Dehumanization Of The Death Penalty Essay

Superior Essays
Ferguson, Baltimore, Milwaukee, and Charlotte have made a very short list in the United States of America. They have been all over the media, full of vibrant people, and they seem to all have a new glow to them. As reality sets in, the media coverage is of riots, the vibrant people appear to be out of a 1960’s history textbook rioting, and that new glow is the fire from locally owned business being looted. The most bizarre aspect of these 1960’s type scenes, is that most of the riots are in support of a guilty individual who died trying to evade or harm police officers. Today, police officers are often dehumanized by the media, and things like the death penalty are used to humanize murders. When my cousin, Officer Justin Sollohub, was killed in the line of duty, justice ran its …show more content…
Was the death penalty going to give closure to a life cut short? Critics of the death penalty, and those who typically humanize the criminals who are at risk of dying at the hands of the state, will point out that America kills more prisoners than any other country (Slow Death of the Death Penalty). While this may be true, there is not a lot of support to say that the accuracy of other countries numbers are accurate. Critics also say that it would be much more humane to give a murderer life in prison without parole, instead of the death penalty (Slow Death of the Death Penalty). However, as shown multiple times, “the death penalty acts as the ultimate retribution for the victim and his or her family and friends. In addition to being a retributive institution, capital punishment acts as a deterrence measure” (Gibson). Also, contrary to what many critics say about the death penalty as opposed to long prison terms, the evidence shows that as prison terms increase, it does not deter any more amount of crime (Gibson). It is almost as if, once the criminal decides to commit a crime, thirty years might as well be life

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of capital punishment, one controversial issue has been whether or not the death penalty benefits the states that enforce capital punishment. On the one hand, those who oppose the death penalty argues that capital punishment is inhumane and should not be used to end someone’s life. On the other hand, those in favor of capital punishment firmly believe that the death penalty is the only way to make the world just. My own view is: the death penalty gives life value and justice; it helps reduce prison crowding, and ensures public safety. Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty brings out heavy emotion, regardless of which way you believe. However, there are several reasons why punishments other than the death penalty should be used. The death penalty cost considerably more than other punishments. The evidence shows that the death penalty does not prevent the act of murder. There have also been multiple cases of innocent people being executed first and proven innocent later.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly. The first type of murderer who deserves to be on death row is the killer of numerous people all at one time. It is hard to fathom that such a person would do something so terrible to innocent lives. Edward Koch, former mayor of New York, states, “when we protect guilty lives, we give up innocent lives in exchange” (487). Koch’s point could not be more true because, if we fail to put someone on death row for mass murder the we do not avenge the innocent lives that were taken.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes. The death penalty is a capital punishment where criminals that have been convicted are put to death by the government (Issitt).…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By some estimates, seeking death adds at least $1 million to the cost of a murder trial, and some death penalty cases cost 20 times as much as the average life-without-parole prosecution.” Many people would agree that it isn’t worth the money to seek the death penalty and instead just pay for the person to stay in prison for the rest of their life. However, others like Don Hambidge say that, “ Safety is better than convenience.” If the person going to prison is going there for life, and not having any chance of seeing the outside world again, and convicted of killing someone else, what would stop them from not killing or hurting someone else in…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many pros and cons to the death penalty. Pros being that it will prevent the criminals from committing another crime, similar or different to the one committed previously, the death penalty costs less than LWOP, the criminals received the same punishment that they put upon someone else. The death penalty is also reassuring for the victims and families. Although there are pros there are cons such as an innocent person who was wrongfully accused of the crime would be killed, a person with a mental impairment could be charged for something they could not absolutely control, people disagreeing with the death penalties could become enraged and start arguments and riots. The use of the death penalty may soon increase and criminals who have committed a capital crime will be punished…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the government would save a whole lot more money with executions as opposed to locking criminals up for life. Also, they also argue that because of the absence of the death penalty in some areas, criminals get cocky and are more likely to commit heinous crimes such as murder because they know that the government won’t sentence them to the death row. And lastly, Death penalty is a just punishment for crimes committed against the rights to life, freedom and safety of…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When a family has to go through losing a loved one to murder they experience sadness and pain more than some people understand. Those who believe that, say the death penalty gives a family closure by knowing that the suspect is going down death row. The evidence, however, overwhelmingly supports the argument shown from the Longmire and Vollum (2007) that, of more than 150 cases, only 17% found feelings of peace while 20% explicitly said that the executions did not bring them healing or closure. Those in favor of the death penalty also say that the death penalty serves justice in a better manner. If a suspect murders an innocent person people pro death penalty thinks the death penalty serves the most justice.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who support the death penalty say yes due to the “General Deterrence Theory”. David Muhlhausen demonstrates that the “General Deterrence Theory”, explains how capital punishment affects murder rates. He goes into detail by stating that it explains that increasing the risk of apprehension and punishment for crime, stops people from committing crime (1). These supports say believe that overall the more executions there are, and the quicker these executions are carried out, the faster the murder rate will decrease. This is a major argument for Death Penalty supporters, who attempt to back it up with statistics on such cases.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Our justice shows more sympathy for the criminals than it does victims” (source 1). When a criminal is put in prison for murder does not mean that out justice has more sympathy for the criminal than the victims. The judge or police officers can not bring back the victims and if they could, they would. Its kind of like telling someone “famous” to go die, when in reality they were put in this world for a reason. So with that said criminals were put in the world for a reason, it may not have been to kill someone maybe it was to learn while they were in prison that it was…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays