Socrates Book 1 Summary

Improved Essays
Gargi Ketkar
Hogan
Social Foundations, Tuesdays
16 October 2015

Summation: Book I Introduction: The main questions explored in the first book of the Republic are questions of morality and justice. How do each of the characters Socrates interacts with define what makes something or someone moral? What is justice’s role in a functioning society?

Cephalus: Socrates begins talking to Cephalus saying that he believes that we have a lot to learn from the old because they can tell us about what may lie ahead for us in life since they have experienced so much. Socrates asks Cephalus if it’s difficult to be on this threshold of old age, if he misses things about his life, if there’s things he can no longer enjoy (like sex). Cephalus tells Socrates
…show more content…
Socrates asks him what he (Polemarchus) thinks morality is. Polemarchus defines morality/justice as “giving anyone back what you owe them.” Socrates argues against this point by once again bringing up the example of the once sane but now crazed friend. He finally gets Polemarchs to elaborate further on what he was saying before. Polemarchus then says that you must give people what is owed to them. According to Polemarchus we should do good deeds for our friends and we owe an enemy what an enemy deserves, something bad. Socrates goes on to challenge this again saying that it could also be the case that the people who we call our friends, could actually be bad people, and maybe the people who we claim to be our enemies could actually be good people. Following this logic, it could be possible that if we applied Polemarchus’s definiton of justice and morality we could be accidentally doing good things for people who are actually bad (we just don’t know it). Hearing Socrates out, Polemarchus then develops another definition. He concedes that maybe morality has to do with doing good things for a person who is fundamentally good and moral and to punish or harm a person who is fundamentally

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Thrasymachus’ Conception on Justice In Friedrich Nietzsche’s work, The Genealogy of Morality, he states that the existence of laws establishes what is just and unjust within a given society (Nietzsche 1280; sec 12). Thus, there does not seem to be anything explicitly virtuous for justice. In reference to the Republic, I will argue Socrates and Thrasymachus have different views on justice and will ultimately disagree with each other on Nietzsche 's conception of justice. Nietzsche’s entire work is trying to dissect morality from its origins.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 399 B.C., one of the most famous trials took place. The philosopher Socrates was accused of not recognizing the gods recognized by the state and corrupting the young and his contemporaries of Athens. Socrates pleads to the jurors that his trial should be ruled by the justice of the case, not by his manner or rhetorical skills he presents. In The Impiety of Socrates, M.F. Burnyeat provides a new way of understanding Plato’s Apology, and attempts to justify the juror’s decision as to the ultimate conviction of Socrates. Burnyeat’s reading strategy suggests that Socrates fails to defend himself against the charges by Maletus and others.…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his second stance, Glaucon continues the argument of the ‘unjust’ man by, mentioning the ‘unjust’ man is thought of as ‘just’, because the laws of the city apply to him, as well. Glaucon also states that the ‘unjust’ man can “offer sacrifices and gifts to the gods; basically using his wealth to repent for evil doings. He states, because the ‘unjust’ man is wealthy and can dedicate gifts to the gods; they unite to make ‘unjust’ better than ‘just’. However, to offset Glaucons’ argument, that man is naturally ‘unjust’ Socrates, debates the reason why. In his stance, Socrates begins by, stating no man is ‘just’ for the honour and rewards.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We should not accustom you to perjure yourselves… This is irreverent conduct for either of us” (35c). In judging based on this sympathy, the jurors are spoiling the word of the law, thus destroying the base which Athens is built upon. Here, Socrates works to educate the crowd on their wrongdoing, explaining the “irreverent conduct” that leads it to be immoral (35c). In doing so, Socrates is able to lead society towards a higher moral law in their awareness of their wrongdoing.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s “The Republic”, Socrates and his Interlocutors try and solve the riddle that is whether or not the just man is happier rather than the unjust man. In the following paper I will proceed to explain what Justice truly is. In book one of “The Republic” the question and main point of the entire first book is “What is Justice?” Cephalus claims that “Justice is giving what is owed”, but Socrates explains that it is not always a good idea to repay one's debts, for example if you borrowed a knife from your neighbor and he intends when you return it to kill someone, then in that instance even though that it is his property it is not just to return it to him.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    how little does the common herd know of the nature of right and truth. A man must be an extraordinary man and have made great strides in wisdom, before he could have seen his way to this” (p. 3). This quote from Socrates comes after he asks Euthyphro what he is doing on the porch of King Archon. Euthyphro responds by telling Socrates that he is there to bring up a charge of murder against his father. When Socrates points out that, according to accepted beliefs, it is wicked to harm or bring disgrace on one’s father, Euthyphro counters that that makes no difference.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In book one of Plato’s The Republic, the different accounts of justice have been brought up. The old man Cephalus has described two concepts of justice which is, justice is when you are telling the truth and practicing honestly and justice is also giving each other what he/she deserves. When old man Cephalus and Socrates had their discussion Socrates also had issues with his definition of justice as well. None of the definitions sit well with Socrates although he has not given his own definition. In the beginning of this book Socrates and Thrasymachus has debated about what is justice and it has appeared that Socrates has defeated the argument of justice being the interest of the stronger.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 - Synopsis of Reading "Socrates: A Life Examined", Pgs 61-91 In chapter 3 of Socrates: A Life Examined, author Luis E. Navia introduces us to a second Socratic testimony written by another one of Socrates’ contemporaries, Xenophon. Within this chapter we discuss some major bibliographical details of Xenophon and his involvement with Socrates. As well as his most important Socratic works, their significance with the Socratic problem, and their differences with writings of other contemporaries, such as Aristophanes. Most importantly, Xenophon’s Socratic contribution helps shed light on the reason why Socrates seemed to choose death over anything else.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Something very similar happens in the Charmides, where Socrates is introduced to a young man who is said to be an exceptional model of temperance. Socrates questions Charmides about the virtue he supposedly possesses, but discovers that Charmides is unable to explain exactly what temperance is. Beginning at 158e Socrates asserts to Charmides that if he were truly temperate then he should be able to tell others what temperance is. Charmides agrees and at 159b he actually gives a potential definition of temperance—which is doing things “orderly and quietly”; this is significant because it is so unlike the interlocutors in previous dialogues who always gave an example to start with and had to be prodded by Socrates to give a definition. Socrates…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice, but is also forced to come to its defense in response to an inquisitive Socrates. Through the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates, Plato forces the reader to question the traditional Greek perspective on justice and attempt to develop a new definition. Central to comprehending the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates lies in understanding Polemarchus' notion of justice.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Platos republic is a study in the question; 'What is justice and how is it achieved". Plato recounts a discussion between Socrates and other notable philosophers in which they attempt to answer this question and discover what exactly constitutes justice in an idividual. After the peers of Socrates present many hypotheses - which he finds all to be flawed- he attempts a solution to the question with the following comparison. Justice is achieved in man in the same way it is within the state; it is present when everyone minds their own business. He breaks the state and man into 3 components that each possess qualities called cardinal virtues; Wisdom, Courage, Self-Discipline.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crito attempts to argue and reason with Socrates. Crito argues that he would lose an irreplaceable friend, reflect badly on Socrates’ friends and refusing his friends’ help, aiding his enemies, abandoning his children, and taking the easy way out. Socrates questioned Crito if one should care about the opinion of the many, or to only listen to the good and wise men. Socrates believed that one should listen only to the wise men, which is the basis to his response to Crito’s arguments that refusing to escape from prison with his friends’ help would reflect badly on them. He also believes that he should obey the Law of Athens as it is just.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will analyze the debate in book 1 between Socrates, Cephalus and Polemarchus over the true definition of justice. In doing so, a summary of both Cephalus’s and Polemarchus’s arguments will be given as well as Socrates’s objections. Additionally, I will state why I believe Socrates’s objection was convincing. Finally, the question “what is Cephalus like as a character? What are his limitations?” will be answered through an examination of his old-fashioned, traditional Greek methodology.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first few paragraphs of this reading describe various definitions on what is or is not justice. Socrates starts off by giving a vague statement saying that justice is “doing one’s own,” as in a person performing their required role in their community. A statement that doesn’t clarify much. But even though there still isn’t an obvious manner to describe what justice it, it is much clearer what justice is not. A “thuggish” philosopher, Thrasymachus, comes up with the belief that it was in the public’s best interest not to act in accordance with justice since it only benefits the powerful and harms them.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays