Map Questions

Improved Essays
Read pages 482-485
Focus Question (page 482):
The admission of new states to the Union fueled the debate by interrupting the balance between the number of slave states and free states. According to the textbook, it states, “[T]erritory gained by the Mexican-American War threatened to destroy the balance.” In the senate this would mean one side would have more power than the other due to popular vote. Both the North and South were opposed to this idea resulting in the debate.
Checkpoint (pg. 483):
The Free-Soil Party was founded to unite both Democrats and Whigs to ban slavery in the territory gained from the Mexican-American War. In the process they chose a candidate for the election of 1848.
Primary Source (pg. 484):
a. Daniel Webster
…show more content…
499):
The election of Abraham Lincoln sparked the secession of the Southern states because they knew that Lincoln was against slavery and had the power to abolish it. The only way to make sure the Southern economy didn’t end up in tatters was to make sure that slavery continued and to secede from the government of the United States of America.
Map Questions (pg. 500):
a. On the map, green stands for the states where the votes went to Lincoln (Republican Party) in the 1860 election, purple for Douglas (Northern Democrat), yellow for Bell (Constitutional Union), and orange for Breckinridge (Southern Democrat). The Republican Party won almost all of the Northern states while the Southern Democrat Party won almost all of the Southern states.
b. The map shows sectionalism was important in the election as it comes to show how the North and South were divided by their opinions. In the election, this sectionalism gave way to peer pressure as people were persuaded to vote for one side over the other. Thus, the election was clearly split between the North and the South.
Checkpoint (pg.
…show more content…
Read pages 512-514
Focus Question (pg. 512):
Each side on the Civil War thought the war would be won easily because each had advantages that made them almost equal. This made it a long and bloody war.
Map Questions (pg. 513):
a. Kentucky, West Virginia, Missouri, and Maryland.
b. It was important to the Union to keep the border states from seceding from the Union as the North needed all the help they could get. After all, there’s strength in numbers and Lincoln would not let the Confederacy win.
Chart Questions (pg. 514):
a. The Union had the greatest advantage in factory production as this gave the Union more ammo and the production helped them win the war. The South, in contrast, had almost no factory production, making them run low on supplies.
b. For population, more men means more troops to fight in the war. More factory production means more uniforms, more armory, etc. More railroad mileage means supplies can get places faster.
c. Based on the chart, it’s obvious that the Union would win the war due to the fact they have a better chance with more people, production, and supplies.
Checkpoint (pg.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The new party was mainly led by anti-slavery Whigs and some northern anti-slavery Democrats. The main focus of the Republican Party was preventing the practice of slavery into the new expanding territories. They also showed interest in federal funding for the transcontinental railroad and other transportation improvements. Due to slavery, they were trying the keep the Missouri Compromise from repealing. The first Republican candidate running for president election lost against the Democrat James Buchanan.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The need for economic and social changes in the northern economy led to the formation of the Republican Party. Failure of the Know-Nothing party of 1854, called for a better party that could resist Catholic religion and slavery. Notably, the party advocated for free labor. Consequently, white laborers were given freedom while the black slavery was prohibited from expansion. Continued disagreements on ending slavery led to the rise of two political powers; Dred Scott and Abraham Lincoln.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1854 the Republican Party impeded any chance of preserving the Union, for Lincoln stated “In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed” (Lincoln, “House Divided”). The formation of the party happened as the issues of slavery was becoming a bigger issue. Their views and campaign of abolishing slavery made the issue even worse than it was due to the fact that it influenced people to take action against it. Therefore, the formation of the Republican Party was the sole reason for why the Civil War took place. It has since made compromise hard to accomplish and friction between the two parties intensify.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the rise of sectional differences caused by conflicting views regarding slavery, Lewis Cass, a Democratic Senator from Michigan, proposed a new idea to solve this issue. He introduced the concept of popular sovereignty, in which states decide whether or not to allow slavery based on a majority vote. In 1848, Cass became the Democrat nominee for the presidential election based around his campaign of popular sovereignty, also known as “squatter”. His opponents included Mexican war hero General Zachary Taylor of the Whigs party, along with former president Martin van Buren of the Free-Soil Party, who aimed at preserving the Western land for the whites only (“Vermilya”). Taylor defeated Cass by a narrow margin, but suddenly died in 1850…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Great politicians came together to address the struggle and successfully implemented a series of compromises in 1787, 1820 and 1850 regarding the use of new land and the abolishment of the slave trade. The compromises temporarily relieved the sectional conflict by increasing the South’s representation in the House of Representatives and abolishing the slave trade for the North. When the United States acquired new land in the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 and the Mexican War in 1848, the compromises became less effective because they did not include guidelines applicable to the new land. In an attempt to minimize sectional tension over the new land, politicians implemented a new system called popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, an electoral process created in the 1830s that allowed individual states to rule on slavery, gained support after the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Missouri Compromise was repealed in 1854, congress passed the Kansas- Nebraska act, which allowed states and territories to decide for themselves whether they allow slavery. Following its repeal, violent opposition throughout Kansas and Illinois caused the Republican party to be revived with Lincoln on its side. Generally speaking, Lincoln did stand against slavery, but he didn’t believe on the level of morale. Instead, he believed that slavery was a bad economic development. In summary, Lincoln did not believe that slaves were equal to white men, but believed that the founding fathers meant that all men were created with certain inalienable rights.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This election was the final act that lead the nation into the American Civil War in April 1861. Due to Lincoln’s views on slavery and his position in the North, the South was particularly averse to Abraham Lincoln running for president. The South went so far as to keep Lincoln’s name off the ballots, so Southerners couldn’t vote for the Whig Party Leader. Lincoln’s decision to fight was based on his feelings that as president it was his sacred duty to conserve the Union at all cost, rather than being based on his feelings towards slavery. Abraham Lincoln’s election ended up being to final push that the Southern states need to make the decision to secede from the…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War began because of the differences between the slave states and the free slave states to end slavery. The abolitionist movement began in the North, which caused the country to split into North and South. The North and the South fought over constitutional rights because liberty was not defined the same between the North and the South. People in the South supported slavery and not abolition, which led to the Civil War. The South fought for freedom and the North fought for ideals for the constitution.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The President of the United States at the time, would have created further tensions between the North and the South. One of the final events which came a year before the start of the American Civil War in 1861, was the 1860 election in which Abraham Lincoln became the new President. Lincoln was seen as an abolitionist, suggesting that he wanted to abolish slavery however it was not until 1864, that he officially announced that he wanted to abolish slavery in his 13th Amendment. As a result of Lincoln’s presidency, the South decided that their only option was to secede, as they did not believe in what Lincoln thought about slavery. Lincoln had to ensure that the laws were being carried out with fair practice, however this had the disapproval of slaves.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The last chapters of the book are dedicated to the execution of the Civil War, the Presidency of Abraham Lincoln, and the attempts by the five living former presidents to oppose and in some cases undermine his efforts in executing the war. Pierce, Tyler and Buchanan put their support in the 1860 election behind John Breckenridge, the southern democrat nominee as a candidate and Buchanan’s vice president. Fillmore did not believe that any of the Republicans made suitable candidates while Van Buren, one of the founders of the Democratic party and a supporter of the Stephen Douglas northern wing, believed that the Democrats should only put forth the strongest candidate against the Republicans which he believed was Stephen Douglas. Van Buren took this so far that he made a deal in his home state of New York to create a fusion ticket that…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays