounter issues, such as losing supporters with the same views of slavery. As the issues became more violent, the separation of the two Cardinal…
Slavery and the Making of America This book is written by James Oliver Horton. James Oliver Horton was born on March 28, 1942, in Newark, New Jersey. Son of The Oliver and Marjorie Horton and married to Lois E. Horton, mother and father of James Michael.…
Federal Versus State Many different aspects of governments go through power struggles, but sometimes it is which government itself is more powerful. The struggle between Federal Government and the state has existed since colonization. Both often feel that one should have more power than the other, but also are unsure which one does in fact have more power.…
This issue was found so dire that it was taken to the U.S supreme court, and it was found that it “invalidated the antislavery decision of the Wisconsin court in Ableman v. Booth. Despite the decision of the Supreme Court, South Carolina, a proslavery state, seceded from the Union less than 18 months later, an act that led to the start of the American Civil War in April 1861” (Gale). Secession from a country means to withdraw formally from membership in a federal union, an alliance, or a political organization and that is what the south begins to do. The states cannot accept what the federal government is doing by excising their ability to perform taxation, the south feels wronged by all the tariffs that have been created because it lessens the amount of business they receive because the north is becoming more independent without the southern cotton and crops.…
The Election of 1860 caused tensions to arise throughout the United States, particularly between the Northern states and the Southern states. While four men ran for presidential office, the two who gained the most electoral votes were Abraham Lincoln (most popular in North), and John C. Breckenridge (most popular in the South). These men represented the regions they were most favored by in their political beliefs. Breckenridge was a Southern Democrat, whose campaign identified closely with the beliefs of a common southerner; such as slavery, King cotton reliance, and strong state’s rights. In contrast, Lincoln was part of the new Republican party which strongly identified with the liberal beliefs of the North; including condemnation of slavery,…
In Apostles of Disunion, Charles Dew discusses how he originally thought that states’ rights were the predominant reason that the Civil War occurred. This point of view stemmed from his readings as a boy and his ancestor’s experiences with the war. The central idea behind the authors writing of the book is his analysis of the letters and speeches that the secession commissioners wrote, in which he sought the reasons other than states’ rights to their secession from the Union. Correspondingly, he argues for the centrality of race and slavery as the reasons for the South’s secession. What’s more, is the reasoning behind why the author is writing this book and his projected achievements from doing so.…
Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…
In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…
Many people ask if secession is justified, but it is our duty to acknowledge that secession is not justified it is in fact, a way to betray one's country. In the beginning, secession was thought to be the answer for the divided nation, but it ended up turning ugly. Many were in a feud over whether or not slave states should be allowed to succeed. At first, Southern states wanted to secede from the U.S. in order to gain independence so they could keep slavery, which everyone knows was and is evil, which means that secession is unjust. With states like Florida, Alabama, and Georgie leaving the U.S, they wanted slavery, it's no wonder why that sparked the Civil War.…