SNC did not respond quickly to enemy contact. For example, SNC or the fire team had no clue as to what direction the enemy contact was coming from. SNC did maintain focus of the mission and was able to lead his fire team in the success of…
SNC issued a complete five paragraph order and insured all subordinates understood the mission. SNC used a high tone voice which signified that SNC was confident. The content of the order made sense And SNC developed an initial plan prior to starting the execution. SNC had to make adjustments immediately at the start of the mission. SNC received feedback from his fire team, using their ideas to formulate another plan.…
SNC was nervous, used frequent pet words and took extended pauses while briefing his order. SNC’s enemy’s most likely course of action did not reflect the information which was briefed to him. SNC’s initial plan consisted of misused tactical control measures and was very confusing. SNC’s tasks consisted of just assigning fire team billets to subordinates and did not reflect any critical thought about his assigned mission. SNC’s brief contained multiple unnecessary pieces of information and contradictory statements.…
Candidate McNeely was confident in briefing his five paragraph order and provided his team with accurate information. Additionally, SNC provided a clear mission statement to his fire team members with all the key elements. During execution, SNC was effective in directing his fire team, indicated by constant hand and arm signals and constant eye contact during the forward movement of the fire team. Additionally, SNC quickly assessed the problem and changed formations in order to ensure his fire team momentum was sustained. SNC was eventually able to place himself in a position that would allow him to view his fire team.…
He presented a well-rehearsed Physical Readiness Training and a flawless Squad Drill. SPC John firm understanding and implementation of Land Navigation techniques allowed him to complete the land navigation course flawlessly within the prescribed time. SPC John proved his technical knowledge and…
SNC was able to make adjustments to the plan and adapt their scheme of maneuver based on some of the suggestions…
SNC was able to plot and give a correct azimuth and distance in the allotted time. SNC briefed a below average five paragraph order. The information briefed to his team leaders was not detailed. SNC did not brief the Enemy or Friendly Situation according to the Op Order briefed the night before. SNC clearly demonstrated that he does not understand all the elements of a Five Paragraph Order.…
According to my personal experiences and past conversations I’ve come across many moments that make me agree with Tannen and her ideas. One, for example, was when person A told person B “ I am going on a hike” , Person B says “ wow ok thanks for inviting me “. This causes an argument between both people because person A simply said he was going on a hike person B assumes she was not invited because person A used the phrase “I”. Person B thinks that there is a metamessage in the conversation when she simply could’ve just asked to come along. This can create an argument because the two speakers aren't operating on the same level of talk as Tannen points out, one speaker was making more of a statement but also making the invitation for the other…
Week 5 Written Assignment B: RAC AUDIT I would appeal the RAC findings because I am an upfront and honest person, who believes light will be shed on all darkness, money is the root of all evil; but we need it to survive. The person that I am, I always try my best to be a perfectionist, by doing right thing all the time. I made it a goal to live my life without sin, every day. By practicing to becoming a perfectionist, it has made it easier to prevent the wrongful actions, but there have been times where mistakes happen.…
Noone likes having arguments including me and my family. At the beginning, my parent's arguments were usually about big things like finding jobs, passing driving exams, and money. Later on, they started to argue easily. Even the small thing such as which restaurant or which store they should go, as long as they have different opinions then the argument would start. At that time, I understood for them that they had so much stress in life.…
The fine-tuning argument for God’s existence is a version of the teleological argument. This argument states that there is a need of an explanation for why the universe is the way it is. The argument claims that the way the universe is confirms the theory that there is an intelligent creator/being otherwise known as God. The reason so is because that intelligent creator/being created the universe with purpose of their being life and that life being supported. This then brings up the question what about the universe needs an explanation?…
Cleanthes' argument from design for God's existence is not convincing. He compares two different ideas and thus, wrongly generalizes. He also commits a fallacy, and doesn’t meet the criteria necessary for the type of argument he offers. Although, a few potential strong points are present in his beliefs, like the improbability of chance, and the incomprehensible evidence of God, they are still not strong enough for His justification. Cleanthes through an a posteriori, inductive argument claims that since the presence of small machines (i.e. houses) implies human design, the presence of an even bigger machine (i.e. the universe) implies a human-like intelligence behind it as well as "the adapting of means to ends in natural and human machines…
The first step towards an ethical and virtuous life for Zhu Xi is by consciously making the choice to follow the Way. He acknowledges that the Way can be taught to anyone, but it can only be fully embraced by those who choose it. Gardner mentions “that is, for Zhu, although the proper path is clear and traversable, man must want to take it; he must actively decide to pursue it” (130). Once one has accepted the right path, one can begin the process of learning, which Zhu Xi emphasizes greatly in his commentary. “Only by learning can they realize the Way and become superior men” (Gardner 130).…
Cassidy, Great job explaining why gun control would not be efficient to U.S. citizens. There were a lot of great points raised, for example, the fact that guns are not the only weapons which produce deadly results. The self-protection argument proclaims that criminals are less likely to target private citizens who are able to carry concealed weapons or those who have weapons in their homes (Alvarez & Bachman, 2014, p. 57), which are perfect examples of the impact guns have on citizens who feel the need for protection. If criminals were to burglarize a home, they definitely would avoid the homes in which they suspect the owners are bearing arms. I agree that gun laws are created in effort to protect citizens, however they ultimately produce…
The means by which the Command was structured was very confusing and caused a plethora of communication discrepancies. At one point, a Navy SEAL commander cut his radio off to completely shut off the direction of an Army commander. Because of this, that Army commander could not warn this Navy commander and his SEALs of possible enemy activity in their proposed insertion point. This led to a very unfortunate incident in which a SEAL’s life and an Army aircraft were lost.…