1. Karl Marx and Max Weber have contradict ideas of social class, in which Marx claims social class explains economic status between bourgeoisies and the proletariats, and consequently leads to inequalities; while Weber stands social class can be separated as three dimensions, which are class, status and party and economic status cannot explained inequalities.
Marx and Karl’s ideas of status both high related to social class. In terms of Marx concept, he regards everything is simplified to bourgeoisies and the proletariats. Political interests are flown from class attempt, which are mostly from bourgeoisies to the proletariats. Basically, bourgeoisies tried to reach the maximum profit by suppressing the proletariats. As a result, conflicts …show more content…
For instance, when a parent invests more economic resources into children, they have higher opportunities to gain more cultural capital so as to possibly achieve a higher position in social capital. All kind of capitals are tightly packed together, and form a positive domino effects.
In the “Cycling matches the Pace and Pitches of Tech” article, I found a large interconnection between social and cultural capital. People who are in the cycling clubs, are the professional employer, by joining the cycling group, they share experience, hunt job and making business. In terms of Bourdieu, those people who already obtain cultural capitals whom are specialist; and thus enlarge their social capital by a cycling social network group. Cultural and social capital are interchangeable because people are investing time into social network group and gaining back one’s working statues.
The second article “Silicon Valley’s Lust for High-end Bikes” can support this assumption; people utilize the cycling network as a way to fill in job openings, it creates a win-win situation since people are switching from social, cultural and economic
Marx and Karl’s ideas of status both high related to social class. In terms of Marx concept, he regards everything is simplified to bourgeoisies and the proletariats. Political interests are flown from class attempt, which are mostly from bourgeoisies to the proletariats. Basically, bourgeoisies tried to reach the maximum profit by suppressing the proletariats. As a result, conflicts …show more content…
For instance, when a parent invests more economic resources into children, they have higher opportunities to gain more cultural capital so as to possibly achieve a higher position in social capital. All kind of capitals are tightly packed together, and form a positive domino effects.
In the “Cycling matches the Pace and Pitches of Tech” article, I found a large interconnection between social and cultural capital. People who are in the cycling clubs, are the professional employer, by joining the cycling group, they share experience, hunt job and making business. In terms of Bourdieu, those people who already obtain cultural capitals whom are specialist; and thus enlarge their social capital by a cycling social network group. Cultural and social capital are interchangeable because people are investing time into social network group and gaining back one’s working statues.
The second article “Silicon Valley’s Lust for High-end Bikes” can support this assumption; people utilize the cycling network as a way to fill in job openings, it creates a win-win situation since people are switching from social, cultural and economic