The Cause Of The Outbreak Of American Civil War

Superior Essays
For many people, America means freedom, but not many people really know how this country became free. People believe that everyone is free in this country and that this is very important for each person. The Constitution provides us with a blessing of freedom in many senses, including the freedom of speech, religion, and many more. If we were to ask a modern student what was the cause of the outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861, certainly he or she might say that it all started because of slavery. Slavery was a big concern for many people, especially for those who lived in the Northern states. The North did not have slavery, and hence it wanted to free black slaves and stop the slavery in the South. The South, by contrast, did not want …show more content…
Politicians just could not share the power because any amount of power is never enough for them. As for the southern plantation owners and their right to own slaves, this was not a big concern for most people, even for those who found slavery unacceptable for religious and moral reasons. Most believed that slavery should gradually wither away by itself. Of course, there were supporters of the movement to free the slaves. For example, John Brown, who was an abolitionist and one of the earliest in the history of civil rights, fought to end slavery. He did a lot and tried his best to stop slavery, and in 1859 he was hanged. Even though slavery was one of the reasons that led to the war, it was not the main reason. The politicians were ready to fight for the power, but not for the liberation of the …show more content…
One of these systems believes that slavery should not be allowed and has to rely only on free men, and the other wants to rely only on slavery (Foner 268). Of course, the intentions of one political system are humane and correct: every human has to be free and we have no right to own slaves, force labor, or prey on others. Although the struggle for the liberation of the slaves was only part of the war for power, it was a big step for humanity and particularly for people of color. The second political system, of course, did not agree with the first one. They could not just stop slavery. If they did, then who would do all the hard work, and do it for free? Slave labor was widely used on plantations, allowing American slave owners to make high profits. So, stopping slavery and freeing all of the slaves would have meant a decrease in revenue or even default on loans. In William Henry’s argument, he is saying that the United States cannot be both a slaveholding and a free-labor nation (Foner 270). It just has to be one or the other, because otherwise there will always be wars for one side or the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Framers 3/5 Compromise

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the Framers began writing the Constitution in 1787 to govern our great nation, Americans had been avoiding an ugly truth. Slavery had been in American since the colonization of Jamestown in 1619 because indentured servants had become too expensive to bring over from England to do their work. The colonists’ only option for survival was to bring slaves over to help with the hard labor no one else wanted to do or could do. When the slaves came, they gave the colonists a chance at living. They helped with the tobacco crop and rice.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Dbq

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Northern and Southern states differ in views on slavery because the North demands the abolition of slavery, and the recognition of…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While many people in America debated the morality of slavery, Northerners thought slavery was unnecessary, cruel, and inhumane, while on the other hand southerners felt they needed slavery. They needed slaves to grow the crops and allowed the farmers to be extremely successful. Also, they wanted slaves for free labor that allowed the farmers to save money. Congress passed many laws and acts to appease the two sides of the nation. While the presidential candidates shared their thought and opinions on the issue.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North ended up getting there way in this issue and made tariffs. Tariffs were a tax put on imported goods. The North wouldn't need to pay this tax much because they made all their finished goods themselves. The South was furious about these tariffs because since they only made raw materials they were forced to buy imported goods.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many leaders could not decide whether or not to make slave men and women free. Which was a conflict because of the Declaration of independence, it stated that “all man are created equal”. This was a conflict, especially for Thomas Jefferson since he wrote part of the Declaration of independence. Despite the Declaration of Independence, we have the U.S. Constitution does have something to say about slavery. In the year 1865, we can see that it state “Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, nor any place subject to their jurisdiction”.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. What are some of the long-term causes of the American Civil War (1800s-1850s)? Please give at least 2 examples. The American Civil War was driven by long-term causes and short-term causes.…

    • 3821 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Zinn states many opinions within this article that show how he believes that racism is not natural, but historical. His definition of what contributed to racism was “the combination of inferior status and derogatory thoughts. (Zinn 24)” These contributions were often expressed when many colonies relied on slavery when product levels decreased. He also stated that “it was natural to consider imported blacks as slaves. (Zinn 25)”…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: How did slavery affect politics between 1800 and 1860? This time era is the pre-civil war era in America. The tensions were quite high between these years only growing tighter. The North was doing all it could to stop the South and its expansion of slavery into the new western territories. The main political goal of the North was in fact to stop the expansion of slavery not abolish it from the South.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South was as secure in their conviction that slavery was a proper institution as the Minutemen who turned the British back at the Old North Bridge were in theirs. The insulation of the South allowed these convictions to thrive without serious opposition in local communities. With everyone thinking and therefore voting the same way it was easy to keep slavery alive for decades. Insomuch as they believed the proslavery position was unfounded in reality putting forward idealized and sometimes fantastical ideas of Southern society and slave holding. The slave’s perspective was very much real where even in the best position slaves still felt the fear of sale and control by whites.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To some extent, Southern slave-owners used the concept of state rights as a tool to justify outright racism. However, some were genuinely concerned about the role of the federal government. According to Jeff Schweitzer, slavery was the “central point of contention” in the Civil War, but the issue also extended to a disagreement over who should “decide whether slavery [is] acceptable, local institutions or a distant central government power” (Huffington Post). Disagreement over this very conflict is what characterized politics in the antebellum period. Southerners, particularly slave-owners, generally supported the Democratic Party, which was based in “states’ rights, strict construction of the Constitution, limited federal government, and the guardianship of slavery” (Beachler).…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The North wanted America to remain as a whole, however, the South wanted separation from the union so that they could expand on slavery. The Federal Government look at the actions of the South as if the south was trying to assert authority over the government so that they could abolish laws that they did not agree with. The Federal Government did not like that one bit, and this is when tension started to build. The south tried expanding their territory into the north in order to build strength, however, the north had more money, and resources. The Gold Rush sprung into action which caused many immigrants to move west, completely eliminating the chances of the south making Western states into slave states.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A major conflict between the North and South was over the expansion of slavery into the West. The North believed that slavery should stay in the South…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north believed in a free labor system where everyone had a chance to be successful if they worked hard in their industrialized manufacturing economy. The south believed in slave labor, where planters could get rich from free forced labor in their agricultural dominated economy. The north believed that slavery was a flawed system that created an aristocratic planter class, not allowing for self made success. The south believed that their economy and success relied on slavery, and that without it, the whole economy would collapse. The north believed that secession was unconstitutional, while the south believed that it was constitutional.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays