Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural theory suggests that learning is a continual social process that never ends and how we view the world is shaped by symbolic tools like language. As a child’s cognitive function improves through social interaction, he or she learns at a social (inter-psychological) level and then at an individual level (intra-psychological), consequently expanding their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) - a concept introduced but not fully developed by Vygotsky (1978). As children grow, their skills and knowledge develop by observing someone who is more advanced than they are (i.e. an adult), hence gradually extending their ZPD (Abrams, 2018). ZPD covers all the knowledge and skills that a child cannot yet understand or perform
…show more content…
However, both philosophers also differ in other ways. For example, Vygotsky (1962) claims that language plays two critical roles in cognitive development: it is the main channel by which adults transmit information and that language itself is a powerful tool for intellectual adaptation. In this vein, children use private speech (speech spoken to oneself for self-guidance) most often while navigating difficult tasks as they attempt to self-regulate by verbally planning and organising their thoughts (Winsler et al., 2007). Conversely, Piaget (1926) claims that private speech is a sign of immaturity, bereft of any useful communicative or developmental …show more content…
However, Vygotsky’s (1976) sociocultural theory has been, and still play a more important component in the New Zealand early childhood learning curriculum, as it emphasizes the critical role of social and cultural facilitated learning via reciprocal and responsive relationships between children, adults, places, and things. Children learn through collaboration with adults and peers, through guided participation and observation of others, as well as through individual exploration and reflection (Ministry of Education, 1996, p9). A sociocultural model of literacy recognises not only the context of the home and family and the early childhood service, but also that of the community and society. The curriculum, government policy and cultural expectations all
However, both philosophers also differ in other ways. For example, Vygotsky (1962) claims that language plays two critical roles in cognitive development: it is the main channel by which adults transmit information and that language itself is a powerful tool for intellectual adaptation. In this vein, children use private speech (speech spoken to oneself for self-guidance) most often while navigating difficult tasks as they attempt to self-regulate by verbally planning and organising their thoughts (Winsler et al., 2007). Conversely, Piaget (1926) claims that private speech is a sign of immaturity, bereft of any useful communicative or developmental …show more content…
However, Vygotsky’s (1976) sociocultural theory has been, and still play a more important component in the New Zealand early childhood learning curriculum, as it emphasizes the critical role of social and cultural facilitated learning via reciprocal and responsive relationships between children, adults, places, and things. Children learn through collaboration with adults and peers, through guided participation and observation of others, as well as through individual exploration and reflection (Ministry of Education, 1996, p9). A sociocultural model of literacy recognises not only the context of the home and family and the early childhood service, but also that of the community and society. The curriculum, government policy and cultural expectations all