Sino-American Accommodation In 1949 Analysis

Great Essays
In this essay I will discuss and analyse the title, was there a ‘lost chance’ for Sino-American accommodation in 1949. To conduct this analysis, I will look at several different significant factors that may have potentially altered any decisions made regarding Sino-American accommodation in 1949. Firstly I will examine the divergences between political ideologies in relation to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Western societies (primarily the United States). Secondly, I will investigate whether the continued support from Washington to the Chinese Nationalist Party also known as the GMD had a considerable effect on the potential opportunity for a Sino-American accommodation. I will finally evaluate whether or not the Anti-American Policy …show more content…
Main Body:
Section A:
The Inflexible Truman Administration:
It is highly debated from the American point of view that there was potential for a Sino-American accommodation in 1949. “Warren Cohen and Nancy Tucker have put forward a ‘lost chance’ thesis on the basis of the troublesome CCP-Soviet relationship during the civil war, the Huang-Stuart talks, as well as the department of State’s ‘hands-off’ approach towards Taiwan.” – (Chi-kwan Mark, China and the World Since 1945: An International History, 2003, Pg.17.) However there are several other vital factors that have been excluded from this thesis. The Truman Administration was far too inflexible due to the fact that they were highly influenced by Cold War and domestic politics. This resulted in the CCP and Mao favouring the Soviet Union in relation to political connections and alliances. The inflexibility can be clearly seen within the Truman Administration when there was no rational reason to maintain strong political ties with the GMD as it was apparent that the CCP was going to win the civil war regardless of help from the US. However no singular person wanted to be associated with the acceptance of a communist China and the considered ‘loss’ of a capitalistic China. It cannot be disputed
…show more content…
It is apparent that both nations had alternate views on how the economy should be run. The CCP’s idea of communism versus The United States idea of capitalism played a critical role for a Sino-American accommodation in 1949. Hostility and unreceptive behaviour was further augmented between both nations due to the continued support from the US to the GMD. The increased funding and consistent military support further decreased any possibility of a Sino-American accommodation. According to Mao, the primary reason that the Sino-American accommodation was never a lost chance and rather a myth was his principal goals to transform the perception of China being society and not regarded as an international super power. “Even though it might have been possible for Washington to change the concrete course of its China policy (which was highly unlikely given the policy’s complicated background), it would have been impossible for the United States to alter the course and goals of the Chinese revolution, let alone the historical-cultural environment that gave birth to the event” – (Chen Jian, ‘The Myth of America’s “Lost Chance” in China: A Chinese Perspective in Light of New Evidence’, DH 21 (Winter 1997), Pg. 86). Therefore through several major differences between the Chinese Communist Party and the United States, it is obvious that there was no ‘lost chance’

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Chinese, like the Soviets saw themselves as a revolutionary rather than an evolutionary regime; they did not inherit the treaties and debts of previous administrations. The ‘lost chance’ was not a realistic option because of the Chinese relationship with the Soviet Union, their guiding foreign policy principles, the ideology of the post-war United States and the long term objectives of the Revolution. Due to the dynamics of Cold War foreign policy, the Communist Chinese state would align to one side at the expense of the other. The natural ally for…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Us-China Relationship

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    U.S.-China relations have changed significantly over the last 65 years. The drastic changes from conflict to cooperation and from isolation to economic interdependence shows a lack of ideological consistency from either side. Although it is important to understand the ideology of both states, as it is how they perceive they world and make what is to them rational decisions, both the U.S and China are best understood as realist states. Rapprochement was sought in the middle of hostile relations to increase the security interests of both states, not to advance ideology. In the time after the initial move towards rapprochement, we can see through U.S-China relations that states will either contradict or change their ideology to suit their actions.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was their assumption that the United States was actually working to subvert their previous efforts in China. This assumption came from the United States continuing to aid Chiang Kai-Shek both economically and militarily (Iriye 20). Japan lacked the strategic diplomacy necessary for dealing in foreign affairs (Iriye 189). From this stemmed the “suspicion that the United States is as spokesman for the Chungking Regime” (Iriye 36). Because of the mistrust this idea embedded, further discussions were impaired, making the Japanese accredit any unwillingness to agree an intent “to go to war” (Iriye 32).…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Vietnamese government do not recognize labor unions since Vietnam is governed by the Communist Party. However, the most parts of the article suggest that the US needs TPP or some other kinds of an agreement to counter the rising influence of China. Since this article was written after the election, it contrasts between President-elect Donald Trump’s view toward TPP and President Barack Obama’s view. Comments for both side seems neutral, but since article is about negative effects of withdrawing from TPP, it slightly favors President Obama. It implies that President-elect Trump neglects diminishing influence toward Asia, which would destroy President Obama’s rebalance toward…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the Cold War, Khrushchev realized that the communist movement was a losing battle and therefore decided to pursue a peaceful co-existence with the West (Luthi). On the other hand, for China, the war was the most effective way of spreading communism unlike peaceful co-existence arguing the case of Bolshevik Party which rose to power as a result of World War II. During the Camp David Talks between the US president and Khrushchev, the rift between the Communist China and the Soviet Union further increased as Mao failed to see the need for peaceful co-existence and how it would have helped in spreading communism. The failure by Khrushchev to follow Marxist-Leninist made Mao to term Khrushchev as a revisionist in the view of subsequent political and economic development. According to Mao, the East was above the West having orbited a satellite and developed the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, and therefore, instead of pursuing peaceful relationships, it was time to start World War III as a way of spreading communism worldwide.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government kept being indifferent to the Japanese expansion in the west, but the communist party gave the people hope to solve the foreign affairs and the domestic ones, too. Consequently, as Communist Party strengthened, the idea of communism was widely supported. Later, when the People’s Republic of China was established, communism took root in Chinese society. The Revolution of 1949 was an uprising demanding a switch of the government to a pro-communism government. The revolution, also known as Chinese Communist Revolution, has shown the culture of Chinese society that deeply inherited Mao’s belief.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The realist model explains the outcome but assumes a great deal. All we really know for sure is that the United States is in fact dominating world politics at the time. The realist application assumes that the Chinese leaders fear survival and thus builds up national security. There is no indication that China ever feared for its national security. Perhaps China was taking an evolutionary step to democracy.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While China tried to not fall into a trap that China’s rise is a threat, USA kept conjuring up the rise as a threat. The United States tried to bring China down by presenting the China’s rise as a threat to the world. In order to defend the argument that China is not a threat, China argued that its power is ‘soft power’ rather than ‘hard power’. Ultimately, China do not seek the competition among the other countries; they concentrate on factors that are not related to conflict-productions such as rule-making, regulation, and…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of The Korean War

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is a valid fear as China is a communist country, and the U.S. is anti-communism. China intervening is also justified due to the fact that they had warned the UN not to cross the 38th parallel. However justified China 's intervention, the fact remains that this could have triggered a third would war. Prior to China 's intervention, the war appeared to be turning out in the favor of the U.S.. Shortly after China intervened, it looked more like the U.S. would lose.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Controversy surrounds whether the intervention of the U.S. in the Korean War was justified or not. One side believes that Truman was inconsistent with American strategic policy which is based on a statement made by Secretary of State Dean Acheson. Korea was excluded in U.S. defense perimeter of strategic containment policy. Although it is arguable that the intervention was unnecessary and unjustified, the war played an important role in modern history. The Korean War was a crucial event during the Cold War that protected the capitalist values, prevented the spread of communism and proved that the Truman administration was anti-communist.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays