Ancient Grecian Legal System Analysis

Superior Essays
It is important to mention that though we use the Ancient Grecian legal system, in addition to juries, we also have judges deciding the fate of a defendant party. Ultimately, no matter which method we use: judge, jury or both, there may be some bias within the trial. Bias ' create complications for most Canadian courtrooms as Lady Justice is looked upon to allow everyone equal opportunity. Unfortunately, this does not always happen. Though wrongful convictions are a reality in our court system, I suspect that we would have a lot more if the legal system were just to rely upon a judge or jury — especially in severe legal cases. Throughout Socrates’ Apology, Socrates tells the larger jury that he has, indeed, been charged with a crime …show more content…
I believe this because he showed signs of premeditation of the murder, he decided if he should kill her by shooting her in the head or giving her an overdose of Valium; eventually settling that he should poison her with carbon monoxide. He also showed these signs of premeditation when he killed her while his wife and other children where out of the house, as if to protect them, though they would inevitably find out, or know that they would try to stop him. That stated, there are some signs that Tracy’s quality of life was not totally ruined, as she could have been placed on a feeding tube which could have improved her nourishment. For all of these reasons, it is why Latimer was rightfully convicted of second degree murder and even though he arguably does not pose a risk to the public — he killed his daughter. And though Tracy Latimer was severely disabled with cerebral palsy, which caused her an inability to walk we simply do not know whether or not if she wanted to die.

If Canada were to legalize mercy killings, I believe that a slippery slope of what actually constitutes as one and what doesn’t would occur as with whom should exactly be killed. If it were to be legalized, in most cases it would be left up to those around the individual to make the decision, not the individual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the last 250 years, U.S. citizens have been given a controversial option of a jury or bench trial. Not everyone agrees with the bench trials. Although jury trials sound like a good idea, it is actually true that bench trials are better because it guarantees the right verdict almost all the time. Jury trials choose ordinary citizens off the street. For example, with the society today, people cannot stay off their phone, which makes them vulnerable to hearing or gathering false details about the trial.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 399 B.C.E. Socrates, accused of corrupting the youth and “making the weaker argument defeat the stronger” (Plato), faced the furious Athenian jury. During his trial/apology Socrates explained his perspective, stating that he was no fool because he was aware that he knew nothing “I am wiser than this man; neither of us probably knows anything…, but he thinks he has knowledge, when he has not, while I, having no knowledge, do not think I have” (Plato). As written by Plato, Socrates’ “apology” is no real apology, as Socrates simply brings attention to his argument, while at the same time exposing the weaknesses of the accusations brought up against him. Submerged in his disgust of greed and corruption Socrates sets out to find the “wise ones” but in the process ends up exposing the highly respected yet selfish members of the society. In his interviews Socrates asked questions that made his subjects feel insecure and exposed, but even though his so called interviews made him unpopular Socrates believed it to be his responsibility to “expose the frailty in human nature” (Plato).…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This quote helps to illustrate the fact that although Socrates was found guilty, it was not because he gave a bad defense, but rather because of the sheer numbers of people who were against him from the beginning. It is also important to remember that Plato’s “Apology” was written as witnessed by Plato. Because of this we do not actually know what Socrates truly said, or whether Plato’s account of the Trial is completely accurate. However, it is generally believed that the “Apology” was written not long after the event, and many Athenians would remember the actual speech, thus it would be ineffective if Plato, whose goal was to prove Socrates innocence, tried vindicating his master by putting a different speech into his mouth. In addition, Aristophanes’ “Clouds” would have been more engaging and likely to impact the Athenians, and since it was written as well as performed before Socrates’ trial, it is likely the jury held biased opinions against Socrates and that nothing he said would have likely vindicated…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wentz, “ In the Apology Socrates is represented as condoning disobedience. First (29d) he states that he would “never stop practicing philosophy” even if so ordered by the jury at his trail. Second (32 c-d) Socrates proudly tells of his disobedience to the Thirty Commissioners when they ordered him to go to Salamis to get Leon. Thus, there is at least apparent inconsistency between the Apology and the Crito on the question of disobeying the law. ”(Wentz).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine, you have lived your life without cause, you are a law abiding citizen, you have never been in trouble, furthermore, your life is established, your married, you have kids, the perfect job, life is excellent. Then one day, by haps, you are stopped, detained, arrested, charged with a crime, not just a crime, a violent crime, a crime that is unspeakable, child molestation! Your life is upside down, your wife, your family, your friends, even your co-workers all look at you differently. However, your innocent, and you protest such, to everyone who is willing to listen to you, however, you cannot get over the fact that no one is listening to your cries, now your life is in the hands of strangers, a prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, and…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the other developments that a common language allowed was the development of a code of laws to help govern the empire. Laws helped to reaffirm power structures in the empire as well as protection of human rights, an idea that has lasted to present times. The ruler often used laws to express his will throughout the empire and these laws were distributed by the officials of the ruler were higher ranking than the citizens. Goodspeed discusses this structure in the Babylonians, “The constitution of a state ruled by a king with such prerogatives and position is naturally summed up in the ruler. The citizen, while he expects protection and justice, is a subject; the officials are the king’s dependents; his will is law; and the strength of…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ancient Egyptian legal system was based on common sense. The Egyptian goddess Maat was the goddess of justice, truth, balance, order, law and morality. Basically, the law followed the teachings of Maat, according to the priests, about what was right and wrong. No remains of written laws have been found.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's Apology Argument

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Plato’s Apology, Socrates is put on trial for accusations of disruptive behavior. Some men in the community feel that his way of life goes against the will of the Gods and corrupts the youth. As he stands before a jury that will ultimately decide his fate, Socrates states that “the difficulty… is not in avoiding death, but in avoiding the unrighteousness” (Plato 38). Socrates knows that death is inevitable, and repeatedly claims he does not fear it. He believes that it is harder to run from the injustices and evils of the world than it is from death, so he defends his philosophy even after execution becomes the verdict.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone had told him then he would have known better not have done it. Socrates also believes that without him the entire city will turn ignorant and will never know what true wisdom is and tells the court that he is helping the people of this city by keeping their minds active. When the jury decides that Socrates was indeed guilty they let him choose his punishment of being exiled or going to prison. Socrates said that he did not want to be exiled because Athens was his home and he did not want to leave his home, he wanted to stay there and help the society. He chose the punishment of being fed by the government…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics