Ethos In Ted Talk Speech

Gaining viewer attention while speaking can be a complex issue unless approached carefully by the presenter. Typically, the use of ethos, pathos, and logos can strategically strengthen the connection with an audience especially alongside the use of rhetorical strategies. Sir Ken Robinson used all of these strategies to gather the interest of those around him during his Ted Talk in February 2006 which is still being discussed to this day. By examining how creativity is being killed in school, he gained credibility, an emotional connection and persuasion through an exposed argument.
Sir Ken Robinson’s Ted Talk about schools killing creativity embodies any discussion that is had regarding the foreseeable future in human progression. He captures …show more content…
To use the rhetorical analysis of ethos effectively, one must present himself in such a way to gain respect from the gallery while simultaneously showing authority over his subject. He posed himself in a way that made the words he was saying seem wise and credited. It was obvious he knew his topic, and he knew how to get the words he way saying to make an impact on those who were already emotionally interested. His expertise was flashing between the gaps in his words in like manner that he could have been discussing any topic and his use of ethos would have shown immensely. He was a very fair minded person, which according to studies by Oxford University, as a human population, we have a tendency to believe those types of speakers to a greater extent due to first impressions. The use of his thought out facts and judgements about the creativity becoming halted in education really extends this trust and loyalty that a viewer immediately will connect with him. Sometimes …show more content…
He starts out by listing out educational facts, such as the fact that in the next 30 years more people will graduate worldwide than ever before. Comparatively he questions how this can be true when less inventions are being created by students. The only reasoning he has for the hypothesis is that education has to be killing the creativity of young minds. His evidence continues to prove that education is only for the benefit of already self-proclaimed industries. These same industries are causing inflation in academics where the higher degree you achieve the more successful you are perceived to be. By presenting these facts and statistics he is supporting his argument through the logos rhetorical