Rousseau Vs Socrates Analysis

Improved Essays
To be virtuous means to have high moral standards; to be righteous and honorable. Principle is moral rule or belief that helps one distinguish what is right and wrong. To have power means to have the capability to direct or influence the behavior of others. Virtue and principle go hand in hand, virtue requiring a moral compass and principle providing that said compass, but is that what’s most important? Being morally responsible? Or is obtaining and having power more important— specifically when it comes to politics. Socrates and Rousseau definitely would argue in favor of morality versus power; Socrates is more interested in finding one’s true self which he believes is equated with virtue and Rousseau is concerned with preserving individual …show more content…
They jury does not sit to dispense justice as a favour, but to decide where justice lies; and the oath which they have sworn is not to show favour at their own discretion, but to return a just and lawful verdict” (Plato 63, Apology 35c).
Socrates definitely supported virtue and principle over power, in fact he was willing to die to prove his faith.
Compared to Socrates, Rousseau was more focused on finding an ideal society instead of truth, but he also agreed with Socrates’ defense on virtue and principles. Rousseau believed that people were motivated by self-preservation and pity, and compassion was the natural state of law which acted as a restraint for some to keep them from harming others;
“Before its birth, the desire of self-preservation, tempers the ardour with which he pursues his own welfare, by an innate repugnance at seeing a fellow-creature suffer. I think I need no dear contradiction in holding a man to be possessed of the only natural virtue, which could not be denied him by the most violent detractor of human virtue. I am speaking of compassion, which is a disposition suitable to creatures so weak and subject to so many evils as we certainly are” (Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Crito attempts to argue and reason with Socrates. Crito argues that he would lose an irreplaceable friend, reflect badly on Socrates’ friends and refusing his friends’ help, aiding his enemies, abandoning his children, and taking the easy way out. Socrates questioned Crito if one should care about the opinion of the many, or to only listen to the good and wise men. Socrates believed that one should listen only to the wise men, which is the basis to his response to Crito’s arguments that refusing to escape from prison with his friends’ help would reflect badly on them. He also believes that he should obey the Law of Athens as it is just.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cassondra Britton A Modern Day Socrates: Bob Ross Socrates was a classical Greek philosopher who is considered one of the founders of Western philosophy. A man who was too progressive for his time, Socrates’ radical ideas, such as the rejection of materialistic society, challenged those whose wealth shielded them from the masses. This progressive man defied common beliefs, and confronted those who held those beliefs. An unexpected teacher of many, Socrates was a visionary whose ideas challenged the status quo and social structure of society.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A central theme in Plato’s The Meno is virtue. It is approached through posing two questions: How does one acquire virtue? And what exactly is virtue? Meno poses the question “can virtue be taught?” (70a)…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s dialogue Gorgias, Socrates argues against Polus an ancient Greek orator, that tyrants and orators do not, in fact do what they want, instead they do what they see fit. As a result of this claim, Socrates believes tyrants and orators have the least power in their cities. This paper will primarily argue Socrates’s views through the definition of power, who holds the “real” power, that some things are inherently bad, and that there are different views of morality. The argument that Socrates sets forth states “If a person does whatever he sees most fit to do when he lacks intelligence, is this still ‘having power?’”…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 16th-18th century the Enlightenment many people questioned how they would be governed and how they would be treated. The Enlightenment was a movement that took place through England, France, Germany and other parts of Europe. This movement had an impact on the government and how people should be treated based on their sex. There were five philosophers that took part and the enlightenment movement: Charles de Montesquieu, John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Socrates Quote Analysis

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is one of my favorite quotes from Socrates and I believe that it’s really meaningful. I find this quote very interesting since, there are many ways to find a meaning for it or a way to feel identified with it. The meaning of with quote for me is, when humans do something that they have not done before and they enjoyed or really like it, and they know that they will repeat it again. Human are that way. When you find pleasure doing something you want to do it again, to feel the emotions you felt.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Cicero's Against Verres 1, Cicero attempts to convict Verres, the governor of Sicily, with extortion. Although Cicero speaks much about Verres's character, this speech also greatly relates to contemporary courts. This speech overall speaks to the level of corrupt that occurs in court systems, either ancient or contemporary. With no doubt, there is still aspects of corruption in modern-day courts, which will always be inevitable.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Rousseau, “most of our ills are of our own making” (84). Additionally, while the savage man is absorbed with gathering food and is not plagued by boredom or non-primal desires, freedom dissipates along with the development of inequality as “the excess of idleness among some and the excess of toil among others” (84) becomes present. When a savage man is sick, he has no expectation or desire to see another human such as a doctor. In fact, the sick savage man has “nothing to hope for except from nature, conversely he has nothing to fear except from his sickness” (85). In addition to this, Rousseau contrasts man in society, where people of all classes suffer “sorrows and anxieties”…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is important to mention that though we use the Ancient Grecian legal system, in addition to juries, we also have judges deciding the fate of a defendant party. Ultimately, no matter which method we use: judge, jury or both, there may be some bias within the trial. Bias ' create complications for most Canadian courtrooms as Lady Justice is looked upon to allow everyone equal opportunity. Unfortunately, this does not always happen. Though wrongful convictions are a reality in our court system, I suspect that we would have a lot more if the legal system were just to rely upon a judge or jury — especially in severe legal cases.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Fairness

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These instructions to the jury are not only virtuous because they illustrate the virtues of neutrality and impartiality by instructing the jury to only consider the evidence and to not be influenced when deliberating by any preconceived notions, influences, or prejudices. These instructions also envelop the common practice employed by judges of “dispassion” to prevent “emotion from exerting any influence" wherever such opportunities exist in order to maintain fairness and equality to all in the courtroom regardless of standing or background. This admonition and instruction by Judge Ito to the jury also alludes to the virtue of testimonial justice described by Miranda Fricker in Epistemic Injustice in that the jury and as well as the judge…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Politics and ethics are two vital components of a functioning society. When these two components are carefully balanced a sate/society can remain organized and fair to its citizens. In a realistic society the idea of what political ethics and human nature consist of varies, but in an idealistic society political ethics and human nature possess a common ground. Political ethics and human nature were a mutual understanding at some point but as societies grew, citizens began to think as individuals instead of as a collective. As a result of this self-serving behavior, inequality and the mistreatment of others quickly followed.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    History of The Peloponnesian War by Thucydides and the Iliad by Homer are both timeless accounts of war that also analyze human nature. Both authors divulge their belief about what comprises human nature through the observation of war and its effect on morality. Homer and Thucydides agree that emotion, specifically compassion, is the key to a human life. However, the authors differ on their definition of compassion. Thucydides sees compassion as a natural emotion felt among equals while Homer sees compassion as an emotion only achieved through suffering.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays