We hoped that by using Twitter on some devices, we would be able to prove to people that the ones who check our page are the ones that are trying to be social. One of the counter arguments that often came up was that people argued that phones are just another way to communicate without face-to-face interaction. While this is true, we found a study that showed that you would remember more in class if you were actively involved with it and with the people around you. So we decided to use the Rogerian model of Argument based on the fact that we felt that it would benefit us by stating the counterargument and then list off our points. We felt that if we could disprove a counterargument, that the audience would be more inclined to listen to us and take the matter serious. By disproving the point, we felt that it would give people a better outlook on what others have to offer and how to overcome the social insecurities that often …show more content…
If we ever launch our campaign and continuously update it, it could have the potential to receive followers and possibly go somewhere. With people being more aware of the issue, classes could include so much more and therefore be more entertaining to students. The introverted students would in the end live better lives because they would have more friends to talk to instead of being by themselves or having only one person to talk to. Twitter would be an easy way to keep updating people on the issue and to keep them informed. The website would be more personal and it would allow others to interact with