Plato Fair Or Unfair Essay

Improved Essays
Whenever there comes a time where you have to make a decision, whether fair or unfair to you, one must always decide what you consider it is the best option, as Socrates states: “Act with your consent and not against your will” . It is essential to act always justly and respecting the law, no matter what other people can do to you, because acting against fairness and law is immoral and corrupt. In the following essay, I will provide arguments and information about the reasons why Socrates, having been sentenced to the death by the authorities, refused to receive the help of his disciples and decided to stay in prison, even though he was put to death unjustly, based on Plato’s work piece: ‘Crito’, written around IVth century BC.

First of all,
…show more content…
He is breaking the laws and the civic society of the city, because he is despising what the sovereign of the city has dictated. As he mentions, if you make a legal and just agreement with any person, you must keep your word and never attempt to break it. It is like a promise you can’t break. Likewise, the same happens when you live inside a city, in this case, like Socrates in Athens. The city of Athens is the reason of Socrates existence; i.e., it enabled their parents to meet, marry and engender him. Besides, it has also been in charge of giving Socrates a proper education, through establishing laws in order to develop an efficient educative system as well as taking care of him; he is in debt with the city if Athens. Therefore, Socrates declares that it is completely unfair to break the laws from a city that has given him everything, and has always seek to give him the best. In addition, every citizen is free and has the right to decide whether to stay …show more content…
Nobody forces you to live under the laws of the city, even more, you are free to go wherever you think the laws suits you the most. However, if Socrates decided to stay was because he believed that by escaping, he was betraying his city, as well as his citizens and family. If he ran away, he was questioning the authority of the law and would be a bad example for society, because breaking the laws of the city also implied breaking the agreement and being disrespectful with it, and incited others to do the same and reject the laws, which would end in the destruction of the city. Regarding all this, Socrates concluded that he must accept what the law dictated to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We can empathise with our protagonist, and would likely respond in the same manner if put in the same situation. However, Socrates is not an ordinary man. By giving up on trying to convince his…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, not all authorities are delighted in God’s eyes. In addition, God’s laws are over all laws. It is wrong to obey the laws that break God’s laws. In Socrates’ case, the law had been incorrectly applied. He was mistreated.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He knows if he refuses to escape prison that he will have a good defense when he stands before the dead who will see him as a victim of injustice not from the law but injustice from those who abused the law. Crito and Socrates flow of the arguments goes Living Well Argument- to do an unjust action ruin one's soul, Life is not worth living with a ruined soul, and hence the most important thing is not life but living a moral and just life. Consequences for Athens Argument- if I escape from jail, then the laws of Athens and thus the city of Athens will be destroyed. To destroy the laws of Athens and the city of Athens harms the citizens of Athens.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates refuses Crito’s invitation to escape because by doing so he breaks the laws of Athens. Socrates explains to Crito that by exiling himself he not only breaks one law, he breaks them all; this is due to the fact that as a citizen you support the laws, and breaking one law would end your endorsement. These laws carry great importance to Socrates, because by escaping he breaks the law from which he was fostered, educated, and begat his children. By exiling himself, Socrates cannot enter other states; considering he broke the laws of Athens, other states would see him as a fugitive. Furthermore, Socrates he explains that he would not greedily risk his children’s Athenian citizenship in order to save his life; he also states that even the…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, Crito believes that its not wrong for Socrates to escape because he has been imprisoned unjustly. However, Socrates does not agree with Crito, keeping his view of the obligation of fulfilling the terms of the sentence. Socrates believes that when the states interest disagrees with that of a person, a person should not object to the state's imposition of power upon him, even though that which is being imposed may be unjust. Socrates bases his argument on the fact that he is a citizen of the state. Socrates was born, raised and educated within its boundaries and as a result has a dedicated responsibility towards…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito Argumentative Essay

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates saw escaping from prison as doing wrong. Another reason was, “you should never injure others, even in return for injury done to you.” Socrates believed escaping prison was violating the law. He backed up his agreement up by saying, “by violating the law, he would injure the law and citizens of Athens.” Socrates saw law as a vital component to mankind.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Vs Law Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although Socrates has questioned authority in the past, I claim that he does not desire to repudiate against the very government which raised him, unlike Antigone. Socrates justifies his point in a conversation with his friend Crito, opposing any plans…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s “Apology” examines the trial of a great philosopher named Socrates. He is brought to court because of corrupting the youth and not believing in Gods. In response against his accusers, Socrates maintains that being sentenced to death is a possibility. While others fear death, as it is an evil; he does not fear it as he views death positively. According to Socrates, death is an advantage.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates defended him self by drawing attention to the fact that he has taught the anyone for many years that would listen with out fee. He even asked the court to excuse his simple mannerisms showing the fact he has never been I trouble with the law, and it was his first time ever being charged with a crime. He talks about how he has never sought public office (power) he talks about how it is society job to influence (work interest of the youth) the youth. He uses an analogy to describe how he is a horse trainer and the youth are horses and how other (society) benefit for his teachings like how to do serein tasks that benefit Athens. Socrates is sentenced to death and given multiple opportunities to escape to another county.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society. He chose the punishment of being fed by the government…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays