Skepticism Vs Stoicism

Improved Essays
with no values. Hume also states that we need to have passion, and that these passions shouldn’t be overdone or underdone. Our passions must be benign, cheerful, nonviolent, and social. Hume also puts a large emphasis on nature. He states, “Such a reflection certainly tends to mortify all our passions: But does it not thereby counterwork the artifice of nature, who has happily deceived us into an opinion, that human life is of some importance?” (Hume, 352). The artifice of nature means that nature is trying to trick us into living by making it seem like things are valuable, but according to Hume, we have to care about things that we know have no objective value.
Stoicism claims that the alignment of one’s perception with logos, or logic, is a
…show more content…
Stoicism tells us that no happiness can be secure if it’s rooted in changeable, destructible things. Our bank accounts can grow or shrink, our careers can prosper or falter, even our loved ones can be taken from us. There is only one place the world can’t touch: our inner selves, our choice at every moment to be brave, to be reasonable, to be good. Stoicism teaches us that, before we try to control events, we have to control ourselves first. I think that stoicism would help someone become an effective leader because it helps instill self-respect when facing failure, and it helps prevent arrogance during times of growth and success. Stoicism wants someone to have complete control over oneself and one succeeds in doing so 100% of the time, whereas, any attempt to control outside events are always subject to the possibility of failure. Stoicism appeals to me because I have always believed in the idea that you shouldn’t worry about the things that you don’t have any control over. I don’t feel as if it is necessary to question everything that comes up in your

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Although for completely different reason, they both sought to keep free will and moral responsibility. For the Epicureans, it was the ‘swerve’ that could alter the chain of determinism. Whereas, for the Stoics, Chrysippus attempted to combine determinism and…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is core characteristics like feelings and behaviors that all humans share, but experience them through different perspectives. Early American authors like Thomas Jefferson, Olaudah Equiano, and Jonathan Edwards use rhetorical strategies to help convey their views on human nature in their writings throughout history. Equiano and Edwards have similar views, believing humans are naturally born evil. However, Jefferson believes in equality. These authors have different ways of conveying their message through figurative language, imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to show their contrasting views on human nature.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Odyssey by Homer, Odyssey and I both share the same trait of leadership. Through Odysseus’s adventures he accepted many obstacles and one of them was the horrible/ addicting lotus eaters. He was a leader through this time because he had stated to all of his men this: “All hands aboard; come, clear the beach and no one eat the Lotus, or you will lose your hope of home” (898). In this example, he is protecting his men from the Lotus Eaters. He makes sure they don’t eat them because he wants them to make it home safely.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Philosophy Roman Stoicism was a philosophy that believed that living rightly meant living in a way that was good for nature. They also believed in virtues such as self control and courage. The modern Sierra Club shares the same aspect of living rightly with nature with Roman Stoicism. Both believe in protecting and enjoying nature.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature is the way a human thinks, feels, and behaves. The authors; Jonathan Edwards, Olaudah Equiano, and Thomas Jefferson learn the importance of understanding human nature in Early American Texts, through written history. They all have distinctive views of human nature through the relationship of the government, law, religion, and equality. Edwards and Equiano are quite similar, believing human nature is cruel and brutal, whereas Jefferson differs from the two, believing in equality between the people. They use rhetorical strategies such as; imagery, connotative diction, and parallelism to reveal how human nature should be carefully understood to be protected from being manipulated and to understand where it stands in society.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural Liberty in Nature Alone Modern idealizations of success and prosperity over one’s lifetime are generally compromised by images of wealth, academic achievement, innovation, and leaving a legacy behind. Although all are perceived to be accomplishments, the state of nature at its core does nothing that requires man to submit himself to these needs. Instead, it is man who has over generations created the present constructs harnessing his passion, demanding his performance, and creating chasms in equality. According to Rousseau, man in the state of nature possesses true freedom unlike the civilized man.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One similarity between Buddhism and Stoicism is both focus on the importance of mindfulness. In Buddhism "awareness begins with remembering what we tend to forget" (Batchelor 58). In Stoicism "...reflection... will make us appreciate how wonderful it is that we are alive and have the opportunity to fill this day with activity" (Irvine 71). Once we become mindful of what's presented to us in that moment we have a more positive outlook of life. Because, we took the time to embrace whose and what's in front of us.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that nature is changing and people must know the reason why it is changing because nature changes accordingly to the society. According to Emerson's (1834) observation " human do not entirely understand natures beauty and all the things that nature has to offer us. He further state that people are uncertain by the humankind around them and human must take themselves away from societies flaw and diversion in order to experience the unity with nature for which they are naturally suited". Nature gives human a lot but human do not give in return and they believed that many people need to be separated from the rest of the world because they can see the real nature of the people and how society is changing. According to Conor (30 June 2009) states that "To go into isolation, a man needs to retire from his chamber and he further states that if a man would be alone let him look at the storts".…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will demonstrate why David Hume believes a wise person should believe in the uniformity of nature and not believe in miracles. First, I will lay out and restate Hume’s argument for the belief or disbelief for both the uniformity of nature and for miracles. Next, I will assess the similarities between the two arguments he addresses, and subsequently comment on the differences between the two beliefs, clarifying Hume’s argument. Finally, I will give reasons why I believe Hume is correct.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stoics argument behind passions and emotions being bad presents a good explanation behind how passions can negatively affect reason, however some proponents of stoicism neglect the possibility of the passions’ potential ability to coexist with rationality, furthermore, ambiguity engenders hesitations of the validity behind the argument. The Stoic definition of emotions is synonymously with passions, which are excessive impulses in response to objects or stimulus (Stoics, 1987). Most Stoic’s highlight that these passions are fundamentally contrapurposive to achieving and living a “good life” following the stoic doctrine. The main reasoning behind this is that by indulging passions, one’s reason is hindered. However, other Stoic’s suggest that passions can be enabled without it interfering with one’s ability to be rational and use reason (ibid.).…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Artifice Essay

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A lot of people that don’t know what artifice is won’t know the benefit of and the advantages of it. It can cause a lot of harm and it can heal others. Nevertheless, artifice doesn’t play an important role in my life but now that I know what it is i can be more careful and know when artifice is being…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stoicism In Ancient Rome

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the first and second centuries of Ancient Rome a wave of Stoicism rose to leave a lasting impact, especially through the ideas of Epictetus and Seneca. The two main questions Stoics aimed to answer were; how can one lead a happy and fulfilling life, and how can one be a better human being? These were both believed to be achieved through internal control. Since we are human, we are unable to see what the logos have planned for us, so to have internal control is the most practical and applicable approach to be prepared. The inner realm was regarded to be free, whereas the outer realm was not.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Staying Human Analysis

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Staying Human”- Analyzing 1984 Since the first publication of the novel 1984 by George Orwell, startling questions have been raised regarding the meaning of “staying human.” In a totalitarian government like one featured in the novel, where citizens are desensitized to their very emotions and indoctrinated into propaganda, this becomes quite a feat. But what does it mean to stay human? Is it to act on ones emotions and whims, to be free, under ones own control, or is there something more.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume believed that justice promoted human happiness. Hume was a moral sentimentalist so he believed morality was grounded in something other than reason. He was similar to Hutcheson in this aspect but he also believed individual justice can sometime conflict with what benevolence would motivate us to do. A sentimentalist believes that judgments about what is right depends on our passions rather than reason or a moral sense but, he also thinks the sentimentalist owes us an account of how a sense of justice that is opposed to sympathy or self-interest that can also develop out of such motives. The virtue of justice in not natural and is actually artificial according to Hume.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dexter Sommerfeldt Dr. Alexander Phil 366 11 December 2015 Vogel on the Refutation of Skepticism In the essay “The Refutation of Skepticism,” we see author Jonathon Vogel attempt to deny any skeptic claims about the external world. In its most simple form, his argument claims that to deny skepticism would be the best explanation of the material world. For slight background information, skepticism is the epistemological view that we simple lack the ability to have knowledge of a material world; the reasoning for this will be described later. First, defining Vogel’s complex argument is a necessity, then I will be providing a critical analysis of his essay as well as provide potential objections.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays