Social Contract Theory: Stranded After An Airplane Crash

Improved Essays
Social Contract Theory: Stranded after an airplane crash. The Social Contract Theory states “We are all by nature largely, or entirely, self-interested. What we want is power over others, physical security, plenty of money and sensual pleasure.” (pg. 194). However, not everyone can be on the top of the heap. Therefore, if we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another. (pg. 194) In the scenario given, we have two options. Take control or enter into a social contract. Given that both groups are equal (at this point we will leave the guns out of it) only having small pocket knives as weapons, we could enter a social contract to curb our self interest in order to have a better life working together

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the stories of “The Devil and Tom Walker”, “The Black Cat”, and “Fences”, this remains true. Humans find themselves often caught in situations where they must choose between being honest or selfish. Many times people want more and more, regardless of the fact they might already have just enough. Whether it’s power, money, or love, people constantly want it all. The importance is understanding that when it comes to greed, it is easy to fall deep into the gallows of…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atlantic Revolutions in a Global Context ¥ From the mid-eighteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century, a series of uprisings shook states and empires from Russia to China and from Persia to West Africa. ¥ There were several aspects of the North American, French, Haitian, and Spanish American revolutions that make them distinct and clearly part of the Atlantic Basin. ¥ The intellectual impact of the Enlightenment created a trans-Atlantic print culture, wherever ideas were changed and debated.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group Observation Paper

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the social exchange theory, humans are considered to be rational beings. The theory saw that human beings made rational decisions based on the amount of information available to them. With that being said, these decisions are made to receive the greatest reward with the less amount of cost. For example, when the group was deciding what topic to pick for the role play. They use what information they already had available to them.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Out of fear, blame is often presented to those who come off as an easy target. Taking the easy way out seems a lot simpler then risking oneself pride and status, and this way creates a multitude of problems. Not only is the blame made off of assumptions and past grudges, but oftentimes the accusations are made from a type of deeply felt resentment that boils below. Whether this blame is made based on skin color or reputation, or whether the accusation is made out of a sense of greed and want for more, the scenario is that oftentimes taking the easy way out becomes a much more complicated circumstance.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most people take for granted many things we are afforded in this day and age. One of those things we take for granted is the government. Without said government there would be no laws to provide order and security, and we would be in a state of nature that would result in a state of war. A state of nature, regardless of who is detailing its differences, is basically a life without government rule leaving people to act out of self-preservation. A place without government is a place of chaos with everyone acting of their own accord.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social contract theory is based on the view that our moral and political obligations depended on a widely held agreement to form our current society. The benefit to living in this type of arrangement is that it protects our most basic rights. One of the drawbacks is that it is up to society as a whole to create some kind of balance between moral responsibility and personal freedom. So for a price (limited freedom) we receive in exchange a government who promises to protect us from people who might want to harm us.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public goods are benefits that the government provides for everyone. Examples of public goods include National Security, Rule of Law, street lamps, and roads. Collective action refers to action taken by people with shared interests assembled into groups, called factions, to achieve a common objective, e.g. to encourage a new ideal for their community. It is often difficult to organize collective action to achieve public goods because people are self­interested.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Hedonism

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Answer the following questions: (answer a, b, and c) a. True or False: According to hedonism, physical pleasures are the only things intrinsically valuable. False b. True or False: According to Utilitarianism, justice is intrinsically valuable.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lone Survivor Ethical Dilemma: Defending What is Right No Matter the Consequences The ethical dilemma in Lone Survivor is one that hits most American viewers close to home. Happening early in the movie, it toys with our morals.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the comparison of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau and their respective ideas of The Social Contract I would like to begin by breaking down what the Social Contract is and all its encompassing ideas. The concept of social contract theory is that before civilization man lived in the state of nature in its purest form. There was no central body of governance and no law to regulate society. This meant there were hardships and oppression on certain sections of the society because they had nobody fighting for them. To overcome from these hardships people entered into agreements known as “social contracts”.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two writings, On the State of Nature by Thomas Hobbes, and Lord of the Flies by William Golding are two very intellectual ways of thinking. The two writings have some different viewpoints and understandings. Although there are some differences between both writings, the basis of their writings are focused around the idea that politics, and laws are formed from a social contract. Social contracts are a form of government when no government is officially appointed, leaving the decision of who should be in power up to the people. Thomas Hobbes stated, “Hereby it is manifest, that during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Rousseau differ in their ideas on the state of nature, Hobbes has a negative view, while Rousseau believes we were better off in the state of nature. The basis for their different ideas on the state of nature contribute to their diverging ideas on their accounts of government by social contract. Hobbes argues for citizens relinquishing their authority to the state, while Rousseau contends for the sovereign authority to be in the hand of the citizens. I will argue that Rousseau makes a more convincing argument because it is one of compromise rather than extremism. Hobbes’ account of government by social contract is based on the basic principle and rational that people give up some of their rights in order to feel secure.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Theory is an agreement between the people and the government that the people will obey the government as long as the government serves in a capacity that protects the rights of the people and furthers the good for the general will. Before we consent, we exist in the state of nature. In the state of nature, we follow natural law. Natural law comes from God. Natural law gives us our natural rights, which we are promised because of our personhood.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Personal Ethics Reflection

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Selfishness or happiness? These are the questions this paper will attempt to summarize from my perspective and describe my viewpoint of the world. A…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays