r Mr. Alleyne,
Recently I have read your latest article on the sonic teenager deterrent (mosquito) and I am furious on your opinions towards the youth. The negativity in this article is overbearing. Although the mosquito may move these, “gangsters” away but the way you portray your thoughts imply teenagers are all behaving badly which is unacceptable as there is more INNOCENT teenagers in the world who still get affected by the, “mosquito alarm.”
This article is highly biased towards the youth of the world. By only taking the side of the older civilian’s people who are affected by the “loitering.” This shows no argument from a teenager’s point of view which is ageist but also you are not allowing teenagers to have their own say. Imagine …show more content…
There has been cases that the mosquito has affected people who is not in the age range. For example a recent case has come out that a young child was walking to the shop with her parent, again innocent people, and then the young child after coming home from the shops had a severe ear ache. Furthermore there was another recent case that a family with two children lived next to a shop and every time the mosquito system was activated their children would grasp their ears in pain. This suggests that the mosquito is affecting people who are not even the target. Mothers won’t be able to go anywhere with their children because of the torturing device. This means that is the government have agreed to put this system in place they are suggesting that they don’t care about children’s health. This horrific system put in place may move the adolescents but is it reasonable for other public people. This article only focusses on the mosquito alarm where there are plenty more devices that can be put in place and can cause no harm physically, for example the music of old people. This system if very affective and it moves teenagers away by filling their ears with classical songs which they are not a fan …show more content…
The vocabulary used is highly inappropriate. As a result of this you can see the stereotypical views and that you stereotype all teens into one group. The way you say –“the revenge is almost too sweet” suggests that you have negative view on all adolescents. It implies that you want to punish all teenagers for their age. The quote above is also full of negativity as the word “revenge” has connections of payback and is adolescents hanging around a shop corner such a immense problem that you all need “revenge” because personally I think you are over exaggerating; have you asked why they are hanging round shop door or hanging around McDonalds? What is they have no other place to go because of the same problem or maybe there is not enough facilities around the area they live in. at the beginning on this article the title says “plagued by teenagers”. This is suggesting that you are referring the youth of the world to a disease so terrible it is hard to get rid of them which is very
Recently I have read your latest article on the sonic teenager deterrent (mosquito) and I am furious on your opinions towards the youth. The negativity in this article is overbearing. Although the mosquito may move these, “gangsters” away but the way you portray your thoughts imply teenagers are all behaving badly which is unacceptable as there is more INNOCENT teenagers in the world who still get affected by the, “mosquito alarm.”
This article is highly biased towards the youth of the world. By only taking the side of the older civilian’s people who are affected by the “loitering.” This shows no argument from a teenager’s point of view which is ageist but also you are not allowing teenagers to have their own say. Imagine …show more content…
There has been cases that the mosquito has affected people who is not in the age range. For example a recent case has come out that a young child was walking to the shop with her parent, again innocent people, and then the young child after coming home from the shops had a severe ear ache. Furthermore there was another recent case that a family with two children lived next to a shop and every time the mosquito system was activated their children would grasp their ears in pain. This suggests that the mosquito is affecting people who are not even the target. Mothers won’t be able to go anywhere with their children because of the torturing device. This means that is the government have agreed to put this system in place they are suggesting that they don’t care about children’s health. This horrific system put in place may move the adolescents but is it reasonable for other public people. This article only focusses on the mosquito alarm where there are plenty more devices that can be put in place and can cause no harm physically, for example the music of old people. This system if very affective and it moves teenagers away by filling their ears with classical songs which they are not a fan …show more content…
The vocabulary used is highly inappropriate. As a result of this you can see the stereotypical views and that you stereotype all teens into one group. The way you say –“the revenge is almost too sweet” suggests that you have negative view on all adolescents. It implies that you want to punish all teenagers for their age. The quote above is also full of negativity as the word “revenge” has connections of payback and is adolescents hanging around a shop corner such a immense problem that you all need “revenge” because personally I think you are over exaggerating; have you asked why they are hanging round shop door or hanging around McDonalds? What is they have no other place to go because of the same problem or maybe there is not enough facilities around the area they live in. at the beginning on this article the title says “plagued by teenagers”. This is suggesting that you are referring the youth of the world to a disease so terrible it is hard to get rid of them which is very