Sociological Implications Of Capital Punishment

Amazing Essays
With Liberty and Justice for None Crime typically evokes a punishment. This only makes sense, especially when it comes to violent crimes; in 2014, the FBI reported that 1,165,383 violent crimes were reported, and violent crimes occurred almost every 26 seconds. When it comes to dealing with the most egregious offenses, some states employ capital punishment. In the United States, capital punishment involves the original sentencing, a capital case, a stay on Death Row, and, if the prisoner does not die of natural causes, the eventual execution. Although the process itself is often complex and involved, the debate surrounding it can become even more complicated, with discussions of the cost, the morals, and the most effective way to punish or …show more content…
While a case should be logical and rely on factual evidence, society has made it important to seek justice for victims and their families in some manner, despite all the problems that may arise. The immediate problem, though, is humans are emotional creatures, especially when faced with things like murder, and even more so if the murder is especially gruesome. It does make sense to want retribution, and to want a killer to suffer the same fate, at least on an emotional level. However, the death penalty at its core is immoral. When society condemns murder, it is typically for the suffering he or she caused a victim. The problem that arises is that the death penalty brings about suffering as well. In Oklahoma, Ohio, and Arizona “...the inmates suffered visibly, according to journalists covering the executions. One killing took nearly two hours” due to the use of ineffective drugs in lethal injections. In a system largely based upon morals, allowing anyone to suffer, even a criminal, is horrific. More importantly, it’s hypocritical. Society makes such a strong moral stand against murder because of the suffering it causes victims and their families. In causing other individuals to suffer, though, society does the same thing. Capital punishment brings not only physical pain to some inmates, it brings pain to the families of those who …show more content…
Not only is the system rife with bias and mistakes, it fails at every one of its purposes. If the only thing the death penalty can do is support a largely hypocritical set of morals, it has no place in the legal or penal system; especially when the overarching goal is justice for all. The United States is meant to be the land of the free and the home of the brave, but there is no freedom for those who suffered due to the death penalty, and there is no bravery in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I want closure if something happened; I want them to be punished for that. I would feel like prison is not enough for that, even a life sentence. The death penalty is wrong but is it better to have them dead? I grew up on the basis that killing, even hurting someone is morally wrong. Not only that, the law even states that too.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capital Punishment: an Act of Justice or Revenge? To many, executing the offender of a heinous and violent murder is seen as an act of justice and retribution, and is an essential aspect of maintaining moral balance, however, perhaps the stronger and more substantial position is that the death penalty is a barbarous act of revenge, motivated by emotion rather than logic. According to the “Retributive Justice Theory” those who break the law deserve to suffer punishment, and likewise, deserve to be punished in proportion to the crime committed. Under this principle, justice demands the execution of those who have committed murder as it is the most appropriate and equal punishment for such a crime, and any punishment whether it be lighter or…

    • 1554 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modern Capital Punishment

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many people have condemned capital punishment, as well as praised it. Beccaria (2010), a classical philosopher on the death penalty, heavily critiqued the entire process entailing capital punishment. His key argument is that capital punishment does not prevent the offenders, but in its place, the long-term detention makes a long lasting impression on the attention of the audience. In addition, the death penalty has injurious impacts on the society by minimizing the sensitivity to human suffering. The proponents argue that if the law was just left to be open and allow the criminals to be treated equal then, it will be very dangerous to the public (Masur,1989).…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is that last group of people that I am most concerned about at the moment. Killing, as a general rule, is immoral. Is it possible to be a virtuous person and still play a direct role in bringing about the death of another person? This is a tricky question, I admit. I honestly do not full heartedly support the death penalty, but I think there are rare cases in which it would be just and in the best interest of the safety of the general public.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Purple Shirt Analysis

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Deputy 1and 2 seem well placed in their reason but misplaced in the wish of the population to seek justice. They offer a no action plan hence offers absolutely no resolution for the people. Deputy 2 comes forth with the argument that the Grudge Informers should not be prosecuted because they were acting lawful. Although the Grudge Informers were acting lawful, the laws that some Grudge Informers used to essentially kill another person were laws that did not benefit the society in any way. The laws created by the Purple Shirts which resulted in death, if not followed were hoarding more than the permitted amount of dried, failing to provide identification papers within 5 days and listening to foreign radio broadcasts.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imposing The Death Penalty

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment can be a tough topic to discuss because people tend to have extreme views and opinions on it. The death penalty is a quality to society; it prevents possible criminals as well as serves revenge to criminals, and is in no way depraved. The arguments contrary to the death penalty regularly do not hold up when examined more thoroughly. It is vital that everyone is united on this subject, rather than having some states practice capital punishment while others do not. The death penalty can be a beneficial tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the nastiest crimes known to society.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Death Penalty

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, we can also remember who we saw next to him while crucified, Criminals and malcontents. The Death Penalty is a necessary evil to keep the world safe. To deny the importance of the Death Penalty as a punishment for simply being morally wrong is questionable when the death penalty is currently only used on those who have committed heinous crimes. Murdering rapists don’t care about society anymore.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yes, there are criminals who are considered worse than others; however, they are categorized under the same name. Capital punishment, or the killing of someone as punishment for a crime is a severely heated topic in modern society. No longer should any government resort to the death penalty no matter how severe a crime may be. The death penalty is immoral and sacrilegious. In addition, exercising the death penalty negatively affects our…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Death Penalty Debate

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe it is a great advantage because it can lower a great amount of people attempting murder. It intimidates future criminals from making crimes as well as performs revenge to the criminal and that shouldn 't be seen in a wrong way. There are many arguments against the death penalty, but they are usually not valid when looked deeply into the topic. It is important that all states come to an agreement and use death penalty rather than some states being legal and some not. The death penalty is useful in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This awareness is the root of mercy. Criminals are just like everyone else in the way they make mistakes. What’s different about criminals who are held accountable for their crimes (and there are many criminals – especially on Wall Street – who are not held accountable) is that society defines criminals by their worst mistakes. Our worst actions should not define who we are. Although it makes sense for safety reasons that violent offenders are incarcerated, we should make incarceration more humane.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics