Socrates And Euthyphro's Definition Of Piety

Improved Essays
When Socrates finds out that Euthyphro is charging his own father with the negligent homicide of a slave, he asks Euthyphro what Piety is. Euthyphro believes that prosecuting his father is his responsibility as he believes that he must act with piety. He declares that no matter what the case, even if it is family who killed someone who was not a relative, this is his first reasoning for the prosecution.
Socrates responds to Euthyphro’s reasoning saying that this definition is too broad. Socrates was looking for an answer with more intention or a standard that everyone can follow in order to act pious. He says that Euthyphro is simply giving him examples that are an extension of piety, but not a definition of it.
In an attempt to please the
…show more content…
Socrates famously responds saying “is the holy loved by the gods because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved by the gods?” He is saying that this means that there could be two different definitions of good. One definition would be that what is considered holy already exists and that is out of the gods control, however this would take away the power of the gods because the “good” would a force higher than them. The other way to look at it is that the gods have the ability to say what is or is not pious even if we currently believe it to be evil or harmful even if is completely …show more content…
In the Bible, in Leviticus 18:22 it says “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” It can also be found that it is punishable by death. This same book also says that we should not Idolize anyone but God himself. “Those who pay regard to vain idols forsake their hope of steadfast love” found in Jonah 2:8 says just this. However, we are seen constantly idolizing celebrities, athletes and politicians above and even before god. Now the same people who believe that homosexuality is evil, because the Holy Bible says so, can be found doing idolizing many other mortals before and even above God himself. These people are picking and choosing without any further backing for their beliefs and even will refuse any argument against it. Their only reasoning is to, as famous singer Macklemore sings “paraphrase a book written thirty-five-hundred years

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Euthyphro resulted conclusions that were conflicting with other beliefs he has, therefore creating a logical dilemma for him.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Euthyphro goes to charge his father for killing his slave after a slave killed another. Euthyphro states that it is because it is pious to do so, however Socrates sees through that and tells him to repeat his reasoning. After Socrates agrees with the way Euthyphro explains the use of piety again, Socrates restates into more detail piety and impiety in the way that Euthyphro means it. This is the instance at which Socrates states “An action or a person that I beloved by the gods is pious, while an action or person that is despised by the gods is impious. They are not the same, but complete opposites” (7a. p.5).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and if Euthyphro believes his impious actions will insult the gods (4E). Euthyphro believes his advanced wisdom on the meaning piety translates to know what the gods mean by the word too. Socrates needs him to explain the word to demonstrate his mastery of it. Euthyphro attempts to deliver a definition of piety. However, Socrates wants the essence of the word in order to demonstrate true mastery.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I argue that Euthyphro’s defense of his view that his father is guilty of murder is not cogent. I will first present the argument that Euthyphro’s claim against his father is mainly rooted in circumstantial beliefs that can easily be disputed. Secondly, I will prove that Euthyphro is too unreliable of a source for the cogency of his sole account to be convincing. And lastly, I will argue that Euthyphro’s main reason for prosecuting his father does not have to do with his own moral compass, but rather with his own pride and hunger for recognition.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Given the Supreme Court’s assertion that the associations and activities of the Humanitarian Law Project were a threat to national security, I believe that Plato’s Socrates would have found the decision of the Court to be unjust. Like HLP, Socrates’s behavior was perceived as a threat to the nation, in that he was impious and corrupting the youth with his beliefs. However, Socrates found that “piety” was subjective, saying that his relentless search to confirm the words of the Oracle made him “In ten-thousandfold poverty because of [my] devotion to the god.” In this quote, Socrates alludes to the ambiguity that exists in the legal system, specifically in defining the nature of piety. Given the similarly ambiguous terminology of the HLP case, I believe that Socrates would not find it lawful to punish HLP.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the morally correct decision is that which a deity, or group of deities, concludes is correct. For the sake of these arguments, the Christian God, who is omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent, will represent the deity that Socrates speaks about. God's…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro makes the comment, regarding his families’ ill-temperaments towards him, “Which shows, Socrates, how little they know what the gods think about piety and impiety.” (Jowett, 1868, p. 3) In justification, Euthyphro claims he his act is just according to a higher, or divine, law, which is ironically, due opposite the position Anytus, Lycon and Meletus hold against Socrates. Enter now the unmatched wisdom and adroitness of Socrates, as detailed by Plato, whereby he [Socrates] challenges and pursues Euthyphro through logic and rhetorical…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is why he asks Euthyphro to define piety, so that he himself will have a measure for deciding what is religious and what is not, thus be able to defend himself in court. Euthyphro answers that what he is doing in prosecuting his father is religious, and he cites the precedent of Zeus punishing his own father (Cronos). Socrates then questions many of the stories about strife among the gods over the next few passages as Euthyphro continues to defend the gods. This questioning of the stories about the gods is what leads to his trial in the first place, that he questioned them and that because he was a teacher it caused the youth to question the gods. If you question the gods and the gods are pious, you are in turn acting with impiety.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Euthyphro’s definition of piety is the action/way that all the gods love. This means that the gods actions are not arbitrary or relative, rather they are deeply rooted in principles which are shared. The similarity I want to draw on is in Mill’s approach to higher pleasures where he believes that competent judges’ preferences are not as relative as they are principled, hence encompassing a deeper and higher value associated with higher pleasures that outweigh the pleasure amount argument. However, it’s important to realize that this justification takes the ideology further away from hedonism as it has now involved other higher senses and principles, which defeats the purpose of hedonism. Still, it does explain the dignity and value we as mortals attach to higher pleasures that are achieved by higher capacity exercises.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once again Socrates’ self-confidence in his education was part of his downfall as he questions Melitus about the gods and how according to him Socrates doesn’t believe in the gods at all. Melitus agrees to that statement and Socrates goes on to say that he introduces his students to other gods, not just the ones that Athenians hold dear and that he isn’t a complete atheist because he does believe in some gods. Although earlier in his speech he mentioned going to the Delphic Oracle and used that example to try and sway the Athenians it seems to backfire because of this little mention of other gods. For centuries the Greek population has been very religious and held things like the Delphic Oracle with high regard, and by mentioning that he brings in other sources of religion and gods in his teaching this can and will be seen as a source of impiety further proving their point that he doesn’t teach traditional religion to his students and is in fact guilty of impiety in Athens, but this can’t be seen as true impiety because he still acknowledges the gods he just doesn’t worship on Greek…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Dilemma The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?”…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates claims to have no knowledge of these types of things, and concedes that if he has any knowledge at all it is of worthless or trivial things. He claims that his purpose for initiating interactions with these reputedly knowledgeable people is first and foremost to prove the oracle wrong, because he believes he really knows nothing. If he can successfully prove the oracle wrong by finding someone who is indeed wiser or more knowledgeable than him, then he will be presented with the opportunity to learn something worthwhile from the person he is engaging, which is his second purpose for these interactions. Unfortunately, this proves to be an unsuccessful method of learning for Socrates because he does not actually learn the fine and good things he has sought to learn; instead he has learned that the reputedly knowledgeable people are merely ignorant of their own ignorance. He determines that they are only truly capable of giving him examples of specific instances where actions seem to showcase the thing that he is seeking knowledge of—such the examples of piety that Euthyphro describes; he also discerns that they are incapable of giving him a definitive definition that is not easily shown to be a contradiction or fallacious in some other way.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Euthyphro Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Murder” means, in a legal context, the killing of a human being by a sane and human with malicious intent (precising). In order to truly understand the definition of murder, it must be broken down into the two key components, malice and sanity, that differentiate murder from lesser crimes. First of all, it is important that the perpetrator has malicious intent when killing the victim. If there isn’t any malice involved, the crime is not as severe and would instead be classified as involuntary manslaughter or a different, lesser crime than murder. “Malicious” means malevolent (synonymous).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Euthyphro, Socrates is being prosecuted for corrupting the youth and for impiety, while Euthyphro is being charged for murder. In conversations between the two, Socrates asks Euthyphro to teach him “what is piety” (Euthyphro, pg.47). Socrates engages Euthyphro in a discussion that will help him find the meaning of piety and by doing so, Socrates can use this to defend himself against the charges he faces. In the Platonic dialogues, Plato’s defense of Socrates illustrates that Socrates is a political philosopher in question for the truth. It is important to understand that Plato and Aristophanes both had different representations of Socrates but because of the portrayal of Aristophanes’ Clouds, his play had a profound impact on Athenian society.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays