I thik you should be held accoutable for the thigs you post online. I think this because if someone was aware that their oline presence was being looked at, that might prevent them from making negeative statements online that could potentially create unwanted drama. I think the virtuous lens would be best to adress this question, bcause it persuades people to be "good", and do what is morally right.
I do agree with the outcome of the Smyth vs Pillsbury Company case. If Smyth had used his own personal email, rather than the company's email, the story most likely would have turne out differently. But because he used a professional company email, where there was no where stated in the policy that privcy would be given, it seemed obvious to me
I do agree with the outcome of the Smyth vs Pillsbury Company case. If Smyth had used his own personal email, rather than the company's email, the story most likely would have turne out differently. But because he used a professional company email, where there was no where stated in the policy that privcy would be given, it seemed obvious to me