Issue Presented by the Case The first issue presented in this case refers to the allegation of the breach of contract for insurance coverage provided by Steven Lucas. The second issue presented in the case is whether or not Steven Lucas is responsible for providing false information to potential clients. The third issue presented in this case refers to the accountability of Nunn and Vaden examining the policy and what the insurance program entails. Plaintiff…
We are writing to provide you with an update to our site cleanup and remediation efforts, specifically as it relates the holdback provision of our Agreement. As you are aware, the site due diligence and soils investigations we completed during our acquisition process confirmed the presence of contaminated and/or impacted soils at 50 Ann St. which require clean-up and removal prior to us being able to advance our residential re-development proposal. Our Agreement with you requires that prior to us advancing clean-up of the site, that we provide you with notice in advance of excavation to allow you the opportunity to retain a third party engineer to evaluate our findings and our proposed remediation program. Please accept this letter as the required formal notice. Our consultant, Trafalgar Environmental, has conducted extensive investigations on Site…
Plaintiff at trial was Cellco Partnership, now Appellant. Defendant at trial, Shelby County, now Appellee. Facts: Cellco Partnership, Appellant, originally entered a lease agreement in 1995 with Cellco Partnership (Verizon) allowing an easement to Stonebridge Water Tower. In 2000, Highway 64 learned that Verizon had installed cellular equipment on Stonebridge Water Tower and accused them of trespassing and threatened to file a suit against them. In 2001, Verizon (Cellco Partnership) filed a complaint against Shelby County and Highway 64 seeking a declaratory judgement stating the Verizon has the right to use the gravel access road or a declaratory judgement stating that Shelby County must provide Verizon with access to Stonebridge Water Tower, security from Shelby County to cover liability Verizon incurred from third parties as a result of a breach of the Verizon Lease, and an injunction…
At first Gupton and Village Key was entered into a nonjury trial on September 1, 1993. Here the trial judge based their decision on a 1990 amendment section 542.33 even though the non-compete agreement was in 1989. The trial jury ruled in favor of Gupton, but declined to enjoin Gupton engaging in competing business against Village Key. This injunction banned Gupton from using any trade secrets that he gained from his employment at Village Key. However the nonjury judges also stated that this injunction doesn’t include those customers that had left Village Key to go to Gupton without any soliciting.…
Due to a design chance, additional land rights are needed across the Richtree Enterprises, LLC. The construction of these improvements requires the following land rights, as shown on the plat(s) attached to the enclosed agreement(s): DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES OF 257 SQ. FT. Pursuant to Virginia Code §…
Peoples Trust Company sued Saul and Elaine Kozuck on issues of liability and service of process regarding a promissory note given to the defendants. These issues were submitted to a jury and the jury ruled in favor of Peoples Trust Company. The court reserved Kozuck’s decision to contend this decision. This case has been written for New Jersey Superior Court by Judge…
Complainant, who is African-American, alleges that Respondent Argo Tea (Argo Tea) denied him full use of a public accommodation based on his race. Complainant further alleges that Respondent Chicago Park District (Park District), who is the owner of the land, failed to monitor its agreement with Argo Tea to allow the public entry without making purchases, and effectively discriminated against him based on his race. As background, Complainant states that Argo Tea entered into an agreement in which it has been granted the privilege to operate on public land owned by the Park District contingent upon Argo Tea’s compliance with a contractual agreement that it would remain open to the public regardless of whether they make a purchase or not.…
Application of the law to the facts We the legal team for Greene 's Jewelry will assess all the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed argument in court. The lawsuit provides us with the opportunity to introduce different directions for the arguments needed to be made in the courts; from the case laws, regulations, and substantive law. By Utilizing these resources, in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson it is believed that a favorable decision will be made on behalf of Greene 's Jewelry in both cases. Taking a sufficient amount of time to analyze the details of the case we have come to the conclusion that the focal point and the strength of our argument in the lawsuit against Ms Lawson is that she intentionally violated her contract.…
) ) The Plaintiff, Carl Ameche (hereinafter “Ameche”), complaining of the Defendants, Margie Congdon (hereinafter “Congden”) and Maple Meadows Campground (hereinafter “Maple”) would show unto this Honorable Court as follows: JURISDICTION ALLEGATIONS 1. Ameche is a citizen and…
Introduction Thank you for contacting me about the above-entitled case against Mount Ararat Baptist Church. This letter reviews our conversation as well as brings forth new information in the case. • We spoke about the available legal remedies to prevailing complainants in discrimination cases. 43 P.S. § 959(f). • You stated that the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission is unable to make the respondent give the complainant the position.…
Purchasing Get Tanked (GT) A meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Armstead will need to be arranged in order to understand each party’s motives and expectations. Teams consisting of President Mr. Harding, General Manager Mr. Toth, Controller Ms. Boyce and an external consultant with M&A expertise[ ]should be formed in order to develop a strong strategy to negotiate and supervise the acquisition. The team should consider the following principles before negotiating [ ]: Understand the other party’s motives Research Know your alternatives …
Re: Timbervest Partners A, L.P. - Sale of Timbervest Fund Management Business Joel, I received your letter requesting the transfer of the sale of Timbervest Fund Management to Domain Timber Investments. Not disclosed is the reason for the proposed sale. Another non addressed issue is the poor performance of Timbervest versus other timber related investment comparisons. At the Timbervest investment promotional meeting at Mesirow Financial in Highland Park, IL.…
Case 13.3 Kohel v. Bergen Auto Enterprises, LLC Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, 2013. 2013 WL 439970. Issue: This case involved allegations of breach of contract involving which parties and for what actions?…
Writing Assignment 3 2.1 Standing to Sue Facts: An Idaho couple, Jack and Maggie Turton, purchased a house in Jefferson County directly across from a gravel pit. Years later the county converted the pit into a landfill that collected environmentally harmful trash including: major appliances, animal carcasses, containers with hazardous content, leaking car batteries, and waste oil. The couple complained to the county but the county refused to act.…
James, Adjou, Sylvia, Bob and Tim (represented by Ian) require identifying and advice as to the applicability of relevant contract and tort/delict principles to the current scenario presented in the problem question. Before proceeding with advising the individual’s, we need to check the validity of the contract and to establish the note displayed on the car windscreen is “Invitation to Treat” (or) “Offer”. The difference between the two is significant and need to be specifically identify, as the ‘invitation to treat’ cannot be accepted legally and an offer is an expression of willingness to contract on the specified terms without further negotiation and which is legally accepted.…