The First Dialogue In The Trial And Death Of Socrates

Improved Essays
Socrates was arguably one of the most influential Greek philosophers within ancient history. From his great intellect came the reputation of being the father of western philosophy. Socrates spread his knowledge to many students, the most famous being Plato. Plato is the author of The Trial and Death of Socrates in which four dialogues describe Socrates’s final chapter in life. Through these dialogues it is often questioned whether Socrates was responsible for his own death at the hand of two accusations: not believing in the gods and corrupting the youth. Through careful analysis of Socrates’s language and actions one can determine whether or not Socrates was guilty of causing his own death as well. Therefore, the following essay argues that …show more content…
Within this dialogue Socrates is having an intellectual conversation with Euthyphro before he faces his accusers. Euthyphro is a religious man that is knowledgeable about holy and just things so Socrates begins to question him about one of his accusations: impiety. Socrates states, “I want you to tell me what part of justice is piety or holiness; that I may be able to tell Meletus not to do me injustice, or indict me for impiety” (Plato, 13). From this is may be assumed that he wanted to actively learn so that he can be prepared to defend himself; however, when Socrates and Euthyphro begin discussing this, Socrates continuously questions Euthyphro. He does this to such an extent that Euthyphro eventually gives up his explanation. After this Socrates then states, “I was hoping that you would instruct me in the nature of piety and impiety, so that I might have cleared myself of Meletus and his indictment” (Plato, 17). This can be seen as evidence towards the fact that Socrates is responsible for his own death because if he truly wished to win his case against his accuser he would have listened to Euthyphro. His words can even be taken as sarcastic and even …show more content…
Socrates comes for one of his main accusers Meletus about his accusation. Within this debate about what Socrates is guilty of, Socrates ends up making Meletus contradict himself (Plato, 25). While his victory can be seen as attempting to save his own life, Socrates follows this conversation with extreme cockiness stating that he is arguing for the sake of Athens and not himself (Plato, 31). By doing this he is making himself stand out and claiming to be smarter than Athenians, putting him back into an unfavorable light with the court. The court votes and Socrates is surprised that it is in his favor. It is then that he makes the suggestion that he should be rewarded by being housed in the Prytaneum since he has never “intentionally done anything wrong” (Plato, 36). It is obvious here that he wants to be responsible for his own death. Suggesting he get amazing treatment when he is on trial is guaranteeing he will be voted against. Socrates is not ignorant, he knows fully that by suggesting this he will be voted to be put to death and he eventually is by re vote (Plato, 40). After he is sentenced to death, he contemplates death and states “...there is great reason that death is good” (Plato, 40). Socrates believes that death is one of two options: a state of nothingness or migration of the soul from this world to another. Like a true philosopher, the final statement he gives in court is “The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate how Socrates replied to the main charge he was…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this statement, along with the remarks in his exchange with Meletus, the accuser of Socrates, he outrightly invalidates this argument made by the prosecution. The prosecution had several weak allegations towards Socrates, making the arguments on the side of the defense that much…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s Euthyphro A1. Socrates explains to Meletus that he is under indictment. Socrates is being charged with two accusations: “corrupting the young” and “not believing in the gods.” A2.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates, the classical Greek philosopher and one of the founders of western philosophy, was accused by the people of being an atheist and corrupting the youth with his ideas. He was, then put into trial in which the jury decided that he was guilty, and finally he was sentenced to death. While being in the prison, waiting for the execution process, Crito, one of Socrates’ friends, came to visit him offering a plan by which Socrates can escape from prison before the day of his execution. However, Socrates refused to escape the death sentence. A large argument took place between Socrates and Crito concerning whether Socrates shall escape or not.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time of Socrates arrest he was 70 years old. He was arrested on the charges of believing in false gods and for corrupting the minds of the youth. These charges have philosophical reflections within them. This trial holds great importance for philosophy. The Trial of Socrates can also been seen as the Trial of philosophy.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Apology, Socrates explains his reasoning for why he was put on trial and how the jury should proceed. He tried to persuade the jury not to put him to death, but instead have him pay a fine (which he could not afford), exile him, or give him no consequence. Also, Socrates was very…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Echecrates, knowing that Phaedo was present in the moments leading to Socrates’ execution, pleads with him to recount his final conversation with Socrates. Phaedo notes that a number of Socrates’ friends were present in his cell including Crito and two Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cerbes. The group’s discussion begins with Socrates presenting a central theme of the text: that philosopher should look forward to death. Although he argues that suicide lacks a moral justification, Socrates maintains that the life of a philosopher is a preparation for death. He first claims that death is a release of the soul from the body.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors are obviously agreeing with one another and gathering false information about Socrates. Socrates then defends each accusation and misinterpretations by pointing out what the jurors said. Socrates' wisdom intentionally comes off as rational. He stayed true to who he was when the jury decided a sentence to death. I believe he carried himself well and staying strong to maintain his…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Apology of Socrates there is not real evidence of true impiety for the Athenian government, but Socrates does put forth feelings of arrogance and self-confidence within himself and his beliefs. Throughout Socrates’ trial he hardly questions anyone which would be seen in a traditional trial, he often goes on tangents and laments about the injustices of the world in large words that perhaps many of the people there did not understand which leads to him being seen as impious and rejecting traditional Athenian values. In the beginning of his trial Socrates talks about how he had never been to court in his more than seventy years of life, and that because he wasn’t accustomed to their language he would talk in the language he had learned,…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Socrates was young, he should choose Kant’s model to confront hardships without fear of self-value destruction temporary in order to prove himself right and the decision made by juries that were wrong. However, the fact that he was old, if he still chooses to challenge the system, perhaps before his death still could not be able to complete the mission. Therefore, if he takes into account of his situation, accepts the judgment was the only possible choice to fulfill what he had taught to his followers, even though he would be executed. However, this was the best ending for him to preserve his dignity of identity, as well as meaning of his…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates’ philosophical attitude may have resulted in his death, but he has no change of heart when he learns his…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays