A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Socrates

Improved Essays
fighting for in court. Not only does he refute Meletus’ claims, but he accuses him of evil doing, saying that he brings men to court over problems he has no interest in. Socrates confirms this point when he cross examines Meletus and finds inconsistencies; the points Meletus stresses about Socrates not believing in Gods and being a corrupter of youth are disproved when Socrates explains that he does technically believe in a God and that youth do not have one sole corrupter. This part of the speech once again emphasizes the point of those who are unwise speaking about that which they do not know. Meletus does not feel personally affected by Socrates “crimes” but takes him to court based on second person accounts and his own personal biases. …show more content…
On multiple occasions, Socrates states that he does not fear death, as he does not know if it is good or bad and to assume would be pretending to know the unknown (a pretence of wisdom), and that no matter the consequences, he will continue to practice philosophy. Socrates believed that his questioning and debating were his vocation and that he was sent by God to influence the minds of Athens. In his speech, Socrates attempts to relate to the jury by using figures they understand such as the heroes of Troy and the son of Thetis, people who have lay down their life for what they believed to be a worthy cause. In Socrates mind, it would be disgraceful to abandon his ways of life simply because he was faced with death, which to him was not a scary thing. Once again, this connects Socrates defence with the greater issue that is philosophy. Practicing philosophy is by no means an easy task as many people do not wish to look deeper into their lives and are too proud to admit their knowledge is faulty. As was stated in a previous paragraph, man often gets angry or even violent, when his beliefs are brought into question. Despite the obvious physical danger and the general disdain of society, philosophers like Socrates continue to practice because they believe in the betterment of ones soul and the overall

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates applies a rhetoric called elenchus that counters the popular Sophist rhetoric of the time. Elenchus introduces a method of debate based on utilizing questions and answers that inspire analytical thinking and tests the credibility of the opponent’s prior dialogue. In short, Socrates continuously “investigate[s] the question” (Line 348a). Socrates himself never explicitly states his opinion, but simply restates the declarations of the three interlocutors: Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymarchus. Socrates largely bases his arguments on his ability to accurately recall statements from earlier in the conversation.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was reading an article, which explain how Aristotle uses his rhetoric when it comes to persuasive. Rhetoric is "the ability, in each particular case, to see the available means of persuasion." He described three main forms of rhetoric: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. I think that everyone uses Pathos, Ethos and Logos most of the time in your common life as a rhetorical appeals. When you're trying to persuasive your audience you use all your resources that you have when you argument about a topic that you know for fact.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is important subject that impacts our history and has been wonderful tool towards many eras throughout time. Philosophy allows people to find out their true self, comprehend their living on Earth, and recognize the bonds we have with other people. Many philosophers took on these tasks and put their valuable information towards their society resulting them to documented in libraries or other resources that are preserved for future scholars. Philosophers found it challenging to get their points across their societies where they encounter conflict with political and religious groups because their statements may discriminate authority and laws. One famous philosopher who has been in this scenario that is classical Greek philosopher, Socrates where he…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates makes a statement that if the jury kills him it will not be easy to find another like him. However once he is sentenced to death he states there will be more accusers after he is gone. Is he not contradicting himself? Was he trying to spare his life even though he claimed to not fear death? Another statement that leaves me with questions is, in the beginning of Socrates speech he says that his friend asked an oracle if there is anyone wiser than Socrates.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After Socrates gives the court some historical background as to why these rumors exist, he focuses his attention on Meletus and the first charge. Socrates begins by stating that, since Meletus claims to know who is corrupting the youth, he must know who improves them. After some back and forth between the two men, Socrates gets Meletus to say that all Athenians improve the youth and that Socrates is the only one who corrupts the youth. Socrates continues to use Meletus own…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today is one of the most important days in my life, for I was chosen to be a member of the jury deciding Socrates’ fate. Meletus and other two people accuse Socrates is an evil-doer (Plato, Apology,p.234). They bring up 2 main accusations to Socrates First, Meletus accuses Socrates has corrupted the youth; Second, Meletus accuses Socrates does not believe in god, he is an atheist. Here is how Socrates defends himself.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was an incredibly talented Greek philosopher from the city-state of Athens. He was regarded as the wisest man in all of Greece for his time. It is even said that he was told at a very young age by a great oracle that he would be the wisest man. However, his profound and unorthodox teachings wound up landing him in trouble with the Athenian government. Socrates was tried for corrupting the minds of the youth.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates makes the stunting--(stunning?) remark that “a good man cannot be harm in life or death,” and that killing him will do more harm. He understood that the first step to achieving wisdom is realizing one’s ignorance’s and if Socrates is he were gone, then no one will would show the people of Athens the path to truth. Socrates also understood that death is not to be fear feared, simply because…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fact that nobody knows what lies ahead after death, a person cannot involve rationale in the argument of fearing death without coming out as arrogant. When Socrates lost the trial he remains rebellious in the sentencing period to result in his death sentence and he had to deal with the analogy of mortality (Plato et al 2003). He did not view death as an evil thing. As such, the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he lived his life peacefully unaware of any absolute truths, and death is no exception. To find such tranquility in the unknown, long before his end, was Socrates’ greatest accomplishment, and it was because of his philosophical attitude. Socrates did find his peace of mind. This allowed him to live intelligently, constantly criticizing the close-minded beliefs of others, and morally, with all respect for other beings and the Gods. Time and time again, the philosophical attitude is used as a tool for philosophers to see beyond their restricted perceptions of reality.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believes that for the accusation that meletus has made you don’t take a matter for trial but you advice that person that what he is doing is wrong you don’t just go to courts because when the matter has reached court that means you want punishment. This matter is not subjected to punishment it can be resolved peacefully without anyone facing facing punishment or jail. If Socrates was corrupting the youth, the youth and their parents should have noticed and reported the matter. If this case was reported by the parents of thr youth that was taught by Socrates it would be strong bt then because it was reported by meletus it is weak.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before taking Socrates to trial Meletus had the option of pulling Socrates aside to correct him and to exhort him privately to change his behavior. After all, Socrates declared that it would be irrational and dangerous for him to corrupt the youth willingly since it would have negative consequences for the city and his family (25b-26a). Socrates clarified that he's believes were not meant to corrupt and by this he confronted Meletus with the following dilemma: "Either I do not corrupt the young or, if I do, it is unwillingly” (26a). In fact, Socrates points out to Meletus, that if he corrupts unwillingly, the law did not require him to bring people to court but to get hold of them privately, to instruct them and exhort them. However, Meletus decided Socrates fate by taking him to the court, where the law required one to bring those who are in need of punishment, not instruction.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In court, he says that his behavior to question everything is because of the Oracle of Delphi and he finally understood why it said that he was the wise man in the city if Athens. Socrates does not fear death, instead he believes that fearing death is the same as someone believing that they are wise whereas in reality they are not. Socrates says that he does not fear things which he doesn’t know has no knowledge about(pg.8) Socrates also believes that people will not do bad things if they had known better, “if I learn better, I shall cease to do what I am doing unwillingly (pg. 5)”. This quote is told by Socrates when Meletus accused him of corrupting the youth, saying that he did not know that it was bad for the youth to leave their families and follow him.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays