Consequently, social status almost directly correlates with political identity, which in this day is a primary source of the characteristics that define humans. Our culture has viewed political identities as one of the defining characteristics of an individual 's Identity. How an individual carries themselves or acts in public is very different from the ways and individuals will act around close friends or family. Ultimately there interactions with others bring out the more reserved characteristics that an individual would like to be remembered by. An individual will act more professional and will be more mindful of his interactions. Many elected politicians and leaders within our society highlight these characteristics and are often seen as
…show more content…
First off, cultural identity is formed through community and society; in contrast political identity focuses more on the actions that one has taken because of the influences by other individuals. In an article called, “Individual identity and freedom of choice in the context of environmental and economic,” Professor Baumeister articulates that “a previously more universal form of selfhood in which identity was largely assigned to individuals by fixed circumstances of social position, exploration of inner selfhood was minimal or trivial, fulfillment was defined by society” (Baumeister 484). This quote helps us understand the academic philosophy’s made by renewed professors such as Baumeister. He believes that an “individuals selfhood” is comprised through interactions with people among our different societies. Consequently, I found It was best explained through a TED Talk titled “Tribal Leadership” by David Logan. Furthermore, within the TED Talk, Logan describes the different tribes that make up our human society. He explains that there are five different tribes and that each of these tribes make up a role within our society. Moreover, each tribe that an individual falls into usually stays consistent and depending upon the tribe an individual is apart, it will be beneficial in determining the way they will act. As an example, Logan describe the first out of the five tribes as the “life sucks” tribe. according to Logan these are the individuals who formed groups that are mostly criminals and or people who “hate life”. In contrast he references the opposite extreme for tribe number five, their name in this case was “life is great” whom make up the majority of the leaders within our society. As a person can imagine the groups in between make up a combination of the two extremes. The point of this TED Talk was not to classify individuals but
First off, cultural identity is formed through community and society; in contrast political identity focuses more on the actions that one has taken because of the influences by other individuals. In an article called, “Individual identity and freedom of choice in the context of environmental and economic,” Professor Baumeister articulates that “a previously more universal form of selfhood in which identity was largely assigned to individuals by fixed circumstances of social position, exploration of inner selfhood was minimal or trivial, fulfillment was defined by society” (Baumeister 484). This quote helps us understand the academic philosophy’s made by renewed professors such as Baumeister. He believes that an “individuals selfhood” is comprised through interactions with people among our different societies. Consequently, I found It was best explained through a TED Talk titled “Tribal Leadership” by David Logan. Furthermore, within the TED Talk, Logan describes the different tribes that make up our human society. He explains that there are five different tribes and that each of these tribes make up a role within our society. Moreover, each tribe that an individual falls into usually stays consistent and depending upon the tribe an individual is apart, it will be beneficial in determining the way they will act. As an example, Logan describe the first out of the five tribes as the “life sucks” tribe. according to Logan these are the individuals who formed groups that are mostly criminals and or people who “hate life”. In contrast he references the opposite extreme for tribe number five, their name in this case was “life is great” whom make up the majority of the leaders within our society. As a person can imagine the groups in between make up a combination of the two extremes. The point of this TED Talk was not to classify individuals but