Descartes And Socrates Comparison Essay

Improved Essays
“Who exactly are we, and what does it even mean to exist?” The answer to this question is undoubtedly very complex and has been tackled by philosophers throughout time. Particularly, it has been discussed in detail by famous philosophers Descartes and Socrates. Both of these philosophers believed in the act of self-awareness. Moreover, Descartes is recognized for his famous line, “Cogito, Ergo Sum,” which is loosely translated to “I think, therefore I am.” Whereas Socrates was famous for his claim that the unexamined life is not worth living. Notably, each of these philosophers had revolutionary ideas on what it means to be a human. Now the question remains: where do I stand amidst these two viewpoints? Whose ideas on self- awareness do I believe …show more content…
In particular, I agree with Descartes that the senses can be deceitful. His wax experiment discussed in the book acknowledges this theory. As the wax gets closer to the fire, it changes shape, size, and overall appearance, which calls into question how we are able to identify it. He concludes that we are able to do this by our ability to think in three dimensions and recognize the extension, flexibility, and changeability of the wax. I agree with Descartes point that the mind has the power to reflect on or attend to its own ideas, distinct from the power of sensing and the power of imagination. For example, the perception of the world in the eyes of a bird soaring high in the sky is much different to the perception of the world in the eyes of an ant. This further proves that what we see does not necessarily prove the legitimateness of what is around us. This can also be applied to our other senses, for example in terms of touch what I consider as cold, somebody else may consider as warm. Descartes recognizes this fact and that the only thing that we can be certain of is that we exist because of our abilities to doubt and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Descartes’ criterion of knowledge lays in the mind and not in the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes can demonstrate the validity of his arguments, specifically through the use of the wax example, and ultimately has a larger framework of philosophical reasoning underlying his position than that of Montaigne. Further, Montaigne’s argument is weakened by his initial assumption that all knowledge comes from the senses. Descartes, by finding that the senses can be trusted, defeats this assumption as well as Montaigne’s…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Rene Descartes a) Rene Descartes believes that things exist simply because he thinks, therefore he is. This is beautifully illustrated when he gives us the wax example. Before giving that example, Rene Descartes did state that our senses are deceptive and so is our imagination. If we were to go by that, does that mean we exist just because we perceive it through our senses?…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hybridity And Identity

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humanity, throughout time, has become obsessed with finding and answering the questions of the universe. The questions we have asked and the questions we have answered make the world what it is today. Civilizations are now flourishing on a foundation of newfound questions to explore, yet there is one question that no matter how hard we look, no matter how much money and technology we invest into finding the answer, we have ultimately been unsuccessful in finding the true answer. Who we are and how we express ourselves may be the toughest questions to answer for one reason; we create the answer. There is nowhere we can go or something we can do to find out who we are for certain.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion on Descartes My view on Descartes Meditations are false, and I believe this because there is too many things that could go wrong in the Matrix theory. Descartes says, “I have convinced myself that there is nothing in the world-no sky, no Earth, no minds, no bodies.” I completely disagree with this because how can everything we believe in be false? I will go through how I believe Descartes is incorrect, and why I believe in this.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Appeal Of Socrates Essay

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates uses many appeals trying to defend himself against the Athenian Court; although he fails, his main appeal of logic resonates in those who convicted him. Socrates makes it apparent that even though he’s attempting to persuade the court to spare his life, he is very aware that this task will not be easily accomplished due to the years of slander instilled in others by his accusers. Socrates main point (and most powerful) is that his accusers contradict every claim they make against him. Rather it’s claiming his constant questioning of the world we live in is corrupting the youth or it be the claim that Socrates does not believe in the Athenian Gods. Socrates addresses the idea that as humans we don't have an assigned way of assuring…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes says that when he is in a dream he can feel the heat of a fire even though the fire is not there. That feeling of warmth seems real even though he is asleep. Descartes senses deceive him which makes him question if his senses are always deceptive. In Conclusion, Descartes argues that one cannot prove we exist or are part of a concrete world.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The present account will discuss Socrates’ responses to Callicles’ position on what it is that makes a person’s life good. First, I will provide a reconstruction of the two arguments made by Socrates. Secondly, I will give a critique on the arguments. The first response given by…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes arguments are not to be taken as too literal, I do think he is correct that our senses can be easily deceived. The information we receive from our senses can be mistrusted and ruin the…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates and Rene Descartes are alike in their most fundamental motives but yet contrasting in results both trying to improve thinking but about two different things. One example would be how they each convey their message formal versus informal, another would be their life style and beliefs of how things should be done. Both Socrates and Descartes have completely different views on getting their desired results, and the level of risk one is willing to take to accomplish certain results. Socrates and Descartes even had vastly different upbringing, and views on which sciences are important and others’ inferior to the rest.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, upon a closer and more rigorous examination, it is revealed that this argument is not as unsubstantiated as it seems to be. In order to understand how Descartes justifies his assertion, the concept of “clear and distinct idea” needs to be understood. Descartes’ “clear and distinct idea” involves the argument that an idea becomes clear when sharp intellectual perception is applied to it, similar to how a physical object becomes visually clear when sharp visual perception is applied to the physical object. Furthermore, the idea is distinct if it is not only clear but also excludes all other ideas that does not belong to it (Skirry). Thus, Descartes argued that the body is distinct from the mind because, after applying acute intellectual perception, Descartes perceived that the idea of the mind excludes the idea of body and the idea of the body excludes the idea of the mind therefore the mind is separate and different from the body (Skirry).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The beginning of understanding oneself starts with identity. For centuries, philosophers have contemplated a common issue known as the mind-body problem. The mind-body problem is a philosophical problem that asks the question of what we as people are. Are people a mind, a body, or a combination of the two? There are several major works that pertain to this problem, but this argument will focus on those given by Gilbert Ryle, Rene Descartes, and Richard Taylor.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays