Gladwell constantly disrupts the flow of his writing, featuring confusion in his reading. First, I found it disturbing that there was no chronological order of what Gladwell is trying to portray. An example can be found when Gladwell started his saga with the historic reference of the story of Woolworth’s lunch counter. Furthermore, the introduction shifted in various ways, misleading points as it changed from scenario to another. I am well aware Gladwell’s plot to intertwine his thoughts in between each scenario, but it wound up the destruction of the build-up of his thesis. After a recollection of his excerpt, I found out there are actually more details about the historic scenarios than his message towards his readers. Overall, I was not impressed with the bouncing of
Gladwell constantly disrupts the flow of his writing, featuring confusion in his reading. First, I found it disturbing that there was no chronological order of what Gladwell is trying to portray. An example can be found when Gladwell started his saga with the historic reference of the story of Woolworth’s lunch counter. Furthermore, the introduction shifted in various ways, misleading points as it changed from scenario to another. I am well aware Gladwell’s plot to intertwine his thoughts in between each scenario, but it wound up the destruction of the build-up of his thesis. After a recollection of his excerpt, I found out there are actually more details about the historic scenarios than his message towards his readers. Overall, I was not impressed with the bouncing of