Essay On Jury Trial

Improved Essays
To answer the debate on whether to not use a jury in criminal case I turned to the internet to research the topic closer. Instinctually, I think that it would be a good idea to move to a judge trial. In my research, I have definitely made up my mind that this is the best way to go to solve a number of issues that currently are occurring in our judicial system. In the internet article on www.businessinsider.com (America should get rid of the jury trial) was very informative to me in reaching my decision. South Africa banned jury trials in 1969. The main reason behind this is the lack of willing people to serve as well as the odds of racial profiling. In America I do not think it is so much a racial profiling issue as it is that the judicial system is so complicated that the majority of people that would be called to jury duty simply do not have the intelligence or legal knowledge to decipher a large portion of the information and the idiosyncrasies of the law. Law professor Peter Van Koppen explained why this is such an issue stating that jurors often have to decide “technical issues beyond their aptitude.” I was unaware that the jury trial began in King Henry II time to settle land disputes. When the American Colonies where formed the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution …show more content…
The most famous case of this is O.J.Simpson murder trial in which opening statements were on January 24, 1995 to a verdict on October 3, 1995. One must believe with the massive amounts of evidence that the prosecution introduced in this trial would have resulted in a guilty verdict if it was heard by a judge only trial. I cannot help but think about all of the subsequent legal issues and proven guilty verdicts that have occurred and the pain and suffering at his hands other women have endured because of that mistake the jury made on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judge then handed the floor to the plaintiff attorney Richard Whitley introduced himself and his client which was named Michelle Moore. The defendant name was Joshua Muniz. He stated that the case was a motor vehicle accident and had already been trialed at a criminal court, which Defendant Muniz had plead guilty and was on probation and has severed community service for committing the crime. Moore was now suing for Punitive damages and mental anguish for damages that were occurred during the accident.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This made colonists highly upset, which would be one of the leading causes of the American Revolution. When the original members of the constitutional convention wrote the Bill of Rights, they understood how important it was to have a fair court system, so they made sure that the right to have a trial by jury was an official law of the United States. The 7th Amendment states: 'In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States,…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In such instances, those persons should not. Therefore, without peremptory challenges, the specter of unfairness could linger over the verdicts and further eroding community confidence in the justice…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Avery And Dassey's Trial

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    and he was seething with anger having to even provide this vindication to essentially clear two officer’s names. The eighth principle is the right of the defendant to be brought before a court. This was proven throughout the documentary; Avery and Dassey’s rights to a public trial by jury were upheld. This is corresponded with our seventh amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is the right of the accused to a trial by jury, these are due process rights.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Duty Case Study

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jury Duty Court Cases The Constitution of the United States guarantees to all the right to “Trial by Jury” when certain legal interests or liberties are at stake. The following essay contains jury duty and criminal cases. Part 1: A.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mostly a defendant would go for a jury, because they can hopefully “win” the jury over, there by swaying how they feel. However in a bench trial there is no jury, but it also can move faster because of that. Also bench trials can hear cases, where it would not make sense to form a jury, like ticket/speeding cases. 4. How many people are required for a jury in a criminal case?…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The power of juries has proven to play a large factor in wrongful convictions, although the jury selection process is meant to select people who won’t nullify or wrongfully convict it still…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jurors are often unqualified to determine a person guilty or not guilty and may be uneducated enough to determine so. Juries are, “letting incompetent amateurs decide the fates of accused persons is an injustice.” (text 3 line _). Letting jurors decide the future of the suspect without a complete understanding of law or understanding the outcomes of what they decide for the suspect is unjust.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Resolved: In the United States criminal justice system, jury nullification ought to be used in the face of perceived injustice. I am now tasked with providing definitions to clarify the debate. The United States Criminal Justice System is “The system of law enforcement that is directly involved in apprehending, prosecuting, defending, sentencing, and punishing those who are suspected or convicted of criminal offenses.”…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yes, jurors should be aware of their right to determine what they think should happen, no matter what the law states. In the video, judges decide if the jurors get to know their right as a jury member. They will not do it because they do not want the jury members to overrule the judge’s opinion. On the other hand, people would take advantage of this. People who are rich could easily pay off some of the jury members to walk away from a situation clean.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to figures founded by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, between 1993 and 2011, defendants heard in the Supreme Court were acquitted of all charges in 55.4% of judge-alone trials compared with 29% of jury trials. Professor Mark Findlay of criminal justice at Sydney University accredits these exonerations to judges being less likely to be guided by emotion whilst jury members could approach the case subjectively thus hindering the presumption of innocence. Furthermore, juries are becoming increasingly more influenced by social media reports and coverage, risking the procedure of a fair trial and including the possibility of the trial being aborted. The issue of “trial by social media”, recently gaining national attention following the high-profile murder case of Jill Meagher (2012), compromises the accused presumption of innocence and transfers the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defendant. The courts have deemed maintaining the balance of publicity and…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English Jury System Essay

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eventually the Jury were released after an application for an appeal was accepted. Prior to this decision, judges would attempt to manipulate and force the jury into favouring their opinion as to whether the dependant was guilty or not guilty and that the outcome should be the same as theirs. At the present moment is important that a jury gives their own verdict and this ideology is supported by the House of Lord’s decision, in the case of R v Wang (2005) in which the House of Lord’s confirmed that a judge cannot tell the Jury…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics