Snyder V. Phelps: A Peaceful Report

Improved Essays
The Supreme Court's ruling in Snyder v. Phelps was fair because they are protected by freedom of speech, it was a peaceful protest, and because they weren't right next to the funeral.

One reason why this ruling was fair was because the protesters were protected by freedom of speech. In the 1st Amendment of the United States Constitution, it states that people have the right to express their thoughts freely. No matter what pain or grief they were causing towards Snyder, they were still under the protection of the freedom of speech.

Another reason why this ruling was fair was because it was a peaceful protest. The definition of a peaceful protest is a nonviolent resistance to express things such as thoughts or beliefs. These people are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This case involving freedom of speech is an example of fundamental rights. Fundamental rights are universally known rights that cannot be broken. In the Churchill versus Waters case, Churchill’s first amendment rights of freedom of speech were violated. She shouldn’t of been fired for speaking about public concerns. She had the right to share her beliefs.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Black Panthers was a group who stood up for themselves. They wanted to fight against the movement and win equality. But as you think of different types of protesting and how non-violent might be better that isn’t…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Author Background Philippa Strum the author of “When the Nazis came to Skokie” was born in New York City on December 14, 1938. Philippa Strum is well versed in the fields of political science and legal studies as she would obtain her graduate degree from Harvard and her Ph.D. from The New School located in New York City. Philippa Strum would become a professor of political science at City University in New York where she would tech for over two decades. Ms. Strum was also once a professor of constitutional law at Wayne State University Law School, while also traveling and lecturing to schools across the country. Along with books on freedom of speech Ms. Strum has also published a book appropriately titled and covering “Mendez v. Westminster”…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the Supreme Court thought differently. In the case Snyder v. Phelps, the Supreme court ruled 8-1, in favor of Westboro Baptists. Hate speech is protected under the first amendment. Even after the ruling, Albert Snyder believes “everyone deserves to be buried in peace”. I agree with Snyder.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling, which occurred during the Vietnam War, granted the students the right to express their political opinions as long as they did not disrupt the classroom. Their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights could not be restricted based on a “general fear of disruption,” which is what the administration argued. According to Justice Fortas, who wrote the majority opinion, the protest was a “silent, passive expression of opinion.” Though a few hostile comments had been made to the students who were wearing armbands, there had been no threats or acts of violence. Also, there had not been any findings that the armbands would substantially interfere with school operations or more importantly, harm the rights of other students.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3rd + Possible 4th Paragraph: Supreme Court Rulings The have been plenty of public cases through history about free speech, and what constituted as free speech. There have been some that ended in the protection of the certain act, and some of the cases resulted in the act becoming illegal. One of the most notable cases of an act becoming illegal is Schenck v. United States, which took place in 1919.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many cases over the course of history that have changed the way we go about our lives today, but the one that’s genuinely made an impact on my life is the case of Miranda v. Arizona. I didn 't choose this case because of it’s popularity or history behind it, I chose it because of what the outcome represents for us as a society: security. “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to speak to an attorney.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roe v. Wade was not the first point in history abortion was discussed. Prior to the court case, many states, and eventually the Supreme Court, ruled on the constitutionality of state laws which preluded Roe v. Wade. In 1879, a Connecticut law was enacted stating that any one person who attempted through medical means to prevent conception of a child should “be fined not less than forty dollars or imprisoned no less than sixty days” (“Griswold v. Connecticut…”). This meant that any form of contraceptive (i.e. birth control, condoms, and abortion) was illegal in the eyes of the Connecticut state court. In 1939, the Waterbury Maternal Health Center in Waterbury, Connecticut was raided by police for their practice which helped “married women who could not afford private…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Free Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I’m here to express my views on the U.S. vs. Fields a very distinct and intriguing case that involves the topic of free speech. First we have the defendant Abel Fields who was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act, after Mr. Fields portrayed himself claiming that he had “military experience” claiming he had a Purple Heart, also the Medal of Honor, Navy Cross, and even the Air force cross. This made him believe that it gave him the right to speak with authority on the issues but these claims were false. Abel Fields appealed his decision to the court, stating that he viewed the Stolen Valor Act as unconstitutional and believes that his right to the first amendment was being violated. Field’s prosecutors argue that even though Mr. Fields…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tinker v. Des Moines case deals with the persecution of a group of students for wearing black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War. The group of students, siblings John F. and Mary Beth Tinker, and friend Christopher Eckhardt, were suspended for wearing the war protesting armbands after they refused to take them off. School officials argued that the students wearing the armbands may result in riots, due to the division of peoples’ opinions on the Vietnam War. The case eventually made its way to the United States Supreme Court, where it was decided in a 7-2 ruling that the suspension of the students violated their freedom of speech and expression.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    March 10th, 2003. While tensions were building in the middle east and the Unites States was looking to invade Iraq, a country band called The Dixie Chicks was on stage on London, England. When introducing their song “Travelin’ soldier”, lead singer Natalie Maines, a Texas native, made a very controversial statement that would cause a massive stir and lead to the downfall of the very popular band. She stated “Just so you know, we’re on the good side with y’all. We do not want this war, this violence, and we’re ashamed that the president of the United States is from Texas” (History.com).…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay Pride Pros And Cons

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gay Pride How about legalized protest for gay pride? Gay pride protest and demonstrations should remain legal because people have freedom of speech, their right to protest and their right to be treated like everybody else“Gay pride was not born out of need to celebrate being gay, but instead our right to exist without persecution. So maybe instead of wondering why there isn’t a straight pride month or movement, straight people should be thankful they don’t need one” quoted anonymous. People have the right to join with fellow citizens in a protest or peaceful assembly is critical to a functioning demonstrations shows at the core of the First Amendment.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays