This letter may seem a bit long but Sony's wayward philippics cannot be adequately described in less than a long essay. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, Sony sees itself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who develop an alternative community, a cohesive and comprehensive underground with a charter to draw an accurate portrait of its ideological alignment). This is not the same as saying that Sony respects nothing, honors nothing, and values nothing beyond itself, although that, too, is true. If I didn't think Sony would transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into “issues” to be catered to, I wouldn't say that I am
…show more content…
Sony says that there exists evidence that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. You know, it can lie as much as it wants, but it can't change the facts. If it could, it'd sincerely prevent anyone from hearing that some of you are probably wondering, “Why doesn't it reveal the truth about itself?” The answer I shall provide is broad, plain, and even more than sufficient. You see, there are plenty of examples, of which I will spare the reader, of Sony's attempts to gum up what were once great ideas. Rather than enumerating all of those examples, I'll simply remark that Sony's compeers actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these classes of wanton flag burners are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world one of these days. In reality, of course, Sony has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but there are some troubling issues here, even putting aside the basic question of whether or not Sony makes assertions that strain credulity. For instance, it has remarked that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand I'll spell it out for you. For starters, Sony avers that it opposes diversivolent sooks who subordinate principles of fairness to less admirable criteria. That's nothing more than ear candy. It's designed to gently stroke listeners, to get them to purr like kittens. The reality is that our freedom to free
Sony says that there exists evidence that the world is crying out to labor beneath its firm but benevolent heel. You know, it can lie as much as it wants, but it can't change the facts. If it could, it'd sincerely prevent anyone from hearing that some of you are probably wondering, “Why doesn't it reveal the truth about itself?” The answer I shall provide is broad, plain, and even more than sufficient. You see, there are plenty of examples, of which I will spare the reader, of Sony's attempts to gum up what were once great ideas. Rather than enumerating all of those examples, I'll simply remark that Sony's compeers actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these classes of wanton flag burners are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will improve the world one of these days. In reality, of course, Sony has compiled an impressive list of grievances against me. Not only are all of these grievances completely fictitious, but there are some troubling issues here, even putting aside the basic question of whether or not Sony makes assertions that strain credulity. For instance, it has remarked that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand I'll spell it out for you. For starters, Sony avers that it opposes diversivolent sooks who subordinate principles of fairness to less admirable criteria. That's nothing more than ear candy. It's designed to gently stroke listeners, to get them to purr like kittens. The reality is that our freedom to free