Socrates Trial Case Study

Improved Essays
Carl: Sam, would you say that Socrates' trial was not fair because he was not guilty of the sentenced crimes?
Sam: Well it was an extreme denunciation for such petty accusations.
Carl: Since we agree that Socrates was wronged, I think Socrates was stoically accepting unjust Laws. He didn’t try to convince the jury of his innocence. Do you think Socrates did right by staying and facing death, or should he have escaped?
Sam: I think that Socrates believed that he was doing the right thing by obeying the Laws. Socrates might be able to reply that he was not being wronged at all--that it was just fate and circumstance that led to his execution. If Socrates could have successfully persuaded the Laws that he was wrongfully imprisoned, he should’ve
…show more content…
If Socrates escaped and the Laws were broken, that means that it is because of the Laws that he was imprisoned. If Socrates was imprisoned wrongly, and if this was in accordance with the Laws, then it would seem that the Laws were unfair and should have been broken. So if the law failed to fulfill its duties by threatening to kill an innocent person, does this not mean that the law has broken the social contract between citizens and law?
Sam: Nonetheless, trial by jury is a part of the Laws; the Laws are unbending, and if Socrates is found guilty by jury then he is guilty according to the Laws. Socrates obviously knew this because he agreed to the social contract at adulthood. Socrates chose to stay in Athens and willingly obey to the Laws of Athens. It would also be contradictory for him to escape because he declined exile when it was presented to him at will, and then leave Athens when the Laws did not allow him to do so.
Carl: But it was Meletus, and the public that accused Socrates so if the people are wronging Socrates unjustly, that means that they are wronging him in a way that is not in accordance with the Laws. Thus, Socrates should not be breaking the Laws in trying to break free from

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Over the course of time, reading the Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito have given us some background on the matter. This paper examines why Athens chose to wait so long to put Socrates on trial. There were many factors, such as, personal, political, cultural, and global, that influenced his trial in 399 BCE. Socrates was well known…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The law was used unjustly. This was what Socrates tried to prove in his trial. The accusation went as follows: "Socrates is an evil-doer who corrupts the youth, and who does not believe in the gods whom the city believes in, but in other new divinities"( Plato 9). During the trial, he denied all the accusations, but he was still announced death. Consequently, since the laws are unjustly applied, his decision not to escape from prison cannot be regarded as rational , and it is always right to follow unjust…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I do not think that Socrates would be morally justified if he escaped the jail cell based off civil obedience. I think the biggest thing that plays a role here would be based off Socrates need to live a just life. Socrates states many times that he has spent his whole life making sure that he did right thing, and now it would be good to change based off a different situation. If he left even being held for the wrong reasons he would then be faced with the fear of being caught for leaving, which would be a violation of the ethics due to living a life of running from the law. I think his strong belief in ethics would be broken if he left the jail cell in a in just way, or without the proper release and not having to live a life in fear of trouble.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Escaping from jail will cause him to get into more trouble than taking the blame for the crime he did not commit. For example, he may be sentenced to a torturous death, rather than a possible quick death. If he stays, he will surely be punished, but escaping will make him much more wanted. If he is caught, he will be given, as stated before, a much more torturous death if he cannot prove he did not commit the original crime. Although, if Socrates does escape, he will not be able to live the life he once had.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When held on trial, Socrates stated that the people of Athens would be more harmed by his execution than he will be, if he were to be sentenced to death. Socrates was fighting charges for corrupting the youth and for not acknowledging the Gods. During the trial Socrates had proven that his accuser Meletus was accusing Socrates mainly out of spite instead of accusing him for the benefit of Athens or the people of Athens. He believed that an unjust killing was not good for the human soul. During the trial Socrates called himself a gadfly, attaching himself to the city of Athens and helping the people of the city understand the truth behind any theories that he would discuss or that would be brought up.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With his reasoning and arguments, Socrates decides to not obey the Laws of the state and proceeds with his verdict. Socrates knows that he did not truly commit a crime or disobey with the laws, but he did not want to commit an unjust action as well. Although one may not agree with the ideas and beliefs of a state, that…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also accepts his fate stating that, “it is not difficult, O Athenians! to escape death… it is much more difficult to avoid depravity.” All of his life Socrates taught philosophy and forward thinking, and if he had gone back and begged for a fine or for jail he would’ve thrown away everything he had taught to his students and everything his life had supposedly stood for which is to be moral just and virtuous. Socrates goes on to say that the judges should punish his sons and pain them as he had pained them if they were to exhibit signs of depravity by holding things like money before virtue.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps Socrates realized the courts were right in his sentence because he was not truly wise and had in fact corrupted the minds of the youth. Or, maybe he knew that if he was to be acquitted of the charges he would continue his teachings and probably end up back in jail, and would rather not waste the time and effort. Or, maybe Socrates’ love of Athens and the respect he had for the government and the courts decision stopped him from fleeing his death…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates did not corrupt the youth. This answer is not, however, one-dimensional. Because this question is at the center of discussion within a trial setting, there is a legal dimension to this question that must be addressed. But looking at this question solely though the lens of legality does not provide us a robust answer – we must also address the question with the broader idea of corruption in mind. At no point in this five-word question does it tell us to only interpret the question in legal terms.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates defended him self by drawing attention to the fact that he has taught the anyone for many years that would listen with out fee. He even asked the court to excuse his simple mannerisms showing the fact he has never been I trouble with the law, and it was his first time ever being charged with a crime. He talks about how he has never sought public office (power) he talks about how it is society job to influence (work interest of the youth) the youth. He uses an analogy to describe how he is a horse trainer and the youth are horses and how other (society) benefit for his teachings like how to do serein tasks that benefit Athens. Socrates is sentenced to death and given multiple opportunities to escape to another county.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays