Definition Of Justice In Socrates And Euthyphro's Piety

Superior Essays
Ancient Greeks lives center on their gods, and their daily lives consist of trying to live as piously as possible. Piety is the core moral laws during this time. To live piously is to live in harmony with the gods. It is extremely important that they must please the gods, that to act any other ways, acting impiously, is illegal and will result in punishment. Socrates is one philosopher that lives during this time. Socrates would go about the city, questioning people about their beliefs and understanding of any subject. He believed that helping his fellow men understand that they do not truly know anything will be beneficial to them. As Apollo told Socrates, he is the wisest because he knows that he does not know. When Meletus accused …show more content…
After Meletus and his supporters summon Socrates on charges of impiety, Socrates immediately obeys, for he believe that he had done nothing wrong, and he can convince the jury of their wrongs. He head to King Archon, where he meet Euthyphro, a self-proclaim expert on piety, who was also there on matters relating to such topics. The two intellects discuss the nature of piety, upon which Socrates ask Euthyphro for his definition on piety. Euthyphro first answer piety in terms of justice and legal matters. In his first definition, piety is acting justly in punishing those who do wrong, regardless of who they are (Euthyphro, 5D-E). Seen in this definition are the legal laws tie in with piety. Euthyphro represents the common Ancient Athenians who believe in the legal status of piety and use piety to serve justice. Socrates questions the definition and on his second definition, Euthyphro answers, “pious is what all the gods love, and its opposite, what all gods hate, is the impious” (Euthyphro, 6E-7A). Socrates, as a philosopher, goes around asking and questioning people on their beliefs and their knowledge. This is something that some gods do not approve of for it means Socrates is acting outside his human realm. By Euthyphro’s definition, Socrates is impious because he is doing something some gods do not approve off. Only actions that all gods approve off are considered to be pious. However, if an action is already deem to not be pious, then it does not matter if all gods hate it, the people will see it was impious regardless. In Socrates case, they see Socrates as impious simply because he is not pious, which does not necessarily imply

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Given the Supreme Court’s assertion that the associations and activities of the Humanitarian Law Project were a threat to national security, I believe that Plato’s Socrates would have found the decision of the Court to be unjust. Like HLP, Socrates’s behavior was perceived as a threat to the nation, in that he was impious and corrupting the youth with his beliefs. However, Socrates found that “piety” was subjective, saying that his relentless search to confirm the words of the Oracle made him “In ten-thousandfold poverty because of [my] devotion to the god.” In this quote, Socrates alludes to the ambiguity that exists in the legal system, specifically in defining the nature of piety. Given the similarly ambiguous terminology of the HLP case, I believe that Socrates would not find it lawful to punish HLP.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthyphro Research Paper

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Euthyphro says that holiness is prosecuting religious offenders. This does not satisfy Socrates because there can be many offenses. Socrates is looking for a more direct answer that applies to most things. Euthyphro then gives him his second answer. He says that holiness is something that is dead to the Gods and unholy is something that is not dear to them.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro, rather arrogantly, asserts that the people know not what impiety truly is, for if they did they would not consider his actions to be of the sort. This assertion indirectly indicates to Socrates that Euthyphro has knowledge of piety and impiety, and Socrates draws and analogy between his own case and the case of Euthyphro. If Euthyphro can explain to Socrates the meaning of impiety, perhaps Socrates can…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of the dialog from the beginning to the end Socrates was trying to teach Euthyphro. So may ask why, it because Euthyphro was the laugh of the town in Athens. He proclaimed he knew something even though was was wrong. He never admitted he was wrong. This in turn made everyone not take Euthyphro seriously.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, something must put piety into the state of being pious and Socrates looks at the gods to do so. Socrates describes that which is holy is dear to the gods and thus if it is dear to the gods it is also holy or pious. Socrates then asserts the claim in a different order where that which is dear to the gods is loved and is thus holy or pious. Therefore, if that which is dear to the gods is due to the state of it being loved by the gods then therefore, if something is loved by the gods then it thus must be holy or pious. This justifies Socrates’ argument that piety is dependent of the gods because the gods put piety in a state of being pious.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro makes the comment, regarding his families’ ill-temperaments towards him, “Which shows, Socrates, how little they know what the gods think about piety and impiety.” (Jowett, 1868, p. 3) In justification, Euthyphro claims he his act is just according to a higher, or divine, law, which is ironically, due opposite the position Anytus, Lycon and Meletus hold against Socrates. Enter now the unmatched wisdom and adroitness of Socrates, as detailed by Plato, whereby he [Socrates] challenges and pursues Euthyphro through logic and rhetorical…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is why he asks Euthyphro to define piety, so that he himself will have a measure for deciding what is religious and what is not, thus be able to defend himself in court. Euthyphro answers that what he is doing in prosecuting his father is religious, and he cites the precedent of Zeus punishing his own father (Cronos). Socrates then questions many of the stories about strife among the gods over the next few passages as Euthyphro continues to defend the gods. This questioning of the stories about the gods is what leads to his trial in the first place, that he questioned them and that because he was a teacher it caused the youth to question the gods. If you question the gods and the gods are pious, you are in turn acting with impiety.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Euthyphro’s definition of piety is the action/way that all the gods love. This means that the gods actions are not arbitrary or relative, rather they are deeply rooted in principles which are shared. The similarity I want to draw on is in Mill’s approach to higher pleasures where he believes that competent judges’ preferences are not as relative as they are principled, hence encompassing a deeper and higher value associated with higher pleasures that outweigh the pleasure amount argument. However, it’s important to realize that this justification takes the ideology further away from hedonism as it has now involved other higher senses and principles, which defeats the purpose of hedonism. Still, it does explain the dignity and value we as mortals attach to higher pleasures that are achieved by higher capacity exercises.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, I believe he can be innocent. Socrates may have different beliefs than the people in Athens, but he still believes in higher powers. He believes there is a god capable of power but the Athenians suppose otherwise. Socrates was being intentional when it came to being honest and trustworthy. He wanted to guard his ground and defend anything that does not speak of his name.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?”…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Euthyphro, the common question that Socrates sets out to answer is “what is piety”, which is the advocate to understanding the charges placed upon him by Meletus. Plato introduces the topic that it is far worse for one to do wrong than to suffer wrongdoing, and Socrates isn’t fazed by Meletus. Despite Socrates' impending…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Polemarchus debate the assertion “it is just to give to each what is owed to him,” that Simonides originally theorized. The postulation develops from Cephalus’ prior claim that a just man is one who “speaks the truth and repays his debts” (331d). Socrates undermines Cephalus’ definition of justice by proposing a scenario wherein a madman lends a sword to a friend, and the friend may either return the weapon or keep it from the obviously dangerous individual. Socrates concludes that returning the weapon, which would be the “just” action according to Cephalus because it constitutes honest repayment, is unjust. In his debate with Polemarchus, Socrates once again critiques the proposed relationship between…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who follow his teachings make their own decisions, and unfortunately, some of those followers acted against what the government sees as right. Socrates does not intend to create harm, it was not his fault and he cannot control the actions of others. But it doesn’t help that his teachings were associated with those who were corrupt. According to Michael Zuckert, “Socrates himself would not voluntarily corrupt others, because to do so is to make them harmful to their associates, and surely Socrates would not act to bring harm to himself. Socrates, like all men, seeks the good.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays