Why Does Socrates Believe Himself To Be Innocent?

Improved Essays
Reading Response: The Apology
Analysis
“Why does Socrates believe himself to be innocent?” The Apology is a record of Socrates defense to his jurors who had charged him with impiety. When taken before the court, a major part of his defense, is that the Oracle at Delphi proclaims him to be the wisest man alive. Later the Oracle gives the reason that he is wise explaining “He, O men, is the wisest, who, like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing.”. While this statement is a interesting philosophical point, and one that will be discussed later, for now this paper will ask “How does that philosophical point pertain to his innocence?”
Socrates claims to be wise, and his basis for saying so is, paradoxically, that he did not
…show more content…
Why does he feel it necessary to introduce his argument by telling them that “Only God is wise”? Assuming that this is indeed the form of argumentation that he is making, there are at least three possible reasons that he chooses to introduce his argument in this way. First, presenting his argument as a paradox within a narrative is rhetorically superior to merely saying “I am either wise or a fool”. Second, he is concerned that his hearers have a proper understanding of the what wisdom is. Without that understanding, it would be difficult to understand his argument. Lastly, it gives Socrates an opportunity to clear his name. This premise is supported when he says, “I am going to explain to you why I have such an evil name.” Socrates makes use of all three of these when presenting his case. He used rhetoric to clear his name and explain what he believed true wisdom to look …show more content…
If humanity did not have scripture, everyone would be without certainty. People would be able to know some truths, like there is a God, and they are accountable to Him, but they would be missing the Gospel. Deuteronomy 29:29 says “The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law”. God has given us scripture and made us accountable to it. We must look to it for wisdom. God is the only ultimate source of wisdom. Questions
• Why does Socrates believe himself to be innocent?
• What is his argument in the trial?
• Does Socrates present a valid argument?
• Is Socrates making an argument for everyone for all of time, or for just himself?
• Why does Socrates base his argument on a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Over the course of time, reading the Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito have given us some background on the matter. This paper examines why Athens chose to wait so long to put Socrates on trial. There were many factors, such as, personal, political, cultural, and global, that influenced his trial in 399 BCE. Socrates was well known…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo Introduction Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues Meno In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came about because of the oracle of Delphi’s reasoning, which mentioned that Socrates was the wisest of all men; this puzzled Socrates and he wanted to prove the oracle wrong by finding a person who was wiser. It was because of these activities that caused many of the citizens to hate him because he uncovered their ignorance of knowing something and I believe that Socrates wanted them to understand that being ignorant of knowledge and virtue does not make one happy or wise. He expected that once the citizens knew that they knew nothing, they would be able understand that they are not wise. Therefore, even if the city wanted him to stop his activities, he wouldn’t be able to because he is considered the wisest and given the job of questioning his fellow citizens’ knowledge and in turn makes Socrates comment that this is also a benefit to the…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates in Apology In the Apology, Socrates presents an argument for his belief in the Greek gods to invalidate Meletus’ assertion that Socrates is an atheist, which therefore means his teachings corrupt the youth (26b). Socrates’ argument is valid through philosophical logic yet as we will find, his argument is not sound. There are also revisions to Meletus’ claims which will be presented as it will display a stronger argument in favor of Socrates’ atheism.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Apology, Socrates explains his reasoning for why he was put on trial and how the jury should proceed. He tried to persuade the jury not to put him to death, but instead have him pay a fine (which he could not afford), exile him, or give him no consequence. Also, Socrates was very…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates’s defense against the charges of impiety brought up by Meltus had different reasoning. In the Apology, Socrates stated that he doesn't have any type of knowledge of the sky or anything else. People have accused him of reading and studying the sky and the things below the earth. He also talks about the story of Oracle at Delphi as a reference. Later in this defense, Socrates makes the same reference again of Oracle at Delphi and he feels like it is his duty to question the people’s knowledge.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In todays society we find many experts is the fields that they have studied in. You can find an expert in mathematics, science and an expert harpist. In order to prove that they are an expert one must only perform these tasks in such a way to show that they possess expert skills or knowledge. In order for them to gain such knowledge they often will train, study and learn such tasks from teachers, scholars or such experts in the field. In Plato’s work, The Crito, Socrates explores such a question and asks if there is an expert of the human soul.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The article Platonic Studies of Greek Philosophy by Robert S. Brumbaugh refers to the issue behind Socrates conviction as ‘persistent inquiry’ when re-telling the story of Chaerephon speaking to the oracle (234). Socrates continues this ‘persistent inquiry’ when questioning Meletus about educating the youth, attempting to prove that Meletus had no real interest or concern for this matter (Plato 24e-26b). Question after question he fails to show any meaning to his inquiry leading to a potential argument were it can be perceived as an attempt to confuse the jury. Socrates also contradicts his stories when he claims that “those who had the highest reputation were nearly the most deficient, while those who were thought to be inferior were more knowledgeable” (Plato 22a). When referring to 23b of the Apology (Plato) we understand Socrates to be in poverty because of his occupation which with the knowledge of his trail of death, we can conclude Socrates to be an inferior person.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates begins his defense by remarking what persuasive speakers his accusers are in contrast to himself. He indicates that he does not expect to get a fair hearing because of the wide-spread rumors about him and that these rumors associate him with the natural philosophers. The problem with that association is that the natural philosophers were widely suspected of atheism because some of them openly advocated atheism. “Well, then, I will make my defence, and I will endeavor in the time which is allowed to do away with this evil opinion of me which you have held for such a long time; and I hope that I may succeed, if this be know that to accomplish this is not easy—I quite see the nature of the task. Let the event be as God wills: in obedience to the law I make my defence.”…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three main charges against him is his religious beliefs, corrupting the young and also his views of the Athenians. Even though there were several prosecutors and evidence to prove Socrates guilty, he guarded his ground and remained true to his philosophies. He proved many of his beliefs with evidence that will be discussed throughout this essay. However, it made the process much longer than expected for the people of Athens. Socrates religious views were seen as unusual to the city.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates is considered to be one of the greatest philosophers in not only the time of ancient Greece but one of the greatest in history. His philosophical views were seen as radical during his time and it eventually leads to the trial condemning him to his death. The Athenians were unjust in their conviction and condemnation of the death of Socrates. Socrates was accused of being impiety for not believing in the gods that the state believed in and corrupting the youth. His different views made him a criminal?…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted to know what justice was, but he never gave his definition, instead he asked others and counter attacked this became known as the Socratic method. The Socratic method is more of investigation, and discovery, until you find the right definition. Socrates interest was to find answers and gain knowledge. In the Socratic method you can mold your answer and change perspective you’re always open to new ideas. Also from The Apology we know Socrates didn’t “charged fees” to share his knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘The Apology’ written by Socrates most famous student Plato, is a Socrates dialogue where he is defending himself from the accusations of corrupting the youth and not believing in the gods of Athens. He tells the court that these accusations are false and he does believe in the gods of Athens. He also tells them that he did not corrupt the youth, in fact the youth followed him on their own free will. According to Socrates the problem was that people who called themselves wise were not actually very wise, their knowledge was based on ignorance thinking that they were wise and he wanted to help them see that true knowledge was knowing nothing rather than believing that they know everything. As philosophy is based on questioning everything,…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays