Society's Influence On Science And Ghostbusters

Improved Essays
Science is being seen as negative. An example of this is the X-files. The X-Files deems that alien abductions and human combustion are an everyday occurrence. Poltergeist III is another example. The movie’s psychologist, Dr. Seaton, told Carol Anne’s parents that she was not being pursued by demons, but has emotional issues. Fortunately, Carol Anne has a psychic to come and help her and her family. Unfortunately, Dr. Seaton was seen negatively because of his diagnosis of Carol Anne. The psychic is the one that ultimately saves Carol Anne and her family in the end. Ghostbusters is another one that is seen negatively. In this movie, the EPA refuses to believe that his city has ghosts or paranormal activity. The EPA suggests that the Ghostbusters are the ones that are bringing the paranormal activity to the city. Society viewed the portrayal of scientists as nerdy and/or evil years ago, but today most people view …show more content…
Science has an impact on the way society views things because science impacts our daily lives. From the air we breathe, to the water we drink, from the soil that we get our vegetables from is all a part of science. People used to think that everything that was seen on TV was true, but nowadays people are more prone to look up information from several different cites in order to find out the truth. Cloning is something that has been on the horizon for a while now. It is something that is a bit scary to think about because there is that possibility that it may not work out the way we anticipate it. You can think of cloning as being like identical twins - two beings having the exact same DNA. Is this something that we could see more of in the near future? I hope not because it is a very scary thought to have two of every living being running around on this planet.That would mean double mistakes that are happening around the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    David Skorton, in the article “Why Scientists Should Embrace Liberal Arts”, argues that scientists must supplement their science and engineering education with a study of the humanities to effectively inform the populous. Through the humanities, Skorton believes scientists can develop a better understanding of the human conditions, thus better emotionally connecting with people lacking a scientific background. Skorton’s article contributes a perspective towards solving a larger problem of the drift between the scientific community and the general public’s perception of scientific truth, particularly the scientific truths that inform politically charged debates. Skorton effectively aggrandizes the scientific community as potential saviors of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like the title “Why Scientists Should Embrace the Liberal Arts” implies, Skorton believes embracing the liberal arts will enable scientists to communicate to the public more effectively. But before we dives into how Skorton delivers his message persuasively, we need to identify his target audiences first. To start off, by publishing this essay on Scientific American under the category of science, Skorton is targeting at scientists and science enthusiasts since Scientific American is a popular science magazine in the U.S. In addition, the title of this essay itself proposes a question that asks directly to scientists. Further into this article, Skorton points to the problem by referring to controversial science topics such as common vaccines,…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Living on Earth radio segment the host interviews Chris Mooney, the author of the book Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens our Future. The host and Mooney discuses a 2009 Pew Research center poll that found that most Americans don’t believe humans have induced climate change. Mooney argues in the interview — and in his book— that there is a growing gap between scientists and the public. He argues that sciences has been politicalized in recent year, and he mentions another Pew Poll that found that Republicans— even well educated Republicans are less likely to admit Climate Change is human induced. Additionally, Democrats in the past have also been critical of certain medical vaccinations, thus he finds that both…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Delgado’s essay, “The Culture of Denial,” (2015), claims that mistrust in the scientific world is due to people’s beliefs, their ignorance and their personal agendas. Delgado demonstrates this with scientist discoveries, statistics, and explanations of people distrust in scientist conclusions, their religious beliefs and businesses apparent agendas. Delgado examines the mistrust, ignorance and the personal agendas of society in order to inform this culture to educate themselves and be open to new scientific findings. The intended audience for this essay is the general public, who is interested in the future of the scientific arena. I can relate to Christopher Delgado’s suggestion that this culture need to understand, educate,…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why We Should Trust Scientists,” by Naomi Oreskes, the presenter describes what makes science so unique, and distinguishes it from other fields such as religion. Oreskes claims that science is an appeal to authority, but unlike other similar appeals, it is the collective authority of a group of people, somewhat like a community. Throughout her speech, she conveys to her audience different examples of historical figures who worked in science, and uses them as proofs to help understand the point that she is making. In doing so, she describes that what makes this specific field so special, is the fact that science itself, and the ways that one tries to test a theory on a specific subject are not related; but rather, as was said by Paul Feyerabend…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 16th and 17th centuries, scientists began to question the long held theories of science. This new period, known as The Scientific Revolution, brought controversial opinions of political and social views. Scientists flourished with a variety of concepts, complex as the Three Laws of Motion, or as simple as the Heliocentric Model. Although we still follow these theories and support the studies of science today, life wasn’t that easy back then. Scientists were affected by many aspects of society such as church criticism, gender discrimination, and supportive leaders.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nautilus Research Paper

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Use the Nautilus as an example of how scientific technology can be both good and bad. Cite modern day examples as well, such as stem cell research or nuclear technology. Should there be regulations to curb what scientists study and how they apply their discoveries to everyday life? There are many, many different types of scientific technologies; and not all of them can be good. To contradict, not all scientific technologies can be bad.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Having a significant amount of knowledge and power to create and bring life into this world with the inovation of science can kead to a social destruction against man kind. Going against humanity and letting the power of science interfere with society with what us considered "normal" is frightining and morbid. In the classic novel, Frankeinstein by Mary Shelley, a life was created by Victor Frankenstein using the power of science and knowledge. Although Frankeinstein proved to himself that using the correct tools and with dedication you can create and make anything happen it also caused danger and destruction with the i teraction between the monster and humans.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We live in a time of great confusion and debate. While some loudly proclaim climate change a hoax, others just as strongly say it’s real. In the twentieth century scientists hypothesized that fats were bad for the body, while now they say the body requires some fats to stay healthy. How can we know if what is considered safe today won’t be dangerous in the future?…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I just know I was too scared to think and I assumed it was a ghost. In conclusion, your imagination can take over reason. Like it did in “House Taken Over”. There was no real evidence if it was a ghost or they are mentally ill or if it has a logical reason.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curiosity Killed The Cat! (Close Reading for Frankenstein) Mary Shelly’s gothic novel explicates how the thirst of excessive knowledge and curiosity combined can lead to the demise of the person, not only the person, but the whole society can be put in danger as well. The attainment of a limited amount of knowledge is not considered to be perilous; however if the limits are crossed anything can happen. According to Frankenstein, Victor’s curiosity of perceiving excessive knowledge results in the demise of his entire family, including him and his ostensible son, the monster.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, that was just plants and animals. Now today, the scientists and researchers are cloning humans. Although genetic cloning is judged, it is useful to some extent. Genetic cloning has lots of different controversies. Despite its views, evidence states that genetic cloning it is for cures for diseases/ other health problems, research or just for personal projects.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning has always been very controversial and has always caught the attention of a handful of people. It’s been debated everywhere, ever since they began their first experiments of cloning. From the first time they started cloning animals, we all knew the next big thing was going to be cloning humans. To some this is a positive thing to do, but to others they question if human cloning is allowed in our society. With all the attention towards cloning it’s developed into more than just a simple disagreement, but into an argument that has created two sides.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human Cloning Is Unethical

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Potter Stewart once said, “Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.” In the article,”Of Headless Mice…and Men” by Charles Krauthammer, it explains how it is unethical for scientists to create human clones for the sole purpose of disemboweling the body for personal needs. These human clones would be human in every form and way, however, a scientist would remove the forebrain. Although the cloning of humans would be promising for people's health, it is purely unethical and dangerous to create life and then destroy someone’s narcissistic values. The question that has been controversial for over a decade is if human cloning is unethical or not.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientist are constantly research and developing theories to better human like and the existence associate with life. This is fearful because scientists could potentially make evil humans in the near future. We also find out that the “monster” turns against him as he has no control of this human. This is something that is realistic, a scientist could make something for it to soon turn against them and they no control.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays