The word list assessment showed that when mistakes were made the consonant sounds were rarely the source of the mistakes. For example, “man” was pronounced “mon", “nap” was pronounced “nop", “nut” was pronounced “not”, indicating a recognition of beginning and ending consonants. The Spelling Inventory assessment demonstrates a similar pattern. For example “clapping” was spelled “klaping”, “wishes” was spelled “Wishis”, “crawl” was spelled “crol”, “sled” was spelled “slad’, demonstrating his ability to identify even compound consonants. Their recognition of consonants extends beyond simple sounds to more complex variations such as, “ch”, and “sh”. The students scored 91% in oral reading accuracy. His pronunciation improved in the Oral Reading Assessment in contrast to the Word List Assessment. This indicated that the student can use context to aid in pronunciation. It is not uncommon for readers to perform better in running text than in the isolation of a Word List
The word list assessment showed that when mistakes were made the consonant sounds were rarely the source of the mistakes. For example, “man” was pronounced “mon", “nap” was pronounced “nop", “nut” was pronounced “not”, indicating a recognition of beginning and ending consonants. The Spelling Inventory assessment demonstrates a similar pattern. For example “clapping” was spelled “klaping”, “wishes” was spelled “Wishis”, “crawl” was spelled “crol”, “sled” was spelled “slad’, demonstrating his ability to identify even compound consonants. Their recognition of consonants extends beyond simple sounds to more complex variations such as, “ch”, and “sh”. The students scored 91% in oral reading accuracy. His pronunciation improved in the Oral Reading Assessment in contrast to the Word List Assessment. This indicated that the student can use context to aid in pronunciation. It is not uncommon for readers to perform better in running text than in the isolation of a Word List