To prevent another rebellion supported by “discontented men,” “Virginia authorities accelerated the shift to [African] slave on the tobacco plantations.” This rebellion was the turning point of depending labor force to African slaves. One of the differences between slaves and servants was their duration of servitude. As servants were required to work five to seven years, they “could look forward to a release from bondage.” They could be free men with privileges. For African slaves, they could be owned all their life. Also, because “slavery existed in the African states …it was sometimes used by Europeans to justify their own slave trade.” Thus, unlike indentured servants, African slaves would not revolt because of the lack of economic freedom that was not promised to them at the beginning of their slavery. This way, African slaves would not be as discontented in their freedom as English …show more content…
By 1763, half of the population of Virginia was African slaves. They became a “slave society.” Slavery became vital in their economic success. In 1705, the House of Burgesses created a new slave code to further strengthen the stability of slave labor force. It stated that African slaves became “property, completely subject to the will of their master…of the white community.” This demonstrated the superiority of white people including indentured servants. Also, the large distance between plantations in the South made it hard for slaves to meet and gather. So farming became central in their life and not forming a rebellion. Thus, land owners could have complete and lasting control over