Sound Reasoning In Health And Social Care

Decent Essays
Though knowledge of ethical theory is not mandatory in dealing with moral dilemmas in healthcare, theories on moral reasoning can assist in making a decision as to what course of action to take (Seedhouse, 2009). In this segment of the assignment, I will relate the use of sound reasoning in applying the ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology to one such ethical dilemma. The case is that of John who just underwent cancer surgery and is now waiting for the results of a further biopsy. Pam, his wife, proposes that the results of the biopsy be deliberately withheld from John if the result is positive for metastases.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Davis. The EEN in this case study is evidently presented with a dilemma, which could be resolved by using ethical decision-making models. If I encountered this type of situation as an EEN, I would follow an ethical decision-making model called DECIDE, as discussed by Allen, Chapman, Francis and O’Connor (2008), as a guide to devise my response. The process is as follows: • D – Define the problem(s) The concerns surrounding this scenario include the request of the RN for the EEN to lie about the circumstances surrounding Mrs. Davis’ death.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the case of physician-assisted suicide, there are no apparent social consequences for the actions of the patient. In Dr. Quill’s account, Diane’s decision to end her suffering did not contribute to any negative social consequences. As Arras demonstrates in the case above, there are crucial flaws with adopting an entirely rights-based society. Nevertheless, a rights-based approach provides a unique perspective in favor of physician-assisted death. The Utilitarian…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors are expected to give care to all their patients without judging their actions or private life. Similar to Antigone, I have been presented with a moral dilemma in which the options include saving the life of my best friend’s thirteen-year-old son, or saving the life of a woman that developed cirrhosis of the liver due to her abuse of alcohol and drugs. I have chosen to not alter the information that would place my friend’s son at the top of the transplant list, due to the responsibility and the oath I took, to care for every one of my patients. It would be dishonoring to only think of my friend and how the situation affects me personally, and not consider the woman’s family and how the sickness of their loved one affects them. Due to my selfishness, I would be punished by losing the ability to save more lives, and do what I…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Your Cell Research Ethics

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A patient goes to a local hospital to be treated for a tumor found in his body. The doctor is already getting paid thousands of dollars to extract the mass, and during the procedure, he realizes that the cells from the patient are abnormal. He knows he can potentially make millions of dollars from the cells that extracted. The ethical thing to do before profiting from these cells, is to inform the patient of the cells’ capability. The patient should know that they can help countless people, and that the cells are worth millions of dollars.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charlie Gard Moral Theory

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first being Utilitarianism, which essentially is aimed at providing the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. In this case the greatest number of people is the many experts who came to the unanimous decision that the treatment was futile, and that withdrawal was in Charlie’s best interests. In the judge’s final decision, he agreed with the many experts rather than the child’s parents, who were the minority. Therefore, his decision was made on the foundations of utilitarianism as it provided the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people involved with the case. In addition, the moral theory of deontology is shown within Francis J’s final decision as he sided with the many medical experts that agreed that the treatment would not be in Charlie’s best interests or improve his quality of life.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effective clinical reasoning skills are essential in nursing; an estimated half of all clinical adverse events are attributed to errors in clinical decision-making (Levett-Jones et al., 2013). Tanner (2006) defined clinical reasoning as the process via which nurses arrive at clinical decisions by weighing evidence, pattern recognition, using intuition, selecting from alternatives and patient safety. This clinical reasoning cycle (CRC) consists of 8 cyclical steps namely, consideration of the patient’s situation; collecting of cues and information; processing of information; identification of problems and issues; establishing objectives; taking action; evaluation of outcomes; and reflecting on processes and new learning (Levett-Jones, et al.,…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Nursing

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is with no much doubt that the health care industry, above any other shows a high degree of concern for issues encompassing the wellness of their clients (patients). Ethical quandaries in health care are often times enthralling and exacting because it puts the health care worker in a position to come up with decision(s) that attempts to balance two or maybe more diverse opinions, both of which have their own ethical excellence. Every day, doctors, nurses and other health professionals are forced to make ethical decisions that abide by the code of ethics set by ethical committees in the health sector. The purpose of the codes is to guide healthcare givers towards identifying, understanding, and resolving tough ethical decisions that involves patients and their families. However, each ethical quandary demands a tradeoff of…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinical reasoning is embedded in the way of nurses’ thinking for patient care (Levett-Jones 2013). It is a spiral continuous mental process underpinned by critical thinking and a sound body of nursing knowledge to make clinical judgement (Levett-Jones 2013). Eight elements: consider patient’s situation, collect cues, process information, identify problems, establish goals, take action, evaluate outcomes and reflect on process are involved in the clinical reasoning cycle (Levett-Jones 2013). Nursing practice for registered nurses is guided both by National Competency Standard (Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia 2006) and Nursing Practice Decision Flowchart (Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia 2010) to challenge the medical assumptions…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. K struggles with a moral dilemma, should he or shouldn’t he tell Nora about her mother’s affair. The argument will be presented that if Dr. K were not to tell Nora, it would have more disadvantages than advantages. However, I will by arguing that Dr. K should tell Nora about Mrs. M’s affair with Mr. X for it will be most beneficial to Nora because it grants her the most rights, specifically the most autonomy, with the assumption that both Dr. K and Nora are rational individuals. My initial argument is that Dr. K should tell Nora about Mrs. M’s affair because it is morally impermissible to deceive a patient.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinical reasoning is a process and term used regularly by health care professionals that includes nursing. It consists of expert skills that are learnt through knowledge, cognitive thinking and experience. Clinical reasoning is essential to nursing care as it shows the thinking process of the nurse and that the nurse can competently and safely deliver care to diverse patients (Harmon & Thompson, 2014). In conjunction with clinical reasoning, the terminology critical thinking, clinical judgement and clinical decision making are used collaboratively. There are many resources about clinical reasoning and studies used on nursing students, graduate nurses and postgraduate nurses.…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As kids, we were thought to always tell the truth, a situation that seemed to be black and white. As we grow older, the reality of things becomes more complex. We are challenged in situations where telling the truth is not as easy and we have to consider how the recipient will interpret the information. We learn to outweigh the positive and negative outcomes if we tell the truth. Recipients, such as the patients, have many rights.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freda's Case

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nurses play a central role in advocating for their patients. In the case of Freda, the moral conflict between the nurse and physician revolves around the implementation of a feeding tube, in which the nurses feel does not respect Freda’s wishes. In utilitarianism, the beneficence principle means the value of the good (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440). In Freda’s case she defines good as dying peacefully. In Kantianism, the principle of autonomy states that the competent individual has the right to be self-determining (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440).…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This principle acknowledges that the patient has a perspective of her interest based on her values and beliefs and has the right to choose or refuse treatment. In this case, it is important to take Jenny’s wish and opinions on the issue of abortion because she has the rights whether to continue or refuse taking the risk. APA’s Ethic code 1.02: Conflicts between Ethics and Law, Regulations or Other Governing Legal Authority. This code requires psychologist to clarify if the actions are against legal law and ensure ethical standards to client without sacrificing client’s autonomy, rights and dignity (American Psychological Association, 2010).…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays