Small Group Communication In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
12 Angry Men Essay The movie, “Twelve Angry Men” can enlighten us on the topic of small group communication, giving an understanding both good and bad, about the structure and makeup of a group. As the story unfolds, it becomes evident that the jury must reach a decision of guilty or not guilty judgement in a capital murder case. The man on trial is a Latino teenager, accused of murdering his abusive father. If the young man is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death. While examining the jury, there are several differences of opinions, or bias that affect the way each individual will vote. Analyzing the group dynamics, gives the reader insight into each character’s personality as well as how the ways of thinking may influence each person’s …show more content…
The defendant can’t remember all of the details of his alibi the night of the incident, several witnesses testified that they heard screaming, and another said she had seen the boy stabbed his father with her own two eyes, and flee the scene of the crime. Looking at the men responsible for deciding the fate of this young man, you can immediately identify profound personality traits of each juror, by the way that they vote. Originally tension was established within the group due to people thinking that others were operating within their individual role, expressing doubts and opinions between each other to satisfy their individual interest in the decision making process. The individual role is defined as “Roles that focus more on individuals own interests and needs, than on those of the group (Dunn and Goodnight). As the story unfolds you begin to see the jurors enter their group role. Group Role is defined as “The shared expectations group members have regarding each individual’s communication behavior in the group” (Dunn and …show more content…
As the group begins to listen to each other they begin to respect one another’s opinions. By never declaring why he decided to vote not guilty, Henry Fonda, was perceived as to be looking for a solution to the problem of analyzing the facts. By maintaining a positive attitude, Henry Fonda, sets the tone for cooperation and peace between group members, despite personal opinions like these, “We don’t owe him nothing, he got a fair trial didn’t he?” (Twelve Angry Men). It should be easy with statements like the last one, to see the major challenges that were overcome during the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos is appeal based on emotion. Emotional or motivational appeals to make your audience feel the way you intend for them to feel. Juror eight stated, “this boy has been hit so many times in his life that violence is practically a normal state of affair. I can’t see two slaps in the face provoking him into committing murder” (12 angry men 1957). This statement evokes an emotional pity; as a result, the jury gets a glimpse of the boys’ upbringing.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men: Why So Serious? In 1957 the critically acclaimed film 12 Angry Men was released; the film is based on Reginald Rose’s screenplay of the same name. Although the film had a disappointing box office opening, today 12 Angry Men is considered a classic because of the complicated and absorbing issues it deals with. The twelve angry men cleverly alluded to in the title are in fact the jury of a court case involving violence, deceit, and death. The jury must decide the fate of a young Hispanic man accused of violently stabbing and killing his father.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Guilty.” (Rose 26) Juror #8 was able to persuade another juror into believing that the boy was innocent of any crime. Juror #8 persuaded the other jurors by arguing the facts and making the other jurors see them in a new light. Juror #8 did not lie or bully the other juror to believe in his side of the story instead he argued the alternate facts of the case because Juror #8 is looking at the case from as unbiased a view as he can attempt. Juror #8 is trying to offer the boy compassion and fairness instead of mistrust and hatred like some of the other jurors. In The Crucible, Abigail demanded the other girls listen to her and she told them this, “Let either of you breather a work, or the edge of a word, about the other thing, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you.”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 In 12 Angry Men

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The movie Twelve Angry Men is mainly about members of the jury and their varied reactions towards a murder trial of a young man accused of stabbing his father to death. The movie shows how their decisions are based mainly on their own characteristics and personal life experiences. The testimony of witnesses, evidences provided were taken for granted and without even analyzing the case, were ready to give their verdict as guilty, to get it done and over with so they could go about their own business. Because of one Juror and his dissemination of evidences and witness testimony, the others started to see things in a different perspective. Juror 3 is an angry father who is shown as a rude and arrogant man.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was stated that the boys murdered their parents out of self-defense, fearing for their lives after years of abuse. To clarify, this argument was an “Imperfect self-defense, in most legal contexts, allows defendants to contend that they had killed out of fear that their lives were threatened, a fear that might seem groundless to an impartial outsider observer but that the defense maintained seemed real to the defendants because of prolonged psychological or sexual abuse.”(Spare Menendez's). The brothers had claimed that both their mother and father had been physically and emotionally abusing them since they were children. A cousin of the family testified for the defense and said, “Lyle was just 8 when he told her 'he was afraid to sleep in his own bed because his father and him had been touching each other down there”(Cousin Breaks Silence). This further backed the…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A story that takes place during summer in a blazing hot jury room, filled with twelve hot-tempered men, is the defendant really guilty? In 12 Angry Men, by Reginald Rose, a young boy is accused of killing his own father ruthlessly with a knife. It is now the duty of the twelve jurors to corroborate and come up with a fair verdict. Some jurors uses emotion to deal with the case, while others uses logic and provided strong evidence to support their claim. Juror Four and Juror Eight are similar in the way that they are both open-minded, take the trial seriously, and they also use logic to analyze problems.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors. The film also explores the wanton destruction of life that the jury room presents, as well as how easy it is to accuse someone erroneously.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also. So they did a vote, but this vote was different it was a private vote. So the twelve men all casted in their votes. The foramen received the votes and open each on eagerly to see what the vote was. There was one more not-guilty vote.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays