Rodrigue writes how free laborers were more than happy to switch to a free labor system because they then had negotiating powers over owners, a considerable difference from cotton growers. Additionally, laborers now earned wages, giving them the opportunity to save up for their own property (a clear Republican free labor ideology). Free laborers accepted the notion of free labor rather well, notes Rodrigue, because they had the power to negotiate through lower wages. On the other side of things were the owners. This new free labor system represented a change of life to them because they could not rely on force to get the best quality of sugar. Because they did not have the same presence in Congress, much less the state legislatures, owners were forced to compromise with free laborers both with laborers, but also with the notion that the police was no longer in favor of their way of
Rodrigue writes how free laborers were more than happy to switch to a free labor system because they then had negotiating powers over owners, a considerable difference from cotton growers. Additionally, laborers now earned wages, giving them the opportunity to save up for their own property (a clear Republican free labor ideology). Free laborers accepted the notion of free labor rather well, notes Rodrigue, because they had the power to negotiate through lower wages. On the other side of things were the owners. This new free labor system represented a change of life to them because they could not rely on force to get the best quality of sugar. Because they did not have the same presence in Congress, much less the state legislatures, owners were forced to compromise with free laborers both with laborers, but also with the notion that the police was no longer in favor of their way of