Some methods of engagement embrace strong elements of social change and individual empowerment. Other methods emphasize changing a particular policy or achieving a victory. Still others may involve emphasize the role of paid staff and as a result embody lesser degrees of engaging a particular constituency in the process. These different goals and methods may all have their place in the process of community change, but it is important to understand them and to know when it is appropriate and feasible to incorporate various strategies. Some communities may believe that they are engaged in social change activities that, unfortunately, may actually be perpetuating current arrangements. Social welfare practices have been implicated in oppressive processes by fostering relations of dominance that are consistent with supporting the status quo. Communities may believe they are promoting citizen empowerment when they are actually doing things for their constituency rather than doing the work with their constituency. A community that advocates for the rights of immigrants but that is composed only of the white citizen professionals …show more content…
Although empowerment is obviously an end unto itself, it also provides fuel for social change. The more individuals feel empowered, the more sustainable community organizing campaigns will be over time. Assuming there will always be a need to do social change work, it makes sense to foster the strength and solidarity of groups. It is not uncommon for community activists to overstate the amount of empowerment and social change that their activities engender. By thinking about the central elements of community organizing as a matter of degree and always in